by Dr. Amy Cerato and Dr. Eric Snyder
In 1994, President Bill Clinton commissioned a special committee to investigate allegations of government-sponsored radiation research on unknowing citizens during the Cold War. The President’s Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments studied newly declassified top-secret documents that showed human experimentation played an extensive role in the United States’ attempts to build and protect against weapons of mass destruction. The committee was charged not only with resolving questions of medical ethics but also with determining who was harmed and what appropriate compensation for those seeking justice would equate to. The 1000-page final report was released at a White House ceremony in October of 1995. This culminating report was extensive but was not exhaustive and thankfully, further investigation from one of the committee members, Dr. Jonathan Moreno, continued.
While he was attempting to discover the truth about radiation experiments on the American people during his 18-month Presidential Committee assignment, Dr. Moreno unearthed scores of references to malevolent biological and chemical weapons research on humans. Had the original committee’s charge been extended to the history and ethics of biological and chemical experiments, the final report would have likely exceeded 5,000 pages. This is because studies and documentation of chemical and biological agents in the military context have a more robust history than radiation research. The military studies did not always involve the development or use of weapons against an enemy, but instead, efforts were garnered to improve the performance of soldiers in battle. For example:
- Bavarian soldiers were given cocaine without their knowledge to see if the drug would help them overcome fatigue (1883)
- British Soldiers were provided the Typhoid vaccine when fighting in the South African Boer War (~1900)
- Soldiers were used to test the efficacy of gas masks and other protective breathing devices by exposing them to test clouds of bacteriological agents at Fort Detrick (the 1940’s)
- Soldiers were used to test mustard gas chambers in the Naval Research Laboratory (WWII)
- Soldiers were provided Lysergic Acid diethylamide (LSD), a psychoactive agent, to study mind-control (the 1950s)
- Soldiers were exposed to nerve gas agents when fighting in the 1991 Gulf War
Dr. Moreno’s pursuit of truth culminated in his seminal book titled, Undue Risk: Secret State Experiments on Humans. The book was published in 2000 and while the nature of the topic can be disturbing, the narrative poses serious questions about the role of government in the ethics of human experimentation. Dr. Moreno accurately points out that the military-medical experiments performed on civilians were just as unethical, gruesome, and egregious as what he found specific to military soldiers. Consider the following civilian experiments:
- The injected plutonium experiments conducted on working-class hospitalized patients without their knowledge or consent in the 1940s
- The Tuskegee study of untreated syphilis in over 400 poor, black sharecroppers from 1932-1972
- MKUltra, the illegal human experimentation program designed and undertaken by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to develop behavioral modification procedures using “truth” drugs like LSD and mescaline to aid in interrogations.
Our government agencies have a history of employing a lack of bioethics and morality when it comes to human experimentation. As one further explores Undue Risk, it becomes clear that deception, omission, and coercion were the preferred methods of operation over true informed consent and free choice. Dr. Moreno ended his book with this prediction…
If there is a single lesson to be learned from the story of military-medical human experiments, it is that we can expect them to continue in the future.” page 294
Is it not infuriating when the future proves the past? It is as if we aren’t able to learn from our mistakes and instead amplify the stakes. What Dr. Moreno predicted is here today as we remain in the midst of the largest medical experimentation program ever conducted on humans; an experimentation program whose impact will be felt for generations. This is why it is critical to document the events that have taken place since the start of Covid-19 so our history books provide a voice for the victims and hold accountable those in leadership positions.
To comprehend the scope and scale of the experimental mRNA gene therapies, consider the indisputable evidence garnered from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) contained within the Defense Medical Surveillance System (DMSS) that was recently added to the permanent congressional record during Senator Ron Johnson’s COVID-19: A second opinion panel held on January 24, 2022. Several brave military doctors and health care providers came forward to sound the alarm about the dramatic increases observed in certain diagnosis codes (health codes are assigned to patients to keep accurate records) in the first ten months of 2021. These reports were well above the prior 5-year average. Their sworn declaration provided the following evidence:
— a 300% increase in miscarriages (4,182 vs 1,499)
— a 300% increase in cancer diagnoses (114,645 vs 38,700)
— a 269% increase in myocardial infarction
— a 291% increase in Bell’s palsy
— a 467% increase in pulmonary embolisms
— a 471% increase in female infertility
— a 1,000% increase in neurological diagnoses (863,000 vs 82,000)
Thomas Renz, an individual we believe will eventually be recognized as an American hero, served as the lawyer representing the military health professionals. During the panel, Renz accurately pointed out that the 2020 diagnosis codes (the first year of Covid-19) for the same conditions listed above, do NOT show similar increases. This allows us to marginalize Covid-19 as a possible cause. Renz told a reporter for Blaze News that this was just “the tip of the iceberg,” as numerous other diagnosis categories have also increased exponentially. Renz presented a sworn declaration from one military doctor who came forward, which states,
It is my professional opinion that the major increases of the above-discussed instances of miscarriages, cancers, and disease were due to COVID-19 ‘vaccinations.’”
At this point, it doesn’t take Sherlock Holmes to figure out that the military doctor’s sworn declaration is accurate! Upon conducting a simple review of the adverse events reported in 2021 to the DMED, the United States’ Vaccine Adverse Event Reports (VAERS) system, Europe’s Eudravigilance, the British Yellowcard (UK), the Swiss Adverse, and WHO sponsored VigiaAccess, along with entities like Center for Medicare Services (CMS), it should be clear that serious adverse events (SAE) post-Covid-19-vaccination are not rare and continue to be reported at alarming rates. While not attempting to be humorous, this is our time to sound like a large law firm’s late-night advertisement for a class action suit against a recently approved FDA drug in the United States.
If you know of someone who has been injured or killed by these mRNA gene therapies please send their families to this website, “No More Silence,” which allows individuals and the families of individuals who have been injured or killed as a result of the C19 injection to tell their stories. We also encourage you to contact attorney Thomas Renz.
We hope to inspire people to visit this website as these individuals have no recourse with the pharmaceutical companies and their doctors often gaslight them without solutions for recovery. Perhaps the gaslighting occurs from medical professionals because the scope and scale of the devastation transcend the entirety of the medical field as the shots impact individuals differently based on dosage, ingredients, prior medical history, and other factors. These inherently evil shots seem to be decentralized in their ability to impact various systems and parts of the human body. In doing so, cardiologists, hematologists, neurologists, oncologists, endocrinologists, obstetricians, and others may not be connecting the dots. As such, we felt it would be advantageous to provide an overview of the major adverse event reporting categories so that individuals can share important resources. These adverse events include: cardiac, blood, cancers, neurological, autoimmune, and reproductive. This website also provides a repository of recent publications on various adverse event categories that is beneficial.
