Chapter 12: Undue Risk, Specific Adverse Events, and Autopsy’s after Covid-19 Inoculations

by Dr. Amy Cerato and Dr. Eric Snyder

In 1994, President Bill Clinton commissioned a special committee to investigate allegations of government-sponsored radiation research on unknowing citizens during the Cold War. The President’s Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments studied newly declassified top-secret documents that showed human experimentation played an extensive role in the United States’ attempts to build and protect against weapons of mass destruction. The committee was charged not only with resolving questions of medical ethics but also with determining who was harmed and what appropriate compensation for those seeking justice would equate to. The 1000-page final report was released at a White House ceremony in October of 1995. This culminating report was extensive but was not exhaustive and thankfully, further investigation from one of the committee members, Dr. Jonathan Moreno, continued.

While he was attempting to discover the truth about radiation experiments on the American people during his 18-month Presidential Committee assignment, Dr. Moreno unearthed scores of references to malevolent biological and chemical weapons research on humans. Had the original committee’s charge been extended to the history and ethics of biological and chemical experiments, the final report would have likely exceeded 5,000 pages. This is because studies and documentation of chemical and biological agents in the military context have a more robust history than radiation research. The military studies did not always involve the development or use of weapons against an enemy, but instead, efforts were garnered to improve the performance of soldiers in battle. For example:

• Bavarian soldiers were given cocaine without their knowledge to see if the drug would help them overcome fatigue (1883)
• British Soldiers were provided the Typhoid vaccine when fighting in the South African Boer War (~1900)
• Soldiers were used to test the efficacy of gas masks and other protective breathing devices by exposing them to test clouds of bacteriological agents at Fort Detrick (the 1940’s)
• Soldiers were used to test mustard gas chambers in the Naval Research Laboratory (WWII)
• Soldiers were provided Lysergic Acid diethylamide (LSD), a psychoactive agent, to study mind-control (the 1950s)
• Soldiers were exposed to nerve gas agents when fighting in the 1991 Gulf War

Dr. Moreno’s pursuit of truth culminated in his seminal book titled, Undue Risk: Secret State Experiments on Humans. The book was published in 2000 and while the nature of the topic can be disturbing, the narrative poses serious questions about the role of government in the ethics of human experimentation. Dr. Moreno accurately points out that the military-medical experiments performed on civilians were just as unethical, gruesome, and egregious as what he found specific to military soldiers. Consider the following civilian experiments:

• The injected plutonium experiments conducted on working-class hospitalized patients without their knowledge or consent in the 1940s
• The Tuskegee study of untreated syphilis in over 400 poor, black sharecroppers from 1932-1972
• MKUltra, the illegal human experimentation program designed and undertaken by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to develop behavioral modification procedures using “truth” drugs like LSD and mescaline to aid in interrogations.

Our government agencies have a history of employing a lack of bioethics and morality when it comes to human experimentation. As one further explores Undue Risk, it becomes clear that deception, omission, and coercion were the preferred methods of operation over true informed consent and free choice. Dr. Moreno ended his book with this prediction…

If there is a single lesson to be learned from the story of military-medical human experiments, it is that we can expect them to continue in the future.” page 294

Is it not infuriating when the future proves the past? It is as if we aren’t able to learn from our mistakes and instead amplify the stakes. What Dr. Moreno predicted is here today as we remain in the midst of the largest medical experimentation program ever conducted on humans; an experimentation program whose impact will be felt for generations. This is why it is critical to document the events that have taken place since the start of Covid-19 so our history books provide a voice for the victims and hold accountable those in leadership positions.

