by Dr. Amy Cerato and Dr. Eric Snyder
On July 21, 2021 Joe Biden said the following at a CNN Town Hall event: “if you are vaccinated, you are not going to be hospitalized, not going to be in the ICU unit, and you are not going to die.” Could this statement be any more fallacious?
In 2014, William Cronnon sat down at a Cracker Barrel restaurant to enjoy a meal. Mr. Cronnon was brought an “ice water” but was not informed that the ice water was actually Eco San (a clear, corrosive cleaning solution). Fast forward to January of 2022, and Mr. Cronnon was awarded 9.4 million U.S. dollars by a Tennessee Federal Court. Here are a few questions to consider knowing the adverse health effects of ingesting a corrosive cleaning solution.
- If trained individuals from Cracker Barrel knew the “dangerous-when-ingested” Eco San was being given to Mr. Cronnon, would they still have delivered the fluids? If so, would there be criminal charges?
- If Mr. Cronnon knew that the “dangerous-when-ingested” Eco San was the fluid, would he have taken a swig?
- Would government officials waive legal liability for Cracker Barrel if their employees knowingly serve the “dangerous-when-ingested” Eco San to customers in the future?
Ok, now replace Cracker Barrel with “the pharmaceutical companies” who make mRNA gene therapies, Eco San with the “mRNA gene therapies (vaccine),” and Mr. Cronnon with “an individual.” If a jury is willing to award $9.4 million to an individual when the company employee “accidentally” delivered Eco San, what would damages amount to if the company knowingly delivered a harmful product?
But what is in these mRNA gene therapy products? What is in it! What are the ingredients? Hello? Can anyone hear us? It is as if we live in an echo chamber where we continue to ask the same question of the “experts” without receiving an answer. How is this possible two years into this worldwide event? We live in the USA. We live in a country that has single university endowments that dwarfs the financial wealth of entire nations (Harvard – 53.6 billion in 2021). In Oklahoma alone, we have two major universities whose fiscal reach and lab capabilities would easily permit the analysis of a few vials each of Pfizer/BioNTech, Moderna, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson (Janssen), “vaccines.” Why wouldn’t our best and brightest in the ivory towers be curious to know all of the ingredients within the mRNA gene therapies (aka vaccine)?
Below is a basic rule of life for those who weren’t aware:
Prior to ingesting or injecting fluids into the human body, one should strive to know all ingredients of the fluid.
This is why we have ingredient lists on the products that we consume. Following this logic, we presume that William Cronnon would have wanted to know the ingredients in his “ice water” that was served at Cracker Barrel as the consequences have resulted in permanent changes to his body.
What has been one of the most perplexing questions of this entire world event is the following:
How can our doctors, virologists, biologists, or physicians recommend the mRNA gene therapy shots when not one of these individuals can inform the public of ALL ingredients?
First Vaccines, Conflicting Data, and Vaccine Safety
On December 14th, 2020 some of the first Covid-19 vaccinations were administered to healthcare workers and the elderly in New York. At the time, little was known about the efficacy and safety of the vaccines as they were limited to small clinical trials and expedited scientific inquiry. Over the past year, we have closely followed the research and data about vaccine safety and the largest experimental vaccination campaign in human history. While the initial push touted the success of the medical and pharmaceutical establishment, the narrative is now in peril as subacute and long-term injuries continue to surface.
Our leaders and media are now saying that cases are a bad metric, hospitalizations are mostly incidental, deaths are focused in the highly comorbid, and that we need targeted protection among the most vulnerable. Apparently, our government representatives and media followed our work on Ignite Liberty closely. Even notions of natural immunity are suddenly being tracked and modeled by the very same people who were recently denying it and telling you that only vaccines could generate herd immunity. How much more abhorrent can this really become?