Cardiac Adverse Events (CAE)
Do our government officials really care about our health? Why have we not witnessed an emphasis on the importance of a balanced diet, vitamin supplementation, and physical exercise through our health departments and “elected” leaders? With the closing of gymnasiums, and fitness clubs during lockdowns, our public health policy promoted an increased consumption of fast food and Netflix binge-watching that certainly hit the heart of America as we now see the detrimental effect playing out in real-time. But how have the mRNA gene therapies impacted the physical heart of Americans as well as their entire cardiovascular systems? Would lifestyle changes, better diets, and additional fitness alter the impact of the mRNA gene therapies on individuals?
There is certainly evidence to suggest it would not, given the growing list of incredibly fit and healthy endurance athletes suffering from cardiac events. Suddenly, in 2021 and continuing in 2022, we have witnessed far too many injuries and deaths. At the time of this publication, there have been 603 cardiac events with 374 deaths reported in the international sporting community since January of 2021. Why didn’t we see this in 2020, or 2019, or the prior 20 years? This is well above a “normal” year according to the research, and anecdotally we rarely have heard of sudden cardiac arrest among athletes during competition. As we discussed in Chapter 8, the increase in cardiac issues among the general public is also growing at an alarming rate. On Saturday, January 29th, 2022, four soccer matches in the UK were halted because of medical incidents in the stands, not on the fields.
Apparently, the cardiovascular issues of myocarditis, heart attack, pulmonary embolisms, etc., are so prevalent in the UK that the media are now attempting to alter the narrative by indicating the cardiac issues stem from post-pandemic stress disorder(PPSD). Is PPSD like post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)? If so, we are confident that those suffering from physical ailments would likely prefer a therapist visit rather than a cardiologist. Is PPSD only applicable to those who have received the mRNA injection? Let’s be honest. There seems to be a strong correlation between vaccination and cardiac events given our own DMSS data indicating a 269% increase in myocardial infarction among our military members.
On a personal level, we know of individuals who have unfortunately died after accepting an mRNA injection. We also know work colleagues who have been diagnosed with myocarditis, subsequently ending many of the joys they used to experience through physical activity. Coupling these realities with a lack of autopsies to determine the cause of death (more on autopsy later) and the unwillingness of physicians to recognize the vaccine injured, families are left with no answers, closure, or legal recourse. So what is really going on?
In Pfizer’s inadequately short clinical trial with over 43,000 participants, it was found that there was a 5x increased risk from fatal heart attacks among the vaccinated over the placebo group (Table S4). Cardiac adverse events were also featured front and center at the October 2020 vaccine safety presentation to garner EUA approval. The EUA should have been dead-on-arrival, resulting in a death pledge to Big Pharma’s cash cow while saving untold human lives. The actual adverse events should have been communicated to the public prior to the mass mRNA gene therapy program rollout. Listing the accurate adverse events would have provided reason to hesitate, especially when our young and healthy children are being targeted. On February 1st, 2022 Pfizer requested US emergency approval for two doses of the three-dose “vaccine” for children under five years old even though the “vaccine” did not show efficacy in their trial. An approval would be wrongful, corrupt, and fiendish but unfortunately, it seems imminent.
But at this point is anyone really surprised at the level of corruption that seems to be pervasive in our society? Why did our government agencies fail to notice the cardiac event signals within the VAERS system? Why would they wait until the Israelis told us, when we had plenty of evidence that events were happening in the United States? To pediatricians and physicians, are you not concerned that many countries around the world have pulled the “vaccines” for those under 30 years of age due to elevated cardiac events? Again, this has been blacked out by our major media, but the list of nations is below.
As of January 27, 2022, Sweden decided against recommending COVID vaccines for kids aged 5-12 because there is no clear benefit in vaccinating them due to the low risk for serious disease in kids. What about the addition of tromethamine as an ingredient to the 5-11-year-old child dosage of the mRNA gene therapies? Was this to prevent cardiac events, as we know this was not an ingredient in the original doses for adults?
It is infuriating that the United States is missing from the list of nations banning these shots for our children. Apparently, our government’s and medical board’s position is that the mRNA jab causes heart problems in the youth of our international community but not the children of the United States. Please take a moment and analyze the dates of most of these vaccine suspensions in other nations. They correlate with the time that the FDA green-lighted vaccines for our 5-11-year-olds on October 29, 2021. Surely those FDA voting members are global enough to be reading this type of news from abroad.
But how many cases of pediatric myocarditis would we see in a typical year prior to the COVID-19 event? This paper established the pediatric background rate of myocarditis well before COVID-19 became a household name. The analysis of the hospital admissions with myocarditis in Finland occurring in patients aged 15 or younger from 2004-2014 showed that there were 213 pediatric admissions and the overall incidence rate was 1.95/100,000 person-years (4 cases/million/per year). If we extrapolate the incident rate using the United States population, we would diagnose an estimated total of 700 cases of myocarditis in a given year. But our current myocarditis numbers as of December 2021 reveal around 13,000 pediatric cases reported. Cardiologists believe it is the lipid nanoparticle (LNP) surrounding the spike protein that causes so many heart problems because the spike protein seeds the heart/brain, which we can see in the few autopsy reports that are available. A paper posted on July 20, 2021, provided evidence as to why the “vaccines” spike protein disrupts human cardiac function. See images from Chapter 11 and the impact of LNP’s on mice lungs. It shows conclusive evidence of the inflammatory effect resulting from injecting LNPs into mice bodies.
In May of 2021, the U.S.’s COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Technical (VaST) Working Group, within the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), finally found the time to discuss nearly 500 reports of heart inflammation in vaccinated adults under age 30. This number continues to increase weekly as we track the VAERS data. While the CDC “investigated” this phenomenon, independent researchers also started analyzing heart inflammation after “vaccination” and discovered that myocarditis and pericarditis were significantly underreported. According to researchers, the “mean monthly number of cases of myocarditis or myocarditis during the pre-vaccine period was 16.9 versus 27.3 during the vaccine period. The mean numbers of pericarditis cases during the same periods were 49.1 and 78.8, respectively.” While myocarditis was more common in children and males, pericarditis reports tend to affect adults. Regardless, it is clear that we have witnessed a significant increase in myocarditis and pericarditis case rates post-vaccination.
In October of 2021, a report on “Myocarditis Adverse Events in the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System in Association with COVID-19 Injectable Biological Products,” was published and then withdrawn by the editor. The report used VAERS data to examine cardiac adverse events, primarily myocarditis, reported following injection of the first or second dose of the COVID-19 injectable products:
Myocarditis rates reported in VAERS were significantly higher in youths between the ages of 13 to 23 with ∼80% occurring in males. Within 8 weeks of the public offering of COVID-19 products to the 12-15-year-old age group, we found 19 times the expected number of myocarditis cases in the vaccination volunteers over background myocarditis rates for this age group. In addition, a 5-fold increase in myocarditis rate was observed subsequent to dose 2 as opposed to dose 1 in 15-year-old males. A total of 67% of all cases occurred with BNT162b2. Of the total myocarditis AE reports, 6 individuals died (1.1%) and of these, 2 were under 20 years of age – 1 was 13. These findings suggest a markedly higher risk for myocarditis subsequent to COVID-19 injectable product use than for other known vaccines, and this is well above known background rates for myocarditis.”