To comprehend the scope and scale of the experimental mRNA gene therapies, consider the indisputable evidence garnered from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) contained within the Defense Medical Surveillance System (DMSS) that was recently added to the permanent congressional record during Senator Ron Johnson’s COVID-19: A second opinion panel held on January 24, 2022. Several brave military doctors and health care providers came forward to sound the alarm about the dramatic increases observed in certain diagnosis codes (health codes are assigned to patients to keep accurate records) in the first ten months of 2021. These reports were well above the prior 5-year average.  Their sworn declaration provided the following evidence:

— a 300% increase in miscarriages (4,182 vs 1,499)

— a 300% increase in cancer diagnoses (114,645 vs 38,700)

— a 269% increase in myocardial infarction

— a 291% increase in Bell’s palsy

— a 467% increase in pulmonary embolisms

— a 471% increase in female infertility

— a 1,000% increase in neurological diagnoses (863,000 vs 82,000)

Thomas Renz, an individual we believe will eventually be recognized as an American hero, served as the lawyer representing the military health professionals. During the panel, Renz accurately pointed out that the 2020 diagnosis codes (the first year of Covid-19) for the same conditions listed above, do NOT show similar increases. This allows us to marginalize Covid-19 as a possible cause. Renz told a reporter for Blaze News that this was just “the tip of the iceberg,” as numerous other diagnosis categories have also increased exponentially. Renz presented a sworn declaration from one military doctor who came forward, which states,

It is my professional opinion that the major increases of the above-discussed instances of miscarriages, cancers, and disease were due to COVID-19 ‘vaccinations.’”

At this point, it doesn’t take Sherlock Holmes to figure out that the military doctor’s sworn declaration is accurate! Upon conducting a simple review of the adverse events reported in 2021 to the DMED, the United States’ Vaccine Adverse Event Reports (VAERS) system, Europe’s Eudravigilance, the British Yellowcard (UK), the Swiss Adverse, and WHO sponsored VigiaAccess, along with entities like Center for Medicare Services (CMS), it should be clear that serious adverse events (SAE) post-Covid-19-vaccination are not rare and continue to be reported at alarming rates. While not attempting to be humorous, this is our time to sound like a large law firm’s late-night advertisement for a class action suit against a recently approved FDA drug in the United States.

If you know of someone who has been injured or killed by these mRNA gene therapies please send their families to this website, “No More Silence,” which allows individuals and the families of individuals who have been injured or killed as a result of the C19 injection to tell their stories. We also encourage you to contact attorney Thomas Renz.

We hope to inspire people to visit this website as these individuals have no recourse with the pharmaceutical companies and their doctors often gaslight them without solutions for recovery. Perhaps the gaslighting occurs from medical professionals because the scope and scale of the devastation transcend the entirety of the medical field as the shots impact individuals differently based on dosage, ingredients, prior medical history, and other factors. These inherently evil shots seem to be decentralized in their ability to impact various systems and parts of the human body. In doing so, cardiologists, hematologists, neurologists, oncologists, endocrinologists, obstetricians, and others may not be connecting the dots. As such, we felt it would be advantageous to provide an overview of the major adverse event reporting categories so that individuals can share important resources. These adverse events include: cardiac, blood, cancers, neurological, autoimmune, and reproductive. This website also provides a repository of recent publications on various adverse event categories that is beneficial.

Cardiac Adverse Events (CAE)

Do our government officials really care about our health?  Why have we not witnessed an emphasis on the importance of a balanced diet, vitamin supplementation, and physical exercise through our health departments and “elected” leaders? With the closing of gymnasiums, and fitness clubs during lockdowns, our public health policy promoted an increased consumption of fast food and Netflix binge-watching that certainly hit the heart of America as we now see the detrimental effect playing out in real-time. But how have the mRNA gene therapies impacted the physical heart of Americans as well as their entire cardiovascular systems? Would lifestyle changes, better diets, and additional fitness alter the impact of the mRNA gene therapies on individuals?

There is certainly evidence to suggest it would not, given the growing list of incredibly fit and healthy endurance athletes suffering from cardiac events. Suddenly, in 2021 and continuing in 2022, we have witnessed far too many injuries and deaths. At the time of this publication, there have been 603 cardiac events with 374 deaths reported in the international sporting community since January of 2021. Why didn’t we see this in 2020, or 2019, or the prior 20 years?  This is well above a “normal” year according to the research, and anecdotally we rarely have heard of sudden cardiac arrest among athletes during competition. As we discussed in Chapter 8, the increase in cardiac issues among the general public is also growing at an alarming rate. On Saturday, January 29th, 2022, four soccer matches in the UK were halted because of medical incidents in the stands, not on the fields.