The massive unprecedented public failure of our Covid-19 public health policies are too big to hide. Even the Editor of the British Medical Journal (BMJ), a major international medical journal, lamented that underlying data for covid-19 therapeutics and vaccine trials were hard to find. The editor publicly demanded, in large print even, that “data should be fully and immediately available for public scrutiny.” He then elaborated:
As the global vaccine rollout continues, it cannot be justifiable or in the best interest of patients and the public that we are left to just trust “in the system,” with the distant hope that the underlying data may become available for independent scrutiny at some point in the future. Data must be available when trial results are announced, published or used to justify regulatory decisions. Pharmaceutical companies are reaping vast profits without adequate independent scrutiny of their scientific claims. The purpose of regulators is not to dance to the tune of rich global corporations and enrich them further; it is to protect the health of their populations. We need complete data transparency for all studies, we need it in the public interest and we need it now.”
Amen Dr. Doshi! But where were you and your journal articles last year when the vaccinations rolled out to the public under emergency use? It would have been nice to have a few more advocates fighting for freedom and public health especially given the risks dissenters have taken in the relentless pursuit of truth. But credit should be given when credit is due. The UK government has provided exceptionally transparent (and very unfavorable to the narrative) data throughout this world event. Even with such great data showing negative trends, it makes one wonder why it took so long to become the first western nation to completely abandon all Covid restrictions.
Is it not interesting that officials decided to make this change now? On January 20, 2022, Boris Johnson announced all Covid restrictions would end immediately. Is this because the data is becoming more clear every day? Figure 1 below shows case rates and death rates by vaccination status in the UK. Individuals who have taken two shots, have higher case numbers as well as death numbers (and rate) than the unvaccinated, infection naive, in the 70+ cohort and roughly match the unvaccinated in the 50-59 group.
In its weekly reports, the United Kingdom revealed as many as 80 percent of its Covid deaths are in vaccinated individuals (See slide 37). In the last several days, New South Wales, the most populous state in Australia, has reported over 70 percent of its surging Covid deaths in the vaccinated. Scotland’s data shows a similar trend and should be considered as we make future public policy.
In Denmark, where 95% of adults are vaccinated and 65% boosted, there are more COVID-19 hospitalizations now than before a single Dane received a single mRNA vaccine, and the vast majority of those hospitalizations are among the vaccinated population. Even the boosters have been proven to be ineffective. In Figure 3, the dark blue line is about to pass the peak of the light blue line from last year (Dark Blue = fully vaccinated, Light blue = unvaccinated). If this is vaccine success, we’d hate to see vaccine failure.
In contrast to these countries that show the majority of the cases, hospitalizations, and deaths occur in fully vaccinated, the governor of New Jersey said on January 20, 2022, that his state had only four deaths of vaccinated people in the last month, out of a total of 600 Covid deaths. These numbers are only possible if human biology is radically different in New Jersey than everywhere else in the world. Remember when Bernie Sanders said, “Guns in Vermont are different than guns in Chicago?”
But what about data in Oklahoma? Please see our current health department dataset here. We’ve also included a link to the letter that was sent to Oklahomans on January 18th, 2022 from our major hospital systems regarding the lack of beds available for the wave of COVID positive patients? This additional link is the OKC hospital report regarding patients and ICU units available. The letter above states that the hospitals had “Zero ICU beds and no inpatient beds available.” The current OKC hospital report also shows zero ICU beds with 897 Covid-19 patients as of January 24th, 2022. But is this accurate?
Interestingly, the U.S Department of Health and Human Services data that is sourced by the John Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center database does not reflect such a dire situation in Oklahoma. In fact, during the week of January 17th, there were 95 ICU beds available in Oklahoma according to the dataset collected by Johns Hopkins. On January 24th, 2022 there are 100 available ICU beds. If you look at the number of staffed ICU beds for the past 18 months, Oklahoma has apparently never had more than 90% of the available ICU beds occupied. If you look at the inpatient capacity, Oklahoma has never shown more than 75% of the available inpatient beds occupied. So who are we supposed to believe? It is also interesting that in January of 2020, Oklahoma had 1130 ICU beds available but in the middle of the Omicron surge the entire state only has 882 ICU beds (difference of 248)? If the U.S. The Department of Health and Human services in conjunction with the Oklahoma Department of Health and John Hopkins are reporting that Oklahoma is currently at 72% inpatient capacity and 90% ICU capacity it would be nice to know how how many ICU beds the four largest hospitals had in January of 2020? Why would we have less beds given the continuation of Covid and dire conditions in the hospitals? Can hospitals adjust their ICU bed capacity daily? Is this a staffing issue due to the mandating of an experimental vaccine that is in violation of 21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3 which clearly states that medical products under Emergency Use Authorization cannot be mandated? Clearly, there is an issue in data collection and reporting at some level that needs to be rectified.
