• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • ABOUT
    • WHO WE ARE
    • WHAT WE BELIEVE
      • SELF GOVERNMENT
      • FAMILY GOVERNMENT
      • THE PROPER ROLE OF CIVIL GOVERNMENT
      • CHURCH GOVERNMENT
  • EDITORIAL
  • VOTER GUIDES
  • LEGISLATIVE TRACKER
  • DOLLARS & SENSE
  • SPECIAL REPORTS
    • Bob Linn – Friend of Liberty or Enemy of Truth?
    • Oklahoma Turnpike Authority – The Biggest Bully on the Block

Ignite Liberty

Making Critical Thinking Great Again!

  • FEDERAL ELECTIONS
    • 2020 ELECTION
  • CITY COUNCIL ELECTIONS
  • COVID-19
    • COVID-19 RESOURCES
  • WELLNESS WEDNESDAYS WITH DR. JAYNE
  • Pineapples on Mars
    • Pineapples on Mars: LIVE
    • Chapter 1: Introduction
    • Chapter 2: World Death Rates and Covid-19 Infection Fatality Rates
    • Chapter 3: Covid-19 Death Coding, inflation, and Upcharges
    • Chapter 4: Frozen in Time and Masking the Science
    • Chapter 5: Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Testing: A chain reaction of false diagnostics?
    • Chapter 6: Why Stop the Healing? Mass Psychosis, American Health and Suppressed Successful Treatment Protocols for Covid-19
    • Chapter 7: Covid-19 Therapeutic Interventions
    • Chapter 8: Are we being herd? Natural vs Vaccine Immunity
    • Chapter 9: Supreme Ridiculousness, The Original Antigenic Sin, Harm to the Naturally Immune, Omicron and Immunological Responses
    • Chapter 10: Vaccine narratives and continued linguistic evolution: leadership, conflicting data and lipid nanoparticles
    • Chapter 11: The Most Dangerous Vaccine Dethroned: Adverse Event Secrecy, Reporting Systems, Underreporting Factors, Batch Lookup, and Excess Mortality
    • Chapter 12: Undue Risk, Specific Adverse Events, and Autopsy’s after Covid-19 Inoculations
    • Chapter 13: Numerical Trickery, Vaccine Efficacy, Variants and Unnatural Viral Trends
    • Chapter 14: Conclusion: We The People Determine The Ending

Suspicious Voting Patterns Raise Questions About Oklahoma’s Election Security

December 10, 2020

Smartmatic has been at the center of the Election crisis ever since it was discovered that their ImageCast software that is imbedded in the Dominion voting machines, which was created by the Hugo Chavez regime to ensure that he never lost an election, was discovered to have been used by Democrats to flip the elections in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia, Arizona, Nevada, and likely a host of other states. In all of these states, the voting machines in questions were Dominion Voting System’s Democracy Suite.

While Dominion has been rightly demonized in this Election, they are likely not the only problematic company related to this election. The Epoch Times reported in a November 23rd article that the capital investment group (H.I.G. Capital) that owns both Dominion and Hart Intercivic had been investigated in 2019 by a bipartisan group of lawmakers comprising of Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), and Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) because of concerns regard the safety of their voting systems.

Ignite Liberty discovered an EVEREST Study (Evaluation and Validation of Election Related Equipment, Standards and Testing) commissioned by the State of Ohio in 2007 that revealed massive security flaws in the EVS (electronic voting systems) by both Hart Intercivic and Premier (which later was sold to Dominion in 2010). You can read that article here. Additionally, we discovered a January 16, 2011 article in The Oklahoman that highlighted the purchase of Hart Intercivic voting machines for use statewide in Oklahoma elections. It has been used here ever since.