Apparently, the cardiovascular issues of myocarditis, heart attack, pulmonary embolisms, etc., are so prevalent in the UK that the media are now attempting to alter the narrative by indicating the cardiac issues stem from post-pandemic stress disorder(PPSD). Is PPSD like post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)? If so, we are confident that those suffering from physical ailments would likely prefer a therapist visit rather than a cardiologist. Is PPSD only applicable to those who have received the mRNA injection? Let’s be honest. There seems to be a strong correlation between vaccination and cardiac events given our own DMSS data indicating a 269% increase in myocardial infarction among our military members.

On a personal level, we know of individuals who have unfortunately died after accepting an mRNA injection. We also know work colleagues who have been diagnosed with myocarditis, subsequently ending many of the joys they used to experience through physical activity. Coupling these realities with a lack of autopsies to determine the cause of death (more on autopsy later) and the unwillingness of physicians to recognize the vaccine injured, families are left with no answers, closure, or legal recourse. So what is really going on?

In Pfizer’s inadequately short clinical trial with over 43,000 participants, it was found that there was a 5x increased risk from fatal heart attacks among the vaccinated over the placebo group (Table S4). Cardiac adverse events were also featured front and center at the October 2020 vaccine safety presentation to garner EUA approval. The EUA should have been dead-on-arrival, resulting in a death pledge to Big Pharma’s cash cow while saving untold human lives. The actual adverse events should have been communicated to the public prior to the mass mRNA gene therapy program rollout. Listing the accurate adverse events would have provided reason to hesitate, especially when our young and healthy children are being targeted. On February 1st, 2022 Pfizer requested US emergency approval for two doses of the three-dose “vaccine” for children under five years old even though the “vaccine” did not show efficacy in their trial. An approval would be wrongful, corrupt, and fiendish but unfortunately, it seems imminent.

But at this point is anyone really surprised at the level of corruption that seems to be pervasive in our society?  Why did our government agencies fail to notice the cardiac event signals within the VAERS system? Why would they wait until the Israelis told us, when we had plenty of evidence that events were happening in the United States? To pediatricians and physicians, are you not concerned that many countries around the world have pulled the “vaccines” for those under 30 years of age due to elevated cardiac events? Again, this has been blacked out by our major media, but the list of nations is below.

1. Belgium,
2. Germany and France,
3. Sweden and Denmark,
4. Norway,
5. Finland,
6. Taiwan.

As of January 27, 2022, Sweden decided against recommending COVID vaccines for kids aged 5-12 because there is no clear benefit in vaccinating them due to the low risk for serious disease in kids. What about the addition of tromethamine as an ingredient to the 5-11-year-old child dosage of the mRNA gene therapies? Was this to prevent cardiac events, as we know this was not an ingredient in the original doses for adults?

It is infuriating that the United States is missing from the list of nations banning these shots for our children. Apparently, our government’s and medical board’s position is that the mRNA jab causes heart problems in the youth of our international community but not the children of the United States. Please take a moment and analyze the dates of most of these vaccine suspensions in other nations. They correlate with the time that the FDA green-lighted vaccines for our 5-11-year-olds on October 29, 2021. Surely those FDA voting members are global enough to be reading this type of news from abroad.

But how many cases of pediatric myocarditis would we see in a typical year prior to the COVID-19 event?  This paper established the pediatric background rate of myocarditis well before COVID-19 became a household name. The analysis of the hospital admissions with myocarditis in Finland occurring in patients aged 15 or younger from 2004-2014 showed that there were 213 pediatric admissions and the overall incidence rate was 1.95/100,000 person-years (4 cases/million/per year). If we extrapolate the incident rate using the United States population, we would diagnose an estimated total of 700 cases of myocarditis in a given year. But our current myocarditis numbers as of December 2021 reveal around 13,000 pediatric cases reported. Cardiologists believe it is the lipid nanoparticle (LNP) surrounding the spike protein that causes so many heart problems because the spike protein seeds the heart/brain, which we can see in the few autopsy reports that are available. A paper posted on July 20, 2021, provided evidence as to why the “vaccines”  spike protein disrupts human cardiac function. See images from Chapter 11 and the impact of LNP’s on mice lungs. It shows conclusive evidence of the inflammatory effect resulting from injecting LNPs into mice bodies.