In the fall of 2021, we met with Oklahoma Health Department individuals to try to learn about their selection of variables and attributes in their datasets and how they are subsequently reported to the public. The meeting ended a bit earlier than expected and in true Oklahoma fashion, we say “bless their hearts” as they continue to attempt to report whatever it is they are reporting.
Speaking of the differences between public health data collection and transparent reporting, can anyone provide a reasonable rationale why the United States’ CDC stopped recording breakthrough cases in the vaccinated on May 1, 2021? Could it be so they could continue to tell us we have a pandemic of the unvaccinated? Clearly, the United States’ case rate trends cannot be completely opposite of what the UK, Australia, Scotland, Denmark, Israel, and others are reporting.
Apparently, not all states are obfuscating their data or using definitional manipulation to recategorize hospitalizations and deaths. In a surprise move for a US state, and contrary to the complete fiasco of a CDC, Massachusetts provides raw numbers for infections in vaccinated people, instead of hiding them and offering only “adjusted rate ratios” that claim to compare infection risks in the vaccinated and unvaccinated. Massachusetts reported 86,450 infections, 884 hospitalizations, and 170 deaths in vaccinated people for the week ending Jan. 15; almost half of all Covid deaths over that period (Jan 9-15 Deaths = 346). Even more importantly, Massachusetts also acknowledged that those figures underestimate the real totals in the vaccinated because its reporting systems miscounted some of the participants as unvaccinated. This is because people who are infected after their first dose, or less than 14 days after the second, are counted as “unvaccinated.” Other countries generally report individuals in this classification as “partially vaccinated.”
As the report explains:
The number of cases in vaccinated people may be undercounted due to discrepancies in the names and dates of birth of individuals, resulting in an inability to match records across systems. Hospitalization data is likely also undercounted as identification and reporting of hospitalized cases relies on that information being obtainable by case investigators through patient interview.”
Massachusetts’s admission helps explain why the United States reports relatively fewer deaths and hospitalizations in Covid-vaccinated people than other highly vaccinated countries with more complete immunization registries and national health care systems. It doesn’t, however, come close to explaining why New Jersey’s data are the polar opposite of what we are seeing in other states.
But hallelujah! Massachusetts actually delineates their hospitalizations between incidental (testing positive while in the hospital) and primary (receiving dexamethasone treatment). You can see that the split between primary and incidental hovers around 50% for a one-week reporting window. The reports would be even better if they provided the primary data on hospitalization based on vaccination as the data point could help inform public health policies. Can the Massachusetts Health Department visit our great state and teach the Oklahoma Health Department how to do this please? We are sure they have a few ivy-league firms that can provide a seminar on data analysis for a minute fee from the taxpayer coffers. We offered our services free of charge to help save lives, but help was never requested.
While UK government officials announce the end of all mandates, we in the United States are still hearing the incessant messaging of Dr. Fauci and Bill Gates with quotes like these below:
(1). “these vaccines are among the safest, most effective vaccines ever created (Fauci),”
(2). “Everyone that gets the vaccine is not just protecting themselves but reducing their transmission to other people and allowing society to get back to normal (Gates).”
Yet, our government officials have conceded that the vaccines do NOT prevent transmission and infection, noting that “the vaccines can’t prevent transmission, but continue to work well with regard to severe illness and death (Walensky).” Walensky must be looking at Israel, which is a classic case study on how vaccines do not prevent transmission. Israel released the 4th booster and subsequently reported 69,104 new Covid cases on January 20, 2022.