Imagine if your loved one suffered from this injury due to the experimental vaccination. According to a publication in Circulation Research, 27% never deviate from regular heart function, 26% fully recover, 34% improve but do not fully recover and 13% never recover from a myocarditis diagnosis. The percentages provided show how debilitating this injury can be as 13% of myocarditis cases end up with progressive heart failure. Sadly, there are children who will be in that 13% category. We already know this given the cases at Monte Vista Christian School in California where vaccinations were mandated for all students. It is devastating, especially because we know that 86% of kids’ cases of myocarditis end up in the hospital – indicating the injury is not “mild.” What is also clear, is that a young child is far more likely to be injured and diagnosed with myocarditis after vaccination than ever to be hospitalized with a COVID-19 infection. Remember the infection survival rate for 0-19-years old is 99.99973% according to Stanford researchers!
Myocarditis increases in the U.S correlate with increases globally. A study from Hong Kong found that 1 out of 2,300 12-17-year-old boys (217/million doses) who received both Pfizer doses suffered acute myocarditis or pericarditis. Most of the risk came after the second dose. The risk is very similar in college-age men. Based on the passive surveillance report in the US, the risk of myocarditis after receiving mRNA based COVID-19 vaccines was increased across multiple age and sex strata and was highest after the second vaccination dose in adolescent males and young men (males aged 12-15, 71/million doses, males aged 16-17, 106/million doses, males aged 18-24, 56/million doses). An additional report by Hoag, Krug, Stevenson, and Mandrola (2021) found that,
for boys with no underlying health conditions, the chance of either cardiac adverse events (CAE) or hospitalization from CAE, after their second dose of mRNA vaccination are considerably higher than their 120-day risk of COVID-19 hospitalization, even at times of peak disease prevalence. The long-term consequences of this vaccine-associated cardiac inflammation are not yet fully defined and should be studied.”
The researchers recommended that the US consider following the example of countries like Germany and Norway in holding off on recommending COVID-19 vaccination of healthy children who are at low risk of developing serious disease from a natural infection. We agree with these researchers but apparently the FDA safety panel does not as they voted 17-0 with one abstention to approve the primary shot series in our 5-11-year-olds, and more recently the FDA approved boosters for children age 12 and up.
The Pfizer-BioNTech product is not the only vaccine that causes issues. This is important to think about given that individuals are now permitted to “mix and match” vaccinations with their choice of Pfizer BioNTech, Moderna, or Johnson & Johnson. How many studies were conducted using mixology? Were there ever any trials where Moderna, Pfizer, and J&J swapped vaccines and examined the impact on humans? We do not have any evidence of trials occurring which makes this CDC recommendation even more egregious. It is actually so unfathomable that we had to include a below in Figure 2 for evidence.
More recently, a December 2021 publication in Nature warned that the risk of developing a form of heart inflammation is higher for people younger than 40 after receiving Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine than it is from contracting COVID-19. Researchers found 15 excess cases per 1 million people who received a second dose of the vaccine compared to 10 extra cases of myocarditis following a positive COVID-19 test (we could not confirm if PCR was used). An additional publication found that the incidence of heart inflammation was 5.1 times higher for males between 18 and 24 who got a second dose of Moderna’s vaccine versus those in the same population who received a second dose of Pfizer’s vaccine. Even with these studies being published, federal regulators pressed Pfizer to submit a request for emergency authorization for children ages 2-4. What a shocking revelation! It is as if federal regulators and big pharma want to inoculate every human on earth regardless of if the shot works or causes harm.
If you would like to learn more about the increasing number of children adversely affected permanently by the COVID-19 inoculation, we encourage you to listen to this pediatric cardiologist discuss the harm these vaccinations have caused to our children’s physical health. Dr. Milhoan is joined by a child psychiatrist Dr. McDonald who discusses the ways in which the harmful government’s response to the pandemic has negatively impacted our children’s cognitive, psychological and mental health. Dr. Mark McDonald, recently published a book that details his observations in, “United States of Fear: How America Fell Victim to a Mass Delusional Psychosis.” It is a brutally honest depiction of how social isolation, masks, and constant fear messaging are destroying our children. Every administrator, educator, or parent who still feels masks and/or social distancing are worth it or feels like masking is simply a “neutral” mitigation strategy to placate those delusional with fear, should watch the video and read this book. The science is very clear about our children; they need to be allowed to have normal childhoods, mask-free and without inoculations that can cause heart problems and other adverse events.
The information provided is only a preview of the literature on cardiac adverse events and vaccinations. To help educate yourself and your pediatrician and other physicians, we have compiled 143 studies and linked them below. These studies investigate the impact of experimental vaccinations and cardiac events in individuals.
Table 1: Myocarditis, Myopericarditis, and other Research on Cardiac Issues and Covid-19 Shots.
If our military data provides evidence that a 467% increase in pulmonary embolisms exists, then the question becomes, what causes these events? We now know, thanks to brave researchers, that the COVID-19 infection and gene-therapy inoculations can begin the formation of microscopic blood clots throughout the body. The micro-clots result from spike proteins that damage fine blood vessels. Early on, doctors were noting that COVID-19 was not a typical viral disease and patients were dying as a result of micro clots formed in the lungs that spread to cause deadly damage to organs throughout the body. Dr. Brian Bull was quoted as saying that,
clotting in really sick COVID-19 patients is not something trivial and unimportant – it may well be fundamental to what is going on.”
Not only should doctors have pivoted more quickly to use appropriate early treatment to prevent clotting events, but Big Pharma should have paid attention to these early clinical observations in COVID-19 patients and reconsidered their spike-protein-based gene therapy solution. Big Pharma should have never used a non-unique spike protein to confer immunity to SARS-CoV-2 when it was known to cause major problems within the body. The pharmaceutical companies and their payroll knowingly enveloped this spike protein in lipid nanoparticles and told citizens that it would stay at the intramuscular site of injection and drain through the lymphatic system, not the bloodstream. Unfortunately, we now know that lipid nanoparticles carry the spike protein throughout the entirety of our vascular system and organs, all the while destroying our blood vessel walls and creating clots. The spike protein mRNA shot solution is far more dangerous in much of the population than what the gain-of-function researchers (which included the involvement of both US and China researchers) released from Wuhan; albeit just as unethical and malicious.
Were researchers purposeful in developing a product that produces micro-clots more frequently than macro? Micro-clots are not easily found through conventional medical scanning and imaging technologies and the clinical symptoms depend on the organs that are most strongly affected. If these clots are pumped to the lungs, they may be diagnosed as pulmonary embolisms. If they reach the brain, they can cause a stroke or confusion. If they lodge in the heart, they can cause a heart attack, especially if an individual is suffering from myocarditis, pericarditis, or myopericarditis. If clots lodge in the smaller blood vessels that provide oxygen to the hands or feet, they can cause those limbs to go numb. Clots in other organs, such as the liver or kidneys could cause those organs to fail.