After revealing this information, Ryan Hill, a local citizen-journalist and friend of Ignite Liberty, notified us over the weekend that our social media posts regarding Hart Intercivic’s role in Oklahoma elections motivated him to examine voting patterns in the major counties in our state. That examination revealed certain troubling patterns in the absentee voting patterns in Oklahoma, Cleveland, Payne, and Tulsa counties. Mr. Hill stated the reason he looked at just the absentee votes was because of the security of Oklahoma’s voting laws would have made cheating in early voting or election day voting nearly impossible. If there was voter fraud it would have to be in the absentee votes since those are not counted at the precinct level.

We have since analyzed the same voting patterns and compared them with historical averages over the last 5 election cycles (going back to the 2012 general election). We compared the voting turnout for the main Republican and Democrat candidates for Presidential, Senatorial, Congressional, County Clerk, County Court Clerk, and Sheriff races in Oklahoma County. We then used the change in the number of registered voters as a control group to determine if the trends we were seeing could be answered by a sudden shift in Republican and/or Democrat registered voters. All of the data we used has been pulled from the Oklahoma County Election Board’s website. Our findings are published below.

Before we begin, we must stress that we are NOT accusing any of the members or employees of The Oklahoma County Election Board of fraud. However, we know that it is possible for these voting machines to be accessed by outside malevolent actors intent on depriving Oklahomans of a fair and honest election. It is our hope through this report to state our case for a hand recount of all absentee votes in the counties in question, especially in light of upcoming City Council races. If even one vote was flipped it represents a criminal infringement on our most sacred of rights.

Presidential

We begin our analysis with the last three presidential votes. In 2012, then-Senator Romney beat out President Obama in absentee votes by nearly a 2-1 margin:

Presidential Absentee Mail Early Voting Election Day Total Votes Percentage
Obama 5,297 9,711 91,974 106,982 41.67%
Romney 10,930 4,153 134,645 149,728 58.33%
Total 16,227 13,864 226,619 256,710

A similar pattern emerged in 2016, with President Trump beating Hillary Clinton by almost 2,000 absentee votes:

Presidential Absentee Mail Early Voting Election Day Total Votes Percentage
Trump/Pence 6,790 7,530 48,218 62,538 57.14%
Johnson/Weld 709 715 6,659 8,083 7.39%
Clinton/Kaine 4,645 5,501 28,683 38,829 35.48%
Total 12,144 13,746 83,560 109,450

Yet in 2020, the trends completely change, with Biden outpacing Hillary and Obama by almost 50K votes, despite never setting foot in the state:

Presidential Absentee Mail Early Voting Election Day Total Votes Percentage
Trump/Pence 29,408 6,024 109,618 145,050 49.21%
Jorgensen/Cohen 1,400 158 3,714 5,272 1.79%
Biden/Harris 55,118 9,860 76,746 141,724 48.08%
Simmons/Roze 256 20 576 852 0.29%
West/Tidball 257 30 1,039 1,326 0.45%
Pierce/Ballard 162 7 347 516 0.18%
Total 86,601 16,099 192,040 294,740

By comparison, in 2016 Trump outpaced Hillary by nearly 20% of the absentee vote:

Percentage Absentee Early Voting Election Day Total
Trump/Pence 55.43% 42.76% 51.97% 51.68%
Clinton/Kaine 38.19% 52.92% 40.52% 41.18%

Yet in 2020, Trump trailed Biden by almost 30%:

Percentage Absentee Early Voting Election Day
Trump/Pence 33.96% 37.42% 57.08%
Jorgensen/Cohen 1.62% 0.98% 1.93%
Biden/Harris 63.65% 61.25% 39.96%
Simmons/Roze 0.30% 0.12% 0.30%
West/Tidball 0.30% 0.19% 0.54%
Pierce/Ballard 0.19% 0.04% 0.18%

In order to determine the full possible impact, we compared the vote totals that Trump and Biden reportedly received with the totals they would have received (at a minimum) if they received the same percentage of votes as the main candidates got in 2016:

Party Actual Proposed* Difference % Change
Trump/Pence 29,408  46,855 17,447 24.42%
Biden/Harris 55,118  32,279 22,839 -24.42%
Total 84,526 79,134 40,285

As you can see, there was a minimum +40,000 vote flip from historical norms for a candidate who never campaigned once in the Sooner State over a President who made his first campaign stop after the COVID stoppage here in Oklahoma, and enjoys huge popularity among Oklahomans. As a result of this flip, President Trump won Oklahoma County by less than 4,000 votes.