We wonder if Fauci, Gates, and Walensky even bothered to review any of the 146 studies that were published by researchers around the globe showing that natural immunity is superior. Couple this with the CDC’s publication on January 19th, 2022 proving that natural immunity was SIX times stronger than vaccinations and we believe the debate is over in regards to vaccination vs natural immunity. Tell us something we didn’t know! Yet those raining down mandates and restrictions on individuals are still pushing vaccinations on the naturally immune and have remained completely silent for over a year as more than one million adverse events were reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). How many government representatives in Oklahoma spoke up and advocated for early treatment and support of those who have been vaccine-injured? How many spoke up about the legitimacy of natural immunity? Only a few, and those individuals deserve praise and reelection.
If you can’t tell, the backpedaling of the narrative in the mainstream media is picking up speed. This is why it was important for us to document and write these chapters as humans have a tendency to erase the past. But hasn’t immeasurable damage already been done? There are families that have lost loved ones to Covid-19 and there are also families that are suffering the debilitating effects of a dangerous EUA experimental vaccine with poor trial data and no long-term safety studies. Both need a voice and reconciliation.
For example, do you know what the ingredient list is in any of the vaccine products? If you don’t know what the ingredients are in a product, how would you know how it might react in your body given the variance of individual medical histories? Does it react differently across age groups, genders, medical history, or prior infection? Does dosing matter? What were the results of the testing in animals? What were the results in the human trials and were the trials properly performed?
How did the Covid-19 narrative coerce 75% of our nation to accept experimental therapeutic products without demanding true informed consent? If informed consent is the process in which a health care provider educates a patient about the risks, benefits and alternatives of a given procedure or intervention then we would argue that the public health policies surrounding this entire event lacked informed consent.
People have the right to be given informed consent of risks and benefits of a medical procedure. Informed consent is not given if the risks are hidden. Where there is risk, there must be choice.” – Dr. Robert Malone, January 13, 2022 Substack Post “How Bad is my Batch – The Story of my Vaccine Injury”
Why would a person choose to accept an unproven medical intervention with an unknown safety profile for such a low-risk disease? Why would our medical professionals recommend a “treatment” without knowing all of the ingredients or adverse effects? Why, when reports of adverse events started cropping up early in the vaccination campaign were those adverse events ignored? We have to reconcile vaccine safety because it is obvious that in most age groups, this “one-size-fits-all” solution shows that the risks far outweigh the benefits by a large margin.
It is appalling that by January 22, 2021, there were already 182 reported deaths after the Covid-19 vaccination. To provide perspective on how serious of an issue these reports were consider the following:
For all vaccines combined in a twenty-year period (roughly 278 million vaccinations given each year in the US), the average number of deaths that were reported into the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) central database per year was about 150 (e.g. 150 deaths/278 million vaccinations).
Suddenly, in only one month after rolling out the Covid-19 inoculations, there were 182 deaths in 27 million vaccinations (7 deaths/million); well above acceptable limits. Clearly, the CDC and FDA and pharmaceutical companies did not conduct an adequate safety review. We know this is true because the CDC and FDA failed to form an external critical event committee, a data safety monitoring committee, or a human ethics board assigned to evaluate the vaccine products. To this day, they still do not have any of these programs and the connections between government agencies, our media, and pharmaceutical leadership are very concerning. See the image below. The career pathways of these individuals are eerily similar to the Security Exchange Commission’s (SEC’s) and the Commodities Futures Trade Commissions (CFTC) connections with Wall Street Banks and the Fed.
Is it not apparent that we the people had the wrong agencies and people leading us? The FDA is a drug watch government organization and the CDC is supposed to be in charge of outbreak evaluation programs; neither were equipped to, or supposed to lead clinical programs. Not only were the wrong agencies leading the vaccination trials and rollout, but there were also no independent safety committees to review the data and halt the programs in February 2021. This is wholly odious, especially as the agencies recommended the shot for children and pregnant women, two vulnerable populations.