Dr. Charles Hoffe wrote an open letter to the Canadian Ministry of Health in April 2021 detailing the large numbers of severe adverse events (1 in 225) he had seen in his practice and asking how to treat these vaccine-injured patients. Using the d-dimer test, which measures the amount of degraded fibrin in the blood, Dr. Hoffe found that 62% of his patients (hundreds) had test results indicating the presence of micro-clots. These micro-clots form after the spike proteins were introduced to the human body. They cause the small blood vessel walls to become rough and uneven, which disrupts blood flow and can result in serious health complications. Our blood vessels are supposed to be smooth so that our blood flows unimpeded.
Doctors have attempted to understand this blood clotting phenomenon by looking at an individual’s blood before and after vaccination. Healthy normal red blood cells (RBC) look nice and round, with a dark center (Figure 3B First Picture). After vaccination, the imagery shows the blood cells start to crumble, nuclei become destroyed, and the cells start to clump together (Figure 3B Middle). After some time, the red blood cells seem to lose their original round shape and create a stacked “money roll structure” or “rouleaux” formation (Figure 3a background and Figure 3b Last Picture far right). While the nuclei destruction and dismembering is shown in imaging, it is also plausible that in addition, the electron charge of the RBC becomes positive post-vaccination which causes them to connect.
It is unclear if only some people are prone to this breakdown in red blood cells after vaccination or if all people are. Does rouleaux happen in individuals who were naturally infected? Does the batch number matter? What controls this phenomenon? If money roll structures or rouleaux occur in everyone who has been vaccinated, what are the long-term effects of having irregular and coagulated red blood cells? We know that the surface area certainly decreases when red blood cells combine into long rolls, which would decrease the amount of oxygen-carrying capacity. We also know that the clumping and rolling of these red blood cells would likely contribute to clotting and damaged blood vessels.
But is there anything that can be done to reverse this alteration of the red blood cells back to their original form? Do these structures persist in perpetuity or do they run their course in 100-120 days like a normal red blood cell before being recycled by macrophages (white blood cells)?
One can only hope that the macrophages will recycle these mutated red blood cells after 3-4 months in circulation and new healthy red blood cells are produced in the bone marrow without any further structural degradation. These pictures may help explain why serious adverse events typically occur within weeks of the inoculation. What if these red blood cell abnormalities occurred after every inoculation and persisted for 4 months? Does this mean that, and individuals’ risk of blood clotting and serious adverse events is elevated for a third of a year every year? It would be interesting to see studies following vaccinated individuals over time looking at their red-blood cell structure and d-dimer levels before and after each inoculation.
On December 16, 2021, a panel of advisers to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) unanimously voted to recommend the agency tell the public that the Moderna and Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines were preferred to the Johnson and Johnson (J&J) injection after hearing this presentation on a serious combination of blood clotting and low blood platelet levels, particularly in middle-aged women. What is interesting about this unanimous vote, is the fact that in doing so the CDC recognized conclusively that clotting and low platelet levels are concerning. Why wouldn’t this remain true for Pfizer and Moderna mRNA batches given the reports of thrombosis to VAERS? Are the ingredients really that different? Are the J&J vaccinations not deadly enough to continue their use? The post-vaccination thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) has been seen at higher than background rates in people who have gotten the J&J vaccine. About 17 million doses of J&J’s shot have been administered in the country to date with 54 confirmed cases through August 31st of blood clotting called cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST). But a review and analysis of reported thrombosis as an adverse event after Pfizer, Moderna or AstraZeneca also occurred and death was the most common outcome. Time from vaccination to admission was 3 days in all cases. Why not ban all of the inoculations?
So how do you or your loved ones know if micro-clotting is happening in your body? The d-dimer test is the gold standard used to identify the presence of micro-clots as physicians have found that micro-clotting does not present itself using traditional imaging tests. This is important to understand if you or a loved one presents with symptoms and your doctor cannot find anything wrong. The micro clots can also be found in people suffering from ‘long-Covid.’ Thankfully, it was found after conducting a nationwide study of over 37,500 children with RT-PCR verified infection and a control group of over 78,000, that long-covid in children is rare and mainly of short duration.
Those adults who may be suffering from long-Covid-19 may want to have their d-dimer levels measured and then talk with their doctors about anti-inflammatories, antivirals, or antiplatelet and anticoagulation regimens like Help (heparin-induced, extracorporeal, lipoprotein/fibrinogen, precipitation) apheresis that filters micro clots in a dialysis-style treatment. The possibility of an elevated risk of stroke and heart attacks is real in long-Covid-19 patients, as well as in vaccinated individuals. Regardless of vaccination status or natural infection, individuals deserve a diagnosis for their symptoms and access to medicines and procedures that will reduce their d-dimer levels, and subsequently, eliminate micro clots within their vasculature.
Below, we have again compiled a plethora of research on blood clotting and its impact on Covid-19 patients. Please share these studies with your doctor or healthcare provider as we attempt to find an antidote to the spike protein circulating throughout the body from a Covid-19 infection and the Covid-19 inoculation.
Table 2: Thrombosis (blood clotting and Covid-19 Research)
Table 3: Thrombocytopenia (platelets issues and Covid-19 Research)
Autoimmune Disease and Cancer
Several doctors have reported an increase in autoimmune diseases and cancers since the COVID-19 inoculation rollout. A board-certified pathologist and owner/operator of a diagnostics lab, Dr. Ryan Cole has been outspoken from the beginning of 2021 about what he has observed. In this video, Dr. Cole postulates a 20 fold increase in endometrial cancers and is concerned that the vaccines are causing serious autoimmune issues. His lab and practice have witnessed more quickly growing melanomas in younger patients, herpes, shingles, mononucleosis, and a “huge uptick” in HPV when “looking at the cervical biopsies of women.” Other physicians like Dr. Craig Wax, a New Jersey family physician tweeted his concerns about the injections “turning on oncogenes and causing cancer in young people.” Did this result in other physicians supporting his inferences? It does not seem so publicly, and instead, Dr. Wax’s twitter account was suspended less than 48 hours later. At this point, if you are struggling to understand why this type of censorship continues, please refrain from watching the forthcoming Superbowl LVI and season five of Yellowstone and start researching! This information is incredibly important.
Other professionals continue to speak out regarding increases in cancer rates. During Senator Ron Johnson’s COVID-19: A second opinion panel held on January 24, 2022, Attorney Thomas Renz revealed that military officials utilized the DMSS and provided sounded the safety alarms from the rollout of the vaccines. The military doctors show an increase in cancers by 300% over the five-year average (114,645 vs 38,700). It is devastating.
