Oklahoma City, OK.
Over the last several months, while the election crisis was in full swing, Ignite Liberty has been working on compiling a comprehensive report on the Wuhan Virus. We are please to present that to you in this article. Some of the article below was originally published in our 21 October 2020 newsletter, but it is pertinent to republish it here so as to present a full picture of the level of deception and lies that we as a society are being inundated with.
While we originally intended to publish this report at the end of last year, we decided to wait until the COVID-19 “vaccines” were finished so we could include a section on their efficacy, if any, and the risks they bring to the population as a whole. That way you could have a complete picture of the facts to allow you and your loved ones to make a wise, informed decision as opposed to a decision made out of the fear-mongering that the MSM is peddling.
While the “vaccine” has been out for a few weeks, it took us until this week to finally compile enough research to bring you a comprehensive report. This report will be published in 3 different articles over the next 3 days. After the 3rd article, we will make the entire report available for download on our website. We urge you to put off getting the Wuhan Virus Vaccine until you have read all 3 articles. It is vital to you and your loved one’s health.
The Big Lie
All of the draconian mandates, ordinances, and lockdowns have been based off of three different lies: the falsified PCR testing, the myth of asymptomatic spread, and the death rate. Those three lies have been the pillars upon which the powers that be have imposed their system of tyranny upon us that allowed them to destroy the economy, steal the most powerful office in the world from the people who supported President Trump, and install a fraudulent CCP puppet as President. THAT’S how big this is. This is not just about a virus. It’s about the CCP taking over the world. Now with “vaccine” out, the CCP is set to crush all freedom and liberty under its boot of tyranny.
This report is probably the most important piece we will ever publish. Not because reports on election integrity aren’t important. They are. The CCP Virus was the main vehicle that Communists used to bring down the free world. If you’re going to attack a fraud, you must do so by attacking and exposing the initial lie. Once you do that, the whole grift falls apart. It is our intention through this report to give you, the reader, the power to tear down the massive lies that have gripped our entire country, and even the world.
The PCR Test
Since the PCR test has been accepted as the “gold standard” for diagnosing CCP virus cases, it’s efficacy is, and should, be at the heart of the pandemic. If the testing process and procedures are legitimate, then the results should be legitimate too. We’ll start our report, then, with examining the history of PCR tests, what they were meant to do, and apply critical reasoning to determine if they are being used correctly today.
The RT-PCR test stands for reverse transcript polymerase chain reaction. It is a process where luminescence chemicals (chemicals that illuminate things that are invisible) are used to allow detection of viral DNA. In the words of Dr. Kary Mullis (the Nobel Prize winning inventor of the PCR Test), “PCR detects a very small segment of the nucleic acid which is part of a virus itself. The specific fragment detected is determined by the somewhat arbitrary choice of DNA primers used which become the ends of the amplified fragment.“[1]
So, in theory, what the PCR tests are detecting is a small segment of RNA that belongs to the virus. But does that mean a person is “infected”? To answer that question, we need to examine the proper diagnostic process used in clinical medicine.
What Is a “Case”?
Historically speaking, infections have always been diagnosed by a process known as Koch’s Postulates. These postulates, developed by Robert Koch in the 1800’s, include the following four criteria: (1) The microorganism must be found in diseased but not healthy individuals; (2) The microorganism must be cultured from the diseased individual; (3) Inoculation of a healthy individual with the cultured microorganism must recapitulated the disease; and finally (4) The microorganism must be re-isolated from the inoculated, diseased individual and matched to the original microorganism[2].
These postulates were invented for the detection of microorganisms and bacteria that cause disease; however, they were created long before the discovery of viruses. The problem that this presented when trying to apply them to viral detection is that many different viruses can create the same type of disease. For instance, the entire family of influenza-like-illnesses (ILI) have the same, or very similar, symptomology: fever, body aches, cough, congestion, etc. To account for this, the postulates were re-worked in the late 20th century. We won’t elaborate more here, but suffice it to say that it still followed the same general process as the original postulates: infection, testing, culturing, diagnosis.
Therefore, according to accepted scientific standards, properly diagnosing a “case” of any ILI -whether it’s Flu A, Flu B, H1N1, SARS, or Covid – involves first illness, followed by testing and diagnosis.
What Is “Infection”?
A “positive” PCR test does not, I repeat does NOT, mean a positive diagnosis of disease. Dr. Kary Mullis, when asked about the use of PCR tests back during the HIV/AIDS crisis, said the following:
“PCR, if you do it really well, you can find almost everything in everybody…there’s very few molecules that you don’t have at least one single one of in your body…[the PCR test] allows you to take a very minuscule amount of anything and make it measurable and talk about it in meetings as if it’s somewhat important. That’s not a misuse [of the PCR test], that’s a misinterpretation…PCR is just a process to make a whole lot of something out of something. That’s what it is. It doesn’t tell you if you’re sick and it doesn’t tell you that the thing you ended up with really was going to hurt you or anything like that.” (Emphasis added)
The inventor of the PCR test, for which he was awarded a Nobel Prize, stated in no uncertain terms that is can NOT be used to diagnose disease. When considering Koch’s Postulates as mentioned above, it’s easy to see why. The PCR test only shows you what is there. It does not prove that it’s making you sick.
So, what is infection? Dr. David Rasnick, noted bio-chemist bio-chemist, protease developer, and former founder of an EM lab called Viral Forensics, gave us a clue when interviewed by Uncoverdc.com:
“You have to have a whopping amount of any organism to cause symptoms. Huge amounts of it. You don’t start with testing; you start with listening to the lungs. I’m skeptical that a PCR test is ever true. It’s a great scientific research tool. It’s a horrible tool for clinical medicine. 30% of your infected cells have been killed before you show symptoms. By the time you show symptoms…the dead cells are generating the symptoms.” (Emphasis added)
That said, infection, or disease, is only present when your body’s immune system has begun to do what God intended it to do – fight off disease. In fact, the symptoms that drive most people to the doctor are caused by your body, not by the disease. The fever, coughing, phlegm, etc. are all your body’s natural defense mechanism as it tries to kill off a pathogen that it deems to be a danger. By the time you “feel sick”, your body is already engaged in the fight.
Conclusion
This will lead us into the theory of asymptomatic spread in our next article. If you’re lacking symptoms, and thus do not meet the clinical criteria for infection (despite the test results), then is it possible to make other people sick if they’re in close proximity? If you lack clinical criteria for infection, are you even considered sick?
These questions are controlling every aspect of our lives right now. They are the justifications for the mask mandates, restaurant lockdowns, travel restrictions, etc. Answer this question is absolutely critical. Which is what we will do in our next article.
[1] Farber, C. (April 7, 2020). “Was the Covid-19 Test Meant to Detect a Virus?”. https://uncoverdc.com/2020/04/07/was-the-covid-19-test-meant-to-detect-a-virus/#
[2] Segre J. A. (2013). What does it take to satisfy Koch’s postulates two centuries later? Microbial genomics and Propionibacteria acnes. The Journal of investigative dermatology, 133(9), 2141–2142. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2013.260
COPYRIGHT © 2021 · IGNITE LIBERTY