But what would happen in a normal scenario when a new treatment product is being evaluated? Believe it or not, there are procedures. After introducing a new product, we know that when 5 unexplained deaths are reached, a Blackbox warning of “may cause death,” is issued. If 50 deaths are reached with the product, it would be immediately taken off the market and reviewed for safety (see here). How on earth did we get to 182 reported deaths in 27 million shots and not stop the experimental inoculations? By March 2021, there were 1,200 deaths reported in 60 million vaccinations. Today there are 22,193 deaths with 39,150 permanently disabled reported to VAERS in 242 million vaccinations (92 deaths/1 million), and there are two separate analyses that show that 50% of these deaths occur within 48 hours and 80% occur within a week.
Why is there no stopping condition?
The truth is, when large government entities (CDC, FDA, NIH) work in conjunction with other monopolies (media), the subtle manipulation of information becomes extremely powerful. This is why linguistic changes of words by entities without the consent of the public are problematic. Did this happen over the past two years? Yes! Is the vaccine worse than the disease in much of the population? Yes! Is what these entities call a vaccine really a vaccine? No!
The Evolving Definition of Vaccines
Prior to the worldwide campaign to mass vaccinate, five criteria were established within the literature to classify an injection as a “vaccine.” Below, we will list those five criteria, and then provide details as to why the threshold for acceptance has or has not been met.
(1) The injection must give you antibody immunity to a virus or bacterium.
We know conclusively that the injection does not result in antibody immunity to the virus. It may give you antibody immunity to the spike protein, but the spike protein is not specific to the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Why did the FDA announce that antibody testing is not effective in determining immunity among the vaccinated? Were they telling us that they KNEW the vaccine doesn’t provide antibody immunity to the SARS-CoV-2 virus? If not, what does the testing provide?
In several published scientific articles, researchers found that the injection produces serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies against the S1 spike protein. Read that again. Injected people produce antibodies against the S1 spike protein, NOT antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 VIRUS (Covid-19)! This paper, published on August 16, 2021, states that “nearly 100% of hospital workers in this study mounted a strong antibody response to the spike protein after dose 2 of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine, independent of vaccine-induced reactions.” Individuals must read the scientific papers carefully and pay attention to the words they use. The FDA admitted to the public that the vaccine doesn’t protect against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. It only produces antibodies against an S1 Spike Protein, which is not unique to the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
(2) That antibody must give you protection from the virus or bacterium
The antibody immunity is supposed to give you protection against the virus. Not only has that not been shown, but authorities have stated (interview at minute 59) that they don’t know if the injection will give you protection from a SARS-CoV-2 infection. A more recent study shows that the booster showed zero efficacy in protecting from Omicron. The number of breakthrough infections (i.e., vaccine failure) across the globe and the number of boosters now being offered should be a clear indication that there is limited protection provided against SARS-CoV-2 from the injection. The UK data provided earlier in the chapter also shows in some cases the vaccinated population dying at higher rates than unvaccinated.
This is even more disheartening given the paperwork provided to individuals prior to receiving the inoculation. Figure 9 is a Pfizer-BioNTech sheet provided to an individual who was inoculated in Oklahoma during the Spring of 2021. How many individuals actually read this sheet where they admitted the duration of protection was unknown?
(3) The injection must show that it reduces hospitalizations, deaths, or severe symptoms of that virus or bacterium.
It is clear that the shots were not adequately studied to see if they reduced hospitalizations, deaths, or severe symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection. There was not enough time in the clinical trials to appropriately assess these variables; and we know that after ninety days, when the injections started failing, Pfizer compromised their control group (please see this video for evidence). Pfizer also openly admitted that the vaccines offered “limited” to “no protection” against Omicron (see recent statements by the CEO). The evidence is becoming more clear as the majority of cases, hospitalizations, and deaths in highly vaccinated countries are fully vaccinated individuals. Given the large number of breakthrough cases, it is clear the efficacy of these shots is poor. To add additional fuel to the fire, on November 2nd, 2021 additional evidence regarding the clinical trials surfaced with a whistleblower reporting that Pfizer’s research organization falsified data in their phase III Covid-19 vaccine trial. The whistleblower provided evidence in the British Medical Journal that the company falsified data, unblinded patients, and employed inadequately trained vaccinators. They were also slow to follow up on adverse events that were reported in the critical phase III trial.