A disturbing case report was recently published in Frontiers in Medicine Pathology in late November 2021 and details a quickly moving lymphoma following a Pfizer booster. A PET scan was taken prior to and again eight days after the Pfizer booster shot and showed a 5.3-fold increase in whole-body total lesion glycolysis (TLG), a reliable predictor of cancers (See Figure 4).
Such a rapid evolution would be highly unexpected in the natural course of the disease. The paper concludes that “Since mRNA vaccination is known to induce enlargement and hypermetabolic activity of draining lymph nodes, it is reasonable to postulate that it was the trigger of the changes observed.” The researchers recommend that in a person with this type of cancer, “the use of mRNA vaccines should clearly be avoided while other types of vaccines might be considered.” Below we have included additional research studies analyzing autoimmune diseases and lymphadenopathy.
Table 4: Autoimmune Diseases and Covid-19 Vaccinations (Guillain-Barré Syndrome)
|Autoimmune Disease Research and Covid-19 Vaccinations (Guillain-Barre’ Syndrome)|
|Study 1||Study 2||Study 3||Study 4||Study 5||Study 6||Study 7|
|Study 8||Study 9||Study 10||Study 11||Study 12||Study 13||Study 14|
|Study 15||Study 16||Study 17||Study 18||Study 19||Study 20||Study 21|
|Study 22||Study 23||Study 24||Study 25||Study 26||Study 27||Study 28|
|Study 29||Study 30||Study 31||Study 32||Study 33||Study 34||Study 35|
|Study 36||Study 37||Study 38||Study 39||Study 40||Study 41||Study 42|
Table 5: Cancer Research and Covid-19 Vaccinations (Lymphadenopathy and other Oncological Investigations)
|Cancer Research and Covid-19 Vaccinations|
|Study 1||Study 2||Study 3||Study 4||Study 5||Study 6||Study 7|
|Study 8||Study 9||Study 10||Study 11||Study 12||Study 13||Study 14|
|Study 15||Study 16||Study 17||Study 18||Study 19||Study 20||Study 21|
|Study 22||Study 23||Study 24||Study 25||Study 26||Study 27||Study 28|
|Study 29||Study 30||Study 31||Study 32||Study 33||Study 34|
Neurodegenerative and Prion Diseases
In May of 2021 when Professor Byram Bridle was disclosing the FOIA request on the Pfizer vaccine bio-distribution data, he mentioned that the spike protein caused blood clots, inflammation, and scarring leading to a large number of cardiovascular and neurological symptoms, several of which would be irreversible. Dr. Bridle noted that the spike protein was associated with Lewy body formation, which is linked to prion diseases. He expressed concern that the vaccines could increase prion-like diseases (i.e., dementia, Alzheimer’s (currently, more than 6 million Americans are living with Alzheimer’s), and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD)). A prion is a type of protein that can trigger normal proteins in the brain to fold abnormally. While some experts don’t agree that neurodegenerative diseases like dementia and Alzheimer’s are truly Prion diseases, they do agree that both have pathogenic overlap.
Dr. Seneff, a Senior Research Scientist at MIT’s Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, agrees with Dr. Brindle and “anticipates that there will be long-term damage that won’t instantly be linked to the vaccine.” While developments, such as an increase in auto-immune and neurodegenerative diseases, may take 10-15 years before manifesting themselves. Dr. Seneff foresees an increase in CJD and an epidemic of Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and ALS disease, which people will get at an increasingly younger age. Prion-like diseases are NOT curable at this time, unlike COVID-19; it is a death sentence. If Prion disease is rare, how do we explain the number of excess cases of prion disease reported in VAERS? What about the 1000% increase in neurological issues affecting our military (e.g., 82,000 vs 863,000 in one year)? Is it possible to completely deny that these individuals are suffering from Prion disease due to vaccination? The vaccines are NOT safe and effective.
Again, we’ve included additional research studies below for you to share with individuals. This includes research on Bell’s Palsy which has 13,348 reported adverse events in VAERS as of January 21, 2022. Bell’s Palsy normally surfaces in individuals who have latent viral infections like Herpes, Varicella, and Shingles. It is also known to be correlated with Parkinson’s disease later in life. As you review these studies, it seems logical to conclude that our bodies’ latent ability to keep viruses and cancer-causing agents from “waking up” and causing disease symptoms to surface is negatively impacted by the Covid-19 inoculations.
Table 6: Additional research on Prion and Prion-like diseases occurring after vaccination:
|Prion Disease and Covid-19 Vaccination Research|
|Study 1||Study 2||Study 3||Study 4||Study 5||Study 6|
|Bell’s Palsy and Covid-19 Vaccination Research|
|Study 1||Study 2||Study 3||Study 4||Study 5||Study 6||Study 7|
|Study 8||Study 9||Study 10||Study 11||Study 12||Study 13||Study 14|
|Study 15||Study 16||Study 17|
Reproductive System and Pregnancy
If the information provided thus far is not enough to make you wary of the shots. The following section will provide evidence of perhaps the most grossly incoherent recommendation ever made by our medical establishment as individuals and agencies aggressively encouraged pregnant women to take the shots. Below we will explore commentary, studies, and reported adverse events that indicate the shots have the potential to impact the reproductive systems of individuals.
According to Dr. Michael Yeadon, retired former Vice President of Respiratory Research at Pfizer, a 2012 study on mRNA shots showed concentrated levels of the substance in the ovaries and testicular area of rats and mice. He believes it was a deliberate choice to concentrate the spike protein shot in reproductive areas where the spike protein looks similar to the essential protein in pregnancy. He is quoted below:
I wrote with a German doctor 8 months ago, a petition to the European Medicines Agency. And amongst several concerns we had, one was that the spike protein is faintly similar, not very strongly, but faintly similar to an essential protein in your placenta. Something that’s absolutely required for both fertilization and formation and maintenance of the placenta. So you can’t get pregnant and have a successful pregnancy if this protein is damaged in any way. And we noticed that the coronavirus spike protein is similar. Similar enough that I would worry.
And I wanted them to do some experiments, hopefully to rule out the possibility that when you vaccinate the person, who then makes spike proteins, and they develop an immune response against this spike protein; my worry was that there would be an echo. You know. A faint signal that would potentially bind this similar protein in the placenta. And the studies just came out a few weeks ago and it says, exactly, what I was worried about.
15 women were given Pfizer vaccines, they drew blood samples every few days, and they measured antibodies against the spike protein; which took several weeks to appear. They also measured antibodies against the placenta. And they found within the first 1-4 days an increase of two and a half to three times – a 300% increase, in the antibodies against their own placenta. In the first 4 days. Um, so, I’m sorry to say this, but that is a vaccine induced autoimmune attack, on their own placenta.