In May of 2021, the U.S.’s COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Technical (VaST) Working Group, within the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), finally found the time to discuss nearly 500 reports of heart inflammation in vaccinated adults under age 30.  This number continues to increase weekly as we track the VAERS data. While the CDC “investigated” this phenomenon, independent researchers also started analyzing heart inflammation after “vaccination” and discovered that myocarditis and pericarditis were significantly underreported. According to researchers, the “mean monthly number of cases of myocarditis or myocarditis during the pre-vaccine period was 16.9 versus 27.3 during the vaccine period.  The mean numbers of pericarditis cases during the same periods were 49.1 and 78.8, respectively.” While myocarditis was more common in children and males, pericarditis reports tend to affect adults. Regardless, it is clear that we have witnessed a significant increase in myocarditis and pericarditis case rates post-vaccination.

In October of 2021, a report on “Myocarditis Adverse Events in the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System in Association with COVID-19 Injectable Biological Products,” was published and then withdrawn by the editor.  The report used VAERS data to examine cardiac adverse events, primarily myocarditis, reported following injection of the first or second dose of the COVID-19 injectable products:

Myocarditis rates reported in VAERS were significantly higher in youths between the ages of 13 to 23 with ∼80% occurring in males. Within 8 weeks of the public offering of COVID-19 products to the 12-15-year-old age group, we found 19 times the expected number of myocarditis cases in the vaccination volunteers over background myocarditis rates for this age group. In addition, a 5-fold increase in myocarditis rate was observed subsequent to dose 2 as opposed to dose 1 in 15-year-old males. A total of 67% of all cases occurred with BNT162b2. Of the total myocarditis AE reports, 6 individuals died (1.1%) and of these, 2 were under 20 years of age – 1 was 13. These findings suggest a markedly higher risk for myocarditis subsequent to COVID-19 injectable product use than for other known vaccines, and this is well above known background rates for myocarditis.”

Imagine if your loved one suffered from this injury due to the experimental vaccination. According to a publication in Circulation Research, 27% never deviate from regular heart function, 26% fully recover, 34% improve but do not fully recover and 13% never recover from a myocarditis diagnosis. The percentages provided show how debilitating this injury can be as 13% of myocarditis cases end up with progressive heart failure. Sadly, there are children who will be in that 13% category.  We already know this given the cases at Monte Vista Christian School in California where vaccinations were mandated for all students. It is devastating, especially because we know that 86% of kids’ cases of myocarditis end up in the hospital – indicating the injury is not “mild.” What is also clear, is that a young child is far more likely to be injured and diagnosed with myocarditis after vaccination than ever to be hospitalized with a COVID-19 infection. Remember the infection survival rate for 0-19-years old is 99.99973% according to Stanford researchers!

Myocarditis increases in the U.S correlate with increases globally. A study from Hong Kong found that 1 out of 2,300 12-17-year-old boys (217/million doses) who received both Pfizer doses suffered acute myocarditis or pericarditis. Most of the risk came after the second dose. The risk is very similar in college-age men. Based on the passive surveillance report in the US, the risk of myocarditis after receiving mRNA based COVID-19 vaccines was increased across multiple age and sex strata and was highest after the second vaccination dose in adolescent males and young men (males aged 12-15, 71/million doses, males aged 16-17, 106/million doses, males aged 18-24, 56/million doses). An additional report by Hoag, Krug, Stevenson,  and Mandrola (2021) found that,

for boys with no underlying health conditions, the chance of either cardiac adverse events (CAE) or hospitalization from CAE, after their second dose of mRNA vaccination are considerably higher than their 120-day risk of COVID-19 hospitalization, even at times of peak disease prevalence. The long-term consequences of this vaccine-associated cardiac inflammation are not yet fully defined and should be studied.”