U.S. Senate Race

The trends continue in the race for U.S. Senate. In 2016, Senator Lankford easily outpaced his Democrat challenger by more than a 2-1 margin in absentee votes:

Candidate Absentee Early Voting Election Day TOTAL
James Lankford (Rep)
20,469 9,955 130,067 160,491
Mike Workman (Dem) 9,163 9,110 70,949 89,222
Total 29,632 19,065 201,016 249,713

However, this year first-time political challenger Abby Broyles nearly reversed that ratio on long-time Senate stalwart Jim Inhofe:

Candidate Absentee Early Voting Election Day TOTAL
Jim Inhofe (Rep)
30,207 6,008 105,877 142,092
Abby Broyles (Dem) 53,971 9,688 75,900 139,559
Total 86,652 16,080 191,515 294,247

That represents a nearly complete flip of percentages in absentee voting:

2016:

Percentage Absentee Early Voting Election Day TOTAL
Lankford 69.08% 52.22% 64.70%
64.27%
Workman 30.92% 47.78% 35.30%
35.73%

2020:

Percentage Absentee Early Voting Election Day TOTAL
Inhofe 34.86% 37.36% 55.28% 48.29%
Broyles 62.28% 60.25% 39.63% 47.43%

Following the same methodology as the presidential analysis, this represents a swap of greater than 55,000 votes over historical trends:

Proposed 2020 Vote Totals based on Historical Norms – US Senate (Absentee)
Party Actual Proposed* Difference % Change
Inhofe 30,207 58,148 27,941 33.19%
Broyles 53,971 26,030 27,941 -33.19%
Total 84,178 84,178 55,882

U.S. House (CD5)

Similar trends are found in the hotly-contested House District 5 race between Stephanie Bice and Kendra Horn. While Horn outperformed Steve Russell in absentee in her 2018 victory by about 2,000 votes, her lead soared to nearly 22,000 votes over Stephanie Bice in 2020 despite a strong, concerted effort to oust her by the OKGOP:

2018:

Candidate Absentee Early Voting Election Day TOTAL Percentage
Steve Russell (Rep_) 9,772 5,994 85,059 100,825
47.66%
Kendra Horn (Dem) 11,326 9,053 90,348 110,727
52.34%
Total 21,098 15,047 175,407 211,552

2020:

Candidate Absentee Early Voting Election Day TOTAL
Stephanie Bice (Rep) 28,374 5,807 98,436 132,617
Kendra Horn (Dem) 52,279 9,233 73,466 134,978
Total 80,653 15,040 171,902 267,595

While holding to historical averages would have still had Horn winning the absentee vote, it is not nearly as much as what was reported:

Party Actual Proposed* Difference % Change
Bice 28,374 37,356 8,982 11.14%
Horn 52,279 43,297 8,982 -11.14%
Total 80,653 80,653 17,964

Oklahoma County Clerk

The anomalies even continued to down-ballot local races. In 2016, David Hooten easily beat Chris Powell in absentee votes by a margin similar to James Lankford’s win over Mike Workman:

Candidate Absentee Early Voting Election Day TOTAL
David B. Hooten 20,420 10,121 124,775 155,316
Chris Powell 7,560 6,927 74,532 89,019
TOTAL 27,980 17,048 199,307 244,335
Percentage Absentee Early Voting Election Day TOTAL
Hooten 72.98% 59.37% 62.60% 63.57%
Powell 27.02% 40.63% 37.40% 36.43%

In 2020, the margins completely flip:

Parties Absentee Early Voting Election Day Total
David B. Hooten (Rep)
35,696 6,404 114,078 156,178
Christina Mallory Chicoraske 49,062 9,480 74,064 132,606
Total 84,758 15,884 188,142 288,784