And I think you can only expect that [that] is happening in every woman of child-bearing potential, [and] is generating antibodies against this critical protein required for fertilization and successful pregnancy. Now, what the effect will be we can’t be certain. Again it can’t be benign. I don’t know whether it’s enough to cause first trimester losses. But I would think it would, because I’ve looked at the literature, and women who are unfortunate enough to have what are called autoimmune diseases, tend to have a higher rate of first trimester losses. And what this vaccine does is induce an autoimmune response.
So, I’m here to warn you that if you are of child-bearing potential, or younger – so, not at menopause, I would strongly recommend you do not accept these vaccines. Thank you.”
See link to story here.
As of September 2021, more than 30,000 reports of changes to periods and unexpected vaginal bleeding have been reported as adverse effects of the Covid-19 injection through the UK’s Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency. As of January 12th, 2022 a total of 47,421 suspected reactions relating to a variety of menstrual disorders have been reported including heavier than usual periods, delayed periods and unexpected vaginal bleeding. These suspected reactions have also been reported by an additional 37,003 individuals in the YellowCard database (as report may contain more than one suspected reaction). This is following approximately 51.6 million COVID-19 “vaccine” doses administered to women as of January 12, 2022. The Yellow Card report goes on to dismiss the severity of these reports and gaslights those women who have experienced menstrual dysregulation:
the number of reports of menstrual disorders and vaginal bleeding is low in relation to both the number of people who have received COVID-19 vaccines to date and how common menstrual disorders are generally. The menstrual changes reported are mostly transient in nature. There is no evidence to suggest that COVID-19 vaccines will affect fertility and your ability to have children. Whilst uncomfortable or distressing, period problems are extremely common and stressful life events can disrupt menstrual periods.”
Are we allowed to talk about this? What about a stressful decision to take an injection without any data? What about the fact that this injection can fundamentally change the way your body functions? How many women have not reported their irregularities? The menstrual and reproductive problems can be serious in some cases, and they are certainly not rare. The VAERS database supports the findings in the UK and consists of 22,421 reported menstrual disorders and 8,394 vaginal/uterine hemorrhages. Surely a hemorrhage is not a normal problem that physicians would brush under the rug. Figure 5 below includes adverse events that have been reported and pertain specifically to reproductive health.
Why in January of 2021, did the World Health Organization recommend against pregnant women receiving a COVID-19 vaccine? A week later, the agency changed its guidance and advised everyone (other than children at the time) on planet earth to take the shots, including pregnant women. What changed during that week-long period? Did new data surface?
We do not believe so, especially since we know that the first pregnancy trial for the vaccines did not begin until February of 2021(Clinical Trial # NCT04754594) and data collection will not be complete until August of 2022). It is difficult to fathom that pregnant women were put in a situation where fear of Covid-19 infection could result in the participation of an experiment that puts the life of mom and the baby at risk of unknown adverse events. Shame on us for not conducting appropriate trials prior to the approval.
All approved inoculations (Pfizer, Moderna, J&J, etc) have been administered under “Emergency Use Authorization.” and we know that 35,000+ women (4.7% of pregnant women) were vaccinated as of April 26, 2021. These women also enrolled in the v-safe registry program. Why would pregnant women be excluded from preauthorization clinical trials, but then subsequently encouraged to take the inoculation with limited and fraudulent human data? According the May 2021 FDA document “Vaccines to Prevent C19 EUA” page 10 (2b) states,
A final study report, if available, for a Developmental and Reproductive Toxicology (DART) study, or the timeline for study completion and submission of the final study report, should be provided in order to inform potential emergency use of the vaccine in pregnant women.”
By vaccinating pregnant women prior to having any safety data, the spirit of the statement above was violated. The inclusion of “if available” and “or” statements was purposeful as these companies attempt to skirt legal liability. So much for morals and ethics! We rewrote the language below as it should read:
A final study report for a Developmental and Reproductive Toxicology (DART) study, including the timeline for study completion and submission of the final study report, should be provided. The data from the report should be reviewed by independent researchers for accuracy prior to emergency use authorization approval of the vaccine in pregnant women.”
Is it not peculiar that within Pfizer’s documentation on how they will conduct their Phase 1/2/3 placebo-controlled, randomized, observer-blind, dose-finding study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, immunogenicity, and efficacy of their mRNA vaccine, it states clearly in Section 8.3.5 that:
Exposure to the study intervention under study during pregnancy or breastfeeding and occupational exposure are reportable to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of investigator awareness.”
Pfizer lists that an exposure during pregnancy (EDP) occurs when:
- a female participant is found to be pregnant while receiving the inoculation,
- A male participant who received the inoculation exposes a female partner prior to or around the time of conception,
- a female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having been exposed to the inoculation by inhalation or skin contact, or
- a male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the inoculation by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to or around the time of conception.
If exposure through inhalation or skin contact alone warrants a reportable event due to safety concerns, then shouldn’t injecting a pregnant woman with an experimental elixir be forbidden?
As referenced above, Pfizer pregnancy trials are described here with a start date of February 16, 2021 and a completion date of August 24, 2022. With regards to Moderna, an article found here summarizes Moderna’s clinical trials in pregnant women. The start date for Moderna’s trial was July 22, 2021 and the end date is January 6, 2024. Without even finishing the clinical trials or releasing any safety data, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) says that pregnant women can receive a vaccine. But the CDC also acknowledges there is limited data available about the safety of COVID vaccines for people who are pregnant. What about those women who have already taken the shot? Under EUA, Pfizer is required to follow-up with individuals post inoculation if an adverse event is reported. Results of Pfizer post-authorization reports through February 28, 2021 (roughly two months of data) were leaked in November of 2021 and the reported pregnancy safety data were worrisome.
Of the 270 unique pregnancies included in the case evaluation, we have information on 29; there were 23 spontaneous abortions (miscarriages), 2 premature births with neonatal death, 2 spontaneous abortions with intrauterine death, 1 spontaneous abortion with neonatal death, and 1 normal outcome with 5 “outcomes pending.” But note also “no outcome was provided for 238 pregnancies.” That means that of 29 pregnancies with known outcomes, 28 resulted in fetal death (96.5%). Where is the information on the remaining 238 (their numbers don’t quite add up) unique pregnancies? How can Pfizer be allowed to get away with such imprecise data collection and reporting? Even if it was 28 deaths in 270 pregnancies (assuming the “outcome unknown” pregnancies were normal), that is a 10.4% death rate. Is that acceptable? And how can these results be used to unequivocally back the statement “the vaccine is safe and effective in pregnancy?” Neither 10.4% nor 96.5% would be considered safe in our professional opinion.
The Pfizer post-authorization safety report should have been enough to STOP inoculating pregnant women immediately, but since no one in charge was willing to step up and do the right thing, many OB/GYN’s continued to parrot the narrative lest they lose their license. The fetal deaths reported to the VAERS database, as of January 14, 2022, continues to climb with 3,147 – 3,527 fetal deaths. If the under-reporting factor (URF) as calculated using the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) for spontaneous abortions is 49, then there could be upwards of 154,203 – 172,823 fetal deaths.