(4) The injection must show that it stops a person from carrying that virus or bacterium.
There were no studies performed prior to the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) that investigated if the injection stops a person from carrying the SARS-CoV-2 virus. We now know the injection does not prevent individuals from carrying the virus. The CDC confirmed that fully vaccinated individuals who contract the infection have as high a viral load in their nasal passages as unvaccinated individuals who get infected. This provides evidence that there is no difference between the two, in terms of being infected, carrying, or being a transmission risk.
(5) The injection must show that it stops the transmission of the virus or bacteria from one person to another
Clearly, the shots do not prevent transmission of the virus, but what is more problematic was that there was no research being done prior to releasing the product to the public. Launching the vaccinations into the human population during the EUA was the study, and once we hit the six-month mark, the failures of the injections became glaringly obvious.
Do you hear the alarms going off! Not ONE of the five criteria above has been met to justify calling this experimental mRNA gene therapy a vaccine. The shot is not a vaccine. It is becoming more clear every day that it was never meant to provide antibody immunity, protection, prevention, a reduction in hospitalizations, deaths, or severe symptoms. At best, one could classify this mRNA injection as a therapeutic; albeit a consummately ineffective and wildly dangerous one.
So, to be clear, prior to the worldwide mass inoculation campaign, we did not have any information to understand whether this injection provided antibody immunity to the virus. We had no information to prove it would protect against viral infection, protect against severe symptoms, being hospitalized, or dying. We had no information to prove that it would stop a person from carrying the virus or stop the transmission from one person to the next. And we now know that the information we were given was likely false per whistleblower documents.
Is this why the CDC decided to change the definition of “vaccines” in recent years?
Instead of requiring the medical profession to prove a product is an actual vaccine by definition, the CDC changed the definition of “vaccine” incrementally to accommodate what the injection supposedly does. We know the current mRNA gene therapies provide little to no “protection” to the virus. We know that it does not “PREVENT” the disease, or “PRODUCE IMMUNITY” to the disease. This is additional conclusive evidence that the product we are injecting into individuals is not, by definition, a vaccine.
Add to the equation the shoddy, shady, and mismanaged clinical trials, coupled with the authorization of the EUA and subsequent approval of multiple mRNA gene therapies (Pfizer’s, Moderna, J & J products) and one has to wonder why the mainstream media (MSM) keeps parroting to the public that this “vaccine” is safe and effective?
The safety and efficacy trials were unsatisfactory, to say the least. The Canadian COVID Care Alliance has an amazing video and powerpoint presentation that details the Pfizer vaccination trial flaws in both design and execution. They also discuss the initial two months in the Pfizer trial data that was released in September 2021 and published in a NEJM paper in November 2021 (with supplemental information). The NEJM article shows that the inoculations cause more illness than they prevent. The data show that there is no benefit to a reduction in cases if it comes at the cost of increased sickness and death. Are you now seeing how Big Pharma misled the public on not only the efficacy of the inoculations but, more importantly, on the safety? Why are the FDA, CDC, NIH, NIAID and others still complicit in this cover-up? Why has this vaccination program not been stopped?
What is safe about the Covid injections, specifically those containing mRNA? Have they proved, with any study, that these vaccines are actually safe and effective?
Dr. Eric Rubin, FDA advisory panel member, Harvard professor, and Editor-in-chief of the New England Journal of Medicinestated during the October 26, 2021, FDA’s Vaccines and Regulated Biological Products Advisory Committee meeting to recommend EUA of Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine in children ages 5-11, that…
We’re never going to learn about how safe this vaccine is unless we start giving it. That’s just the way it goes. That’s how we found out about rare complications of other vaccines like the rotavirus vaccine. And I do think we should vote to approve it.”