 

Percentage Absentee Early Voting Election Day TOTAL
Hooten 42.12% 40.32% 60.63% 54.08%
Chicoraske 57.88% 59.68% 39.37% 45.92%

This represents a flip of over 52,000 votes from the historical norm:

Party Actual Proposed* Difference % Change
Hooten 35,696 61,857 26,161 30.87%
Chicoraske 49,062 22,901 26,161 -30.87%
Total 84,758 84,758 52,322

Oklahoma County Court Clerk

Even the Oklahoma County Court Clerk’s race saw irregularities. in 2016 Rick Warren easily defeated Anastasia Pittman in absentee votes by a comfortable margin:

Candidate Absentee Early Voting Election Day TOTAL
Rick Warren (Rep)
19,286 9,368 123,725 152,379
Anastasia Pittman (Dem) 11,596 10,795 94,290 116,681
Total 30,882 20,163 218,015 269,060
Percentage Absentee Early Voting Election Day TOTAL
Warren 62.45% 46.46% 56.75% 56.63%
Pittman 37.55% 53.54% 43.25% 43.37%

In 2020, the reversal trend continued:

Candidate Absentee Early Voting Election Day TOTAL
Rick Warren (Rep)
37,540 6,768 119,978 164,286
Charles De Coune (Dem) 47,334 9,138 68,737 125,209
Total 84,874 15,906 188,715 289,495
Percentage Absentee Early Voting Election Day TOTAL
Warren 44.23% 42.55% 63.58% 56.75%
De Coune 55.77% 57.45% 36.42% 43.25%

This represents a +30,000 vote flip:

Party Actual Proposed* Difference % Change
Warren 37,540  53,004 15,464 18.22%
De Coune 47,334  31,870 15,464 -18.22%
Total 84,874 84,874 30,929

Oklahoma County Sheriff

Lastly, the trend even continues down to the County Sheriff races. In 2016, The Oklahoma County Sheriff’s race was nearly a dead-heat in absentee voting:

Candidate Absentee Early Voting Election Day TOTAL
Mike Christian (Rep)
15,338 8,301 106,559 130,198
John Whetsel (Dem) 15,653 11,832 112,687 140,172
Total 30,991 20,133 219,246 270,370
Percentage Absentee Early Voting Election Day TOTAL
Christian 49.49% 41.23% 48.60% 48.16%
Whetsel 50.51% 58.77% 51.40% 51.84%

This year the absentee vote was not even remotely close, with Democrat Wayland Cubit winning by nearly 16,000 votes:

Candidate Absentee Early Voting Election Day TOTAL
Tommie Johnson III (Rep)
34,971 6,374 112,277 153,622
Wayland Cubit (Dem) 50,468 9,587 77,216 137,271
Total 85,439 15,961 189,493 290,893
Percentage Absentee Early Voting Election Day TOTAL
Johnson III 40.93% 39.93% 59.25% 52.81%
Cubit 59.07% 60.07% 40.75% 47.19%

Because of the closeness of the 2016 race, the vote flip from historical norms is smaller, but still significant:

Party Actual Proposed* Difference % Change
Tommie Johnson III. 34,971 42,285 7,314 8.56%
Wayland Cubit 50,468 43,154 7,314 -8.56%
Total 85,439 85,439 14,629

Voter Registration Changes

While one could understand a targeted flip of presidential votes, and even senatorial or congressional votes, the potential flipping of down-ballot local races either represents systemic, egregious fraud; a massive swing of independent voters toward the Democrat party; or a massive surge of staunchly Democrat voters in a county that has been solidly Republican for years. To determine the likelihood of the latter two scenarios, we compared the change in registered voters from 2016-2020, and 2019-2020. If these numbers are legitimate, and there really was a surge of Democrat votes, it would be highly likely to see a surge in registered Democrat voters (considering most Independents would likely be split evenly). The numbers, however, don’t show that.