What is more concerning is the continued pattern that exists within our medical publications. On June 17, 2021, preliminary findings of the pregnancy trials were published in the New England Journal of Medicine. On October 14, 2021 corrections to the initial publication were released to the public. The CDC-sponsored article by Shimabukaro et al. (2021) either purposefully manipulated or accidentally misrepresented data from the mRNA pregnancy trials related to the risk of spontaneous abortion in EARLY pregnancy. The authors muddied the waters through variable alteration (i.e., what constitutes periods of exposure, how outcomes were reported and utilized to define cohorts of women). (See Supplemental Documentation).
For the record, Dr. Shimabukaro is the deputy director of the CDC’s Immunization Safety Office. On June 10, 2021, Dr. Shimabukuro reported no increased risk of myocarditis using data from the Vaccine Safety Database (VSD) to the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC). Two weeks after Dr. Shimabukaro’s presentation, on June 25th, 2021, however, the US FDA issued an advisory on the risk of myocarditis and pericarditis from Pfizer/Biontech Bnt162b2/Comirnaty vaccines. The section in this chapter on cardiac issues proves conclusively that myocarditis is a major risk.
Upon re-analysis of the Shimabukaro, et al (2021) data it was found that the “cumulative incidence of spontaneous abortion is 7 to 8 times higher than the original results” indicating that those who received the shots prior to 20 weeks had spontaneous abortion rates of 104/127 (81.8%). Yes, by accurately analyzing the women who received the shot prior to 20 weeks, the percentage of spontaneous abortions went from 12.6% overall (104/827) to 81.8% (104/127) if the shot was taken prior to 20 weeks! The re-analysis paper concluded that “Caution should be exercised in the administration of vaccines in pregnancy, as indicated by the possible association between the exposure to influenza vaccines containing H1N1pdm09 (2010–11 and 2011–12) and spontaneous abortion. The authors concluded:
Considering the evidence presented here, we suggest the immediate withdrawal of mRNA vaccine use in pregnancy (Category X) and those breastfeeding, alongside the withdrawal of mRNA vaccines to children or those of child-bearing age in the general population, until more convincing data relating to the safety and long-term impacts on fertility, pregnancy, and reproduction are established in these groups.”
We agree with the authors’ conclusion and even Pfizer admits that “available data on Comirnaty administered to pregnant women are insufficient to inform vaccine-associated risks in pregnancy,” and “it is not known whether Comirnaty is excreted in human milk” as “data are not available to assess the effects of Comirnaty on the breastfed infant” (page 14 talks about pregnancy and lactation concerns) Can we at least FINISH the pregnancy trials before we allow the CDC to assure us that “everything is all good?” Clearly, everything is not!
Like us, Dr. Noorchashm is clearly troubled by the narrative to vaccinate pregnant women. He wrote an open letter regarding Shimabukaro’s paper because the mainstream media and the CDC misused the paper to encourage indiscriminate vaccination of pregnant women. The study by Shimabukuro et. al. only included a total of 78 patients with SARS-CoV-2 infections (Table 3); 56 before vaccination, 10 infections </= days after first eligible dose of vaccination and 12 had infections > 14 days after the first eligible dose.
Any public health expert or even member of the laity could easily recognize that 78 patients, some of whom may have had natural infections months prior to their vaccination, is a totally insufficient subset analysis to be able to claim safety with any degree of statistical confidence. Additionally, [the authors] have made no effort to even determine if the recently infected women included in the tier study experienced any more severe symptoms than their uninfected counterparts. So not only is this subset under-powered to answer a safety question, it is also totally under-analyzed for evidence pointing to a potential safety concern.”
All of the safety data presented conclusively show that the Covid-19 inoculations are unsafe for women during pregnancy and lactation, as well as those who wish to become pregnant. However, according to the CDC’s website, data collected from the CDC and U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) safety monitoring systems have not identified “any safety concerns for pregnant people who were vaccinated or their babies.”
It is unclear why these agencies still recommend inoculations during pregnancy given the reported adverse events in multiple pharmacovigilance databases and research publications. The Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch (AFHSB) released their database query that showed a 300% increase in miscarriages (4,182 vs 1,499) and a 471% increase in female infertility. These numbers are statistically significant, and the information being disclosed should be enough evidence that we should halt vaccinations in premenopausal women and pregnant women immediately.
Dr. Robert Malone, who is credited as one of many involved with the creation of mRNA technology at the Salk Institute in 1988, has stated that the spike protein does not stay in the injection site but travels throughout the body and can attach to cells in the brain, heart, liver, kidney, and ovaries. We were provided evidence of this in May of 2021 when the Pfizer vaccine bio-distribution data was FOIA’d by the Japanese. The report (Table 188.8.131.52B) showed that the lipid nanoparticles delivered substantial doses of mRNA to female ovaries and that the spike protein that is produced causes blood clots, inflammation, and scarring leading to a large number of cardiovascular and neurological symptoms.
Conclusive proof that the spike proteins end up in every major human organ was found during an autopsy performed on a vaccinated individual. The first postmortem study in a patient vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 was published in June 2021, and examined the autopsy of an 86-year-old man who had received a single dose of the Covid-19 vaccine but died a month later after becoming infected with the coronavirus (the Covid-19 positive PCR test did not occur until day 24 after vaccination, and six days after hospitalization). Why did it take months to produce the first research paper detailing a post-vaccination autopsy? Did Pfizer conduct autopsies of the 5 individuals who received the Covid-19 inoculations and then died of heart attacks during their clinical trials? If not, why?
There have been more than 10,000 reported American deaths from the VAERS database alone since January of 2021. Where are all the autopsies? Why haven’t white papers, peer-reviewed publications, and independent analyses surfaced in large numbers? Apparently overall autopsy rates have fallen from 25% to less than 5% over the past four decades. But why are the CDC, FDA, and HHS, among others, not demanding autopsies or testing vaccine samples and making those reports public?
This would be especially important during an emergency use authorization period for a pharmaceutical with inadequate clinical trial data and no long-term safety studies. Why haven’t our elected officials investigated and held Big Pharma accountable to produce safe products? In Oklahoma, we have 44 deaths reported to VAERS due to vaccinations, would it not be prudent for the state to conduct autopsies on these individuals immediately?
We do not know how long (time) the spike proteins are produced in the body. We also do not know how many (the quantity) spike proteins are produced in the body post-injection. But because the antibodies to the spike protein are higher compared to the respiratory infection, we can anecdotally infer that a person can receive a larger dose of the spike protein after the vaccine than the spike protein associated with the respiratory illness. Depending on the individual, some clearly cannot handle the shot’s spike protein exposure in conjunction with the lipid nanoparticles. So who dies? The vast majority of deaths due to the vaccines seem to be in the senior population. When an elderly person dies, however, it can be difficult to attribute any one event to their death besides “old-age.” This is not the case for a young person. Would it not be prudent to autopsy anyone under the age of fifty who dies within one month of an injection? How about the 21-year-old Greek soccer player that died on February 2nd, 2022 while playing in a match? If someone you love dies unexpectedly, we want to implore you to call the medical examiner and DEMAND a forensic autopsy.