How reassuring! A statement like that is so heinous that all of us should call for resignation. Imagine if your 5-11 year-old suffered a severe injury from the shot.
Consider the following:
- mRNA technology has never been used successfully as a vaccine to prevent infectious disease or to demonstrate its ability to reduce the incidence of infectious disease in humans, ever. So whether or not this material is safe and effective is completely unknown. We have no history of use!
- No studies have ever been done to demonstrate what happens to the genetic material that makes up this mRNA that is meant to activate the body’s immune system to produce the spike protein. This means we do not know what happens to the mRNA after it is injected into the body. We hear experts state that the mRNA doesn’t last or doesn’t continue to force the body to produce spike proteins, but if you ask them where the study has been done to demonstrate that this mRNA from this vaccine does what they say it does, you will not find any. Any statement that this mRNA turns off and will not continue to force the body to produce spike proteins is false.
- The spike protein of Covid 19 has been shown to be the very piece of material that causes the symptoms of Covid 19; brain damage, neurological issues, heart attacks, lung disease, liver damage, spleen damage, kidney damage, male and female reproductive system damage, and it can cross the blood-brain barrier. So why would individuals allow an injection to be put into their body that asks the body to make spike proteins? Why would individuals consent when the scientists and experts cannot tell you if the body ever stops producing spike proteins?
- We do not know all the ingredients that are in the injection. Therefore, we do not have an accurate safety profile of what happens to any of these ingredients once they are injected into the body.
- There are lipid nanoparticles that are in the injections. A simple search on pub med to investigate how lipid nanoparticles react when injected into the body shows very clearly that much like the spike proteins, injuries occurred to brain, lung, heart, blood, liver, kidney, male, and female reproductive damage. There was also evidence to suggest they increased cancer rates.
How many Americans even know what lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are and what they are used for? Figure 11 provides a visual. Over the past year, LNPs have received praise from scientists for being the catalyst for change in vaccine technology, but are they really the unsung heroes? In order to simplify the science behind the use of lipid nanoparticles, we encourage you to read this article in Chemical and Engineering News. It should be noted that this article is from March 6, 2021, if written 10 months later, the tone of the article may be very different.
The first FDA approved use of lipid nanoparticles as carriers of RNA to treat disease was in 2018. Since approval, research into the use of lipid nanoparticles has continued to grow as drug manufacturers found value in the use of LNP’s to deliver drugs to various organs and the brain (through the blood-brain barrier). A study by Chen and Konofagou measured the size of the blood brain barrier (BBB) and found a nanoparticle size smaller than 54nm can cross the BBB. With lipid nanoparticles as the vessel, RNA technology can be assured to be delivered to the desired location. But how do you prevent the LNP’s from moving to undesirable locations? Do the lipid nanoparticles in the mRNA gene therapies (vaccines), which are carriers for the spike proteins, penetrate the BBB and other organs? How would this impact the individual if the technology spreads throughout their entire body? While we have little evidence on the impact in humans, we do know that research into lipid nanoparticles and their impact on mice is concerning.
In a 2017 study in vaccinated mice against influenza viruses with liquid nanoparticle (LNP)- encapsulated mRNA vaccines, they found traces of the mRNA in the brain, and all examined tissues except the kidney. The tested tissue included the heart, lung, testis, brain tissues, indicating that the mRNA/LNP platform crossed the blood brain barrier. In a March 2021 article, researchers found that the S1 spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 crosses the blood-brain barrier in mice. An additional study by Ndeupen in March of 2021, confirmed that the:
NP’s (Nanoparticles) can be distributed and can accumulate in different organs such as the liver, spleen, lungs, kidneys, and brain.” and “The toxicity of NPs is dependent on their biophysical properties including size, surface area, surface change, and aggregation state.”