From 2016-2020, the number show a small, yet proportional change in voter registration:

Oklahoma County Voter Registration 2016-2020
Party 1-Nov-16 1-Nov-20 Difference
Republican 184,264 189,991 5,727
Democrat 161,257 164,628 3,371
Libertarian 901 3,385 2,484
Independent 70,029 83,799 13,770
TOTAL 416,451 441,803 25,352

From 2016 to 2019, there seems to have been a drop in overall registered voters, likely due to death, relocation, or graduation of college students. So the 2019-2020 change in registered voters, while larger than from 2016-2020, does show an overall increase of registered Democrat voters over Republican voters, but not by much:

Oklahoma County Voter Registration 2019-2020
Party 15-Jan-20 1-Nov-20 Difference
Republican 178,023 189,991 11,968
Democrat 151,337 164,628 13,291
Libertarian 2,650 3,385 735
Independent 75,037 83,799 8,762
TOTAL 407,047 441,803 34,756

Now compare those numbers with the difference in voter turnouts from 2016-2020, and you’ll notice a HEAVY swing towards Democrat votes in absentee voting:

Oklahoma County Presidential Voter Turnout Difference: 2016 v 2020
Party Absentee Early Voting Election Day Total Votes
Republican 12,020 -2,728 -5,811 3,481
Democrat 43,139 -973 -13,255 28,911
TOTAL 55,159 -3,701 -19,066 32,392

While some of the surge of Democrat absentee voting could be explained by the drop in Election Day voting due to COVID-19 concerns, that only accounts for 30% of the total increase in absentee Democrat voters.

When comparing the voting registrations to the overall voting trends, it gets even more alarming. While the Republicans added 11,968 new registered voters from 2019-2020, they only acquired 3,481 more votes than 2016; a 8,487 vote gap. Considering the overall enthusiasm for President Trump among Republicans, with some reports even showing a staggering 96% voting rate for the President among his own party, it is highly unlikely that he would lose 70% of the new registered Republicans votes.

Meanwhile, the Democrats only added 13,291 new voters, but added 28,911 new votes; a 15,620 vote gain, a 207% increase. Combine the lost Republican votes and the gain Democrat votes, and that represents a shift of 24,107 votes.

Even if you compare the 2016-2020 change in voter registrations to 2016-2020 voter turnout, the numbers look even more suspicious. The Republicans gained 5,727 voters, yet only picked up 3,481 new votes, a 60% conversion rate for a President that converted 96% Republican votes throughout the country. The Democrats, however, picked up only 3,371 new voters, but gained 28,911 new votes, an 857% increase…in the middle of a state that awarded all 77 counties to President Trump in 2016.

Conclusion

As we said above, we are NOT alleging fraud by the Oklahoma County Election Board. If at any time the counting machines were connected to the internet, even if it was just to upload the results to the server, it would have given outside hackers enough time to change the votes at the point of transfer, which is exactly what happened in the 6 states whose elections are in question. If even one vote was switched, it’s one vote too many.

The only way of ensuring our elections are secure is for our elected officials to demand a hand recount of all absentee ballots in Oklahoma County. If the numbers turn out to be the same as reported on election night, then we know our elections are secure (and that Republicans have a LOT of work to do before 2022). However, if we find that votes were indeed switched, even if it doesn’t change the results, then we must demand that ALL voting machines in the State of Oklahoma be immediately decommissioned and the Governor, legislature, and Oklahoma City Council take the steps necessary to protect our elections moving forward…starting with the City Council elections.

(Consequently, this represents a golden opportunity for enterprising patriots to create secure, American-made, American-owned voting machines.)

Oklahomans built this land with blood, sweat, and tears. We would be more than happy to help secure our liberty by volunteering to hand-count ballots in the meantime. The safety and security of our great state, and our Republic, demand nothing less.

COPYRIGHT © 2020 · IGNITE LIBERTY

 

Filed Under: 2020 Election Tagged With: 2020 Election

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

    Subscribe to our newsletter

    COPYRIGHT © 2022 · IGNITE LIBERTY · ALL RIGHTS RESERVED