Joseph Keating’s mother did just that in November of 2021 after her 26-year-old son died on November 11th, 2021. According to the autopsy report and certificate of death, Joseph died from severe heart damage from “myocarditis in the left ventricle due to the recent Pfizer COVID-19 booster vaccine.” According to Joseph’s vaccination cards, he received his first Pfizer shot on March 26, 2021, and the second dose on April 16, 2021. According to his mother, Joseph had not mentioned any negative adverse events after the first two doses and received a third booster dose on Nov. 8, 2021. Unfortunately, he received an especially bad batch. According to “How Bad is My Batch,” his booster batch number “FE3590” has the highest number of adverse events (530) and deaths (5) listed in the VAERS database for Pfizer lot numbers.
A recent report from Italy is heartbreaking to read as a neurosurgeon found 18-year-old Camilla Canepa suffering from major thrombosis throughout her vasculature in her brain. Camilla complained to her family members about severe headaches and died one week after receiving an AstraZeneca injection. The findings provide additional evidence regarding the effects of vaccinations on our blood. An additional report by a German chief pathologist found the COVID-19 injection was the cause of death in 30-40% of all autopsies in the recently vaccinated. He conducted 40 autopsies in early Fall 2021 of people who had died within two weeks of receiving a dose of the COVID-19 injection. He discovered that the vaccine seemed to have spurred the development of autoimmune diseases as a side effect and caused cerebral vein thrombosis in some of the deceased persons. Based on the results, he called for more frequent and more thorough autopsies of vaccinated individuals to determine if the COVID-19 shots played a role in their demise.
Another German pathologist presented his findings from fifteen histopathologic analyses performed on the organs of persons who died after vaccination. Dr. Arne Burkhardt found clear evidence of auto-immune attacks by killer lymphocytes invading the heart and lungs, followed by liver, thyroid gland, salivary glands, and brain. Four of the fifteen individuals were only vaccinated once and in 90% of the cases, Dr. Burkhardt found the same pathological findings. The following are the steps that appear to be associated with the progression of damage from the shots.
- The blood vessels become leaky.
- The mRNA leaks into the organs.
- The organs start to produce the spike proteins and then the killer lymphocytes attack these proteins.
- The mRNA gets to the lymph nodes and starts to produce the spike proteins and then these spikes proteins kill our lymphocytes.
Subsequently, our sentinel lymphocytes and the cells that have control over our immune system die, weakening our immune system. Dr. Arne Burkhardt provides an explanation of these autopsies at minute 21:30 in this symposium video. There are several other interesting talks within this recording as well that we encourage you to listen to. One that is directly tied to this chapter starts at 8:30 with Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi discussing the risk and safety of the injections and how they affect the body.
If the full-length spike protein is cytotoxic, doesn’t stay at the site of injection but travels to every major organ including the brain and no one can tell us if the mRNA ever stops forcing the body to produce spike protein, then is this injection safe? Compared to the risks of the actual disease (see Chapter 1), what is the real risk of accepting the injection?
Are we comfortable creating “vaccine passports” to enter restaurants, grocery stores, and concert venues knowing that the shots are not only NOT stopping infection and transmission but killing and permanently injuring hundreds of thousands of people? How long are we going to continue to ignore the large number of young people dying of “unknown causes” or athletes collapsing on the field of play? When are our government agencies going to provide official guidance to the medical community on how to diagnose and treat vaccine injuries? Or better yet, when will the majority of our medical conglomerates start ignoring the government agencies, and instead encourage doctors and colleagues to use their critical thinking skills and practice patient-centric medicine again, regardless of government payouts?
We know the following from the information provided in this chapter:
- Jonathan Moreno was accurate in his prediction that human experimentation would occur again in the future.
- Senator Ron Johnson’s COVID-19: A second opinion panel held on January 24, 2022, revealed alarming data about the vaccines that was provided under sworn testimony.
- The United States should immediately ban vaccinations for individuals 30 and under following Belgium,Germany, and France, Sweden and Denmark, Norway, Finland, Taiwan.
- Cardiac Adverse Events, including myocarditis research, provide enough evidence to ban vaccinations for all age groups as they negatively impact the heart and vasculature.
- Mixing shots from different brands (Pfizer, Moderna, etc.), is recklessly irresponsible.
- The effect of Covid-19 vaccinations on our blood is incredibly concerning (see Figure 3 for visual).
- The shots have been shown to cause abnormally high activity in lymph nodes as evidence shows in CT scans (see figure 4)
- We have data that clinically shows a 1000% increase in neurological issues affecting our military members who have been vaccinated (e.g., 82,000 vs 863,000 in one year).
- If the under-reporting factor (URF) as calculated using the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) for spontaneous abortions is 49, then there could be upwards of 154,203 – 172,823 fetal deaths from the VAERS database alone.
- Upon re-analysis of the Shimabukaro, et al (2021) data it was found that the “cumulative incidence of spontaneous abortion is 7 to 8 times higher than the original results” indicating that those who received the shots prior to 20 weeks had spontaneous abortion rates of 104/127 (81.8%).
- The autopsy reports that have been completed show conclusive damage caused by the mRNA shots.
We need to stop the mandates and passports permanently; stop wearing cloth masks around as if they have any impact on the virus spreading, stop the totalitarian tyrannical behavior, and stop vaccinating individuals until we have safety data that justifies the efficacy of the Covid-19 shots. We need to protect physicians and individuals who have the courage to speak out and treat individuals with safe and effective therapeutics. We need to stop allowing the influence of a few to negatively impact the majority. In the next chapter, we will delve deeper into the vaccinations and their efficacy since the rollout in December of 2020.
Questions to Consider
- What is the psychology behind humans continuing to conduct malevolent experiments on fellow humans?
- Why wasn’t Senator Ron Johnson’s panel broadcasted by all major media networks?
- Why are researchers who attempt to discuss adverse events reported to the pharmacovigilance systems and publish their results having their papers retracted after peer-review and publication or outright rejected?
- Why have we not had more serious discussions about what is being found in select vaccine vials and what is being seen in the blood of a vaccinated person?
- What is your personal risk profile in accepting an mRNA inoculation?
- What is your personal risk when, not if, you become naturally infected with COVID-19 with and without appropriate early treatment?
- Why are autopsies of those dying within two weeks of vaccination not more prevalent?
“I am giving a very clear message to the nation and SCOTUS based on my analysis and clinical practice. They [Covid-19 injections] have no public health or bioethical standing and are damaging persons, populations and societies.” – Dr. Peter McCollough Association of Physicians and Surgeons, January 11, 2022