The Ndeupen (2021) article is important because the researchers injected the LNP’s through the mice’s skin and the results were rapid and robust inflammatory responses. When they delivered the LNP’s nasally, they had a similar inflammatory response in the lungs and a high mortality rate. While aluminum, titanium, and other metals have been used as vessels to deliver the RNA technologies, graphene oxide was selected as a catalyst for the Covid-19 vaccines.
Given that we know the LNP’s do cross into the brain and other organs, we can then confirm that the metallic particles also remain in the brain and other organs. In the medical field, the term biopersist is utilized to define this outcome. How many individuals who have taken the shot would like to have LNP’s biopersisting in their bodies? If a spike protein is attached to the LNP as a vessel, how many would want these spike proteins to travel and remain in their brain or heart knowing that such an outcome results in an inflammatory response? The LNP’s are known to cause DNA damage, modification to protein structures and functions, and disruption of membrane integrity.
So let’s review what we know to be true:
- We do not have confirmation of an accurate ingredient list for the mRNA gene therapies from any scientist, researchers, corporation, or world government as of January 24th, 2022.
- In December of 2020, the EUA approved mRNA gene therapies were made available to the public. Remember, the overall death rate for 2020 did not change even though the mRNA gene therapies weren’t available to the public until December 2020! See Chapter 2!
- The narrative recently evolved to concede that cases are a bad metric, hospitalizations are mostly incidental, deaths are focused in the highly comorbid, and public policy should target protection for the most vulnerable.
- The UK, Danish, Scottish data shows a collapsing narrative when comparing the case rates, hospitalizations, and deaths of the vaccinated versus the unvaccinated. The January 20th, 2022 announcement by Boris Johnson to end all Covid-19 restrictions supports this notion.
- Massachusetts data collection and reporting on Covid-19 is superior to Oklahoma’s.
- The CDC’s publication on January 19th, 2022 proved that natural immunity was SIX times stronger than vaccinations. As we documented in our previous chapter the debate is over in regards to vaccination vs natural immunity. Natural immunity wins!
- Informed consent is the process in which a health care provider educates a patient about the risks, benefits, and alternatives of a given procedure or intervention. Appropriate informed consent was not given to those who took the shot.
- The shots should have been halted prior to January 22, 2021, when we knew there were already 182 reported deaths.
- The FDA, CDC, and NIH personnel shown in Figure 8 have peculiar career pathways.
- The mRNA gene therapy does not meet any of the five standards associated with the definition of a vaccine. Therefore, it is not a vaccine.
- The definition of a vaccine has evolved over the past decade to allow for narrative changes.
- Pfizer lied about clinical trial outcomes for both safety and efficacy and the information was hidden from the public.
- Lipid Nanoparticles
- Cause inflammatory reactions and even mortality when injected into mice.
- Spreads throughout the body, including into the brain and other organs.
- Were approved for use by the FDA in 2018 with little safety data.
- Spike proteins are cytotoxic.
While the facts above are important, the next portion of this chapter will delve deeper into the adverse events reporting and subsequent research that has surfaced regarding the mRNA gene therapies and their effect on the human body. While we are not fans of trigger warnings, we want to inform readers that Chapter 11 on vaccine safety was the most difficult to write simply because of how many individuals we know who were injured by these shots. As each week passes, and the data evolves, we are reminded of William Cronnon’s $9.4 million compensation for ingesting Eco San and wonder; what justice will be given to those injured by the experimental mRNA gene therapy who have no avenue for legal recourse against the liability immune pharmaceutical companies who knowingly released an unsafe and ineffective product?
Questions to Consider
- Where are the FDA/CDC safety reports based on the reported adverse events?
- Where are the original data on the vaccine trials and why haven’t they undergone independent reviews to check safety and efficacy claims?
- Why are the large number of adverse events reported to the pharmacovigilance systems worldwide being ignored?
- What is the stopping condition for these vaccines and what agency will stop them due to safety concerns?
“The obedient always think of themselves as virtuous rather than cowardly” – Robert Anton Wilson