by Dr. Amy Cerato and Dr. Eric Snyder
Twenty years ago, 60 minutes ran a story entitled “The most dangerous vaccine,” which quoted Dr. Paul Offit, an infectious disease specialist who works at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, as saying that 1 death per million vaccinated is unacceptable for a vaccine:
“We know if we immunize a million people, that there will be 15 people that will suffer severe, permanent adverse outcomes and one person who may die from the vaccine.”
Smallpox was a horrendous disease with an overall mortality rate estimated at 30%. The disease killed roughly half a billion people over a century before it was eradicated in the 1970’s. In this case, the cure may have been better than the disease, but the smallpox vaccine was far from perfect. A 2003 article in Clinical Medical and Research, provides evidence of the good, the bad and the ugly of smallpox as it remained the most dangerous vaccine known in human history. Table 1 provides reported adverse events from vaccination to smallpox with 53.5 potentially fatal adverse events reported per million vaccinations.
Given the data in Table 1, it is not surprising that the same 60 minutes story also reported Dr. Paul Offit saying that the smallpox vaccine “has a side effect profile that we…. [we] would not accept for vaccines today.” But has this remained true? Is smallpox still the most dangerous vaccine?
Fast forward twenty years, and Dr. Offit would likely be shocked as the rollout of the Emergency Use Authorized single shot Covid-19 vaccination has resulted in an estimated 400 deaths/million doses (the reported rate to the VAERS database is 92 deaths/million–we will discuss underreporting factors later in this chapter). For a two-shot series, one could estimate 800 deaths/million. To be considered “fully vaccinated” individuals would need to take a two-shot series, plus a booster, which would equate to an estimated 1200 deaths/million. If this were a competition in the Beijing Winter Olympics, the smallpox vaccines would be thrown off the top podium and Covid-19 vaccines would take the gold by an incredible margin.
It is devastating to report that currently the mRNA gene therapy inoculations are estimated to be at least 7.5 -23 times more deadly than the smallpox vaccine (this is assuming ALL adverse events from smallpox were fatal). It is also possible that the Covid-19 vaccines are 1200 times more deadly if you compare only the adverse event of smallpox vaccine “deaths” to adverse events of Covid-19 vaccine “deaths.” So how many of our loved ones will be impacted in the United States?
As of January 26, 2022, the US CDC reported 250 million people received at least one dose and 210 million people have been fully vaccinated by J&J’s single dose or the two-dose series made by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna. The CDC also reported that 84 million fully vaccinated people have received a booster dose. To be conservative, we use the 250 million single dose numbers and a death rate of 400/million doses to conclude that roughly 100,800 deaths may have occurred in the U.S. from the vaccines. If we use the 210 million double dose regimen, we’d expect to see 168,000 deaths from the vaccine (The current reported deaths to the VAERS system as of January 14th, 2022 are ~22,193).
For a visual of the correlations between vaccination and an increase in deaths, see Figure 1 below. While there could be various rationales as to why the deaths increase, it would certainly not be possible or plausible to rule out the vaccinations. In fact, it is appropriate to theorize that the vaccinations in conjunction with hospital malpractice are two variables that would explain most of the deaths if we were to analyze the data using a multiple regression equation. Senator Johnson’s recent Covid-19 Second Opinion 5-hour hearing (38-minute video highlights) can provide more evidence that vaccination kills and that our hospital treatment protocols can cause more harm than help. The five-hour testimonies are damning and despairing as we realize how many lies have been told. Why haven’t independent investigations of the vaccine products started?
If 1 death/million vaccinations is unacceptable, the Covid-19 vaccine campaign should have never been approved. Alex Berenson’s (former New York Times reporter) report on the Pfizer clinical trials revealed there was 1 covid-19 death out of 22,000 in the vaccine group (roughly 45 deaths/million extrapolated), plus 5 additional heart attack deaths. Couple that information with an estimated vaccination death rate (0.04-0.12%) for a virus with a childhood mortality rate of 0.002% and one has to wonder what our medical establishment is doing and if they are actually using their brains. We realize how hard many of these individuals have been working, and we remain thankful for their efforts, but at what point do you stand up for medical freedom?
To provide perspective, using the estimates above a child could be 20-60 times more likely to die of the vaccine than the virus before even looking at the rate of potential serious and permanent injuries. This estimate is conservative because 95% of all child deaths with Covid-19 included four or more comorbidities. Toby Rogers, PhD in political economy and pharmaceutical industry researcher, analyzed the Pfizer clinical trial data and found that for every 1 child saved, 117 would die from the inoculations. Here is another analysis that shows that children have a 11.7 times the risk of death from taking the inoculation over dying from Covid-19. So why are we telling families in the United States to inoculate their children with mRNA gene therapies when they:
- Have almost a near zero chance of dying or being permanently injured by Covid-19
- Have a higher statistical chance of dying from the shot and adverse effects of the shot than the virus.
- Will still get infected, transmit, and not be protected if exposed.
- Do not know ALL of the ingredients in the vaccines.
In addition, once an individual contracts COVID-19, there is conclusive evidence to suggest they will have robust natural immunity and near perfect protection against severe re-infection or death (See chapter 6). The risk of taking this dangerous vaccine is illogical, irrational, and absurd. Even in the age demographic of 40-49, the overall mortality rate with the virus is 0.44% and again, many of the deaths had co-morbidities and most of these deaths could have been prevented with early treatment (see chapter 5 on therapeutics).
Should a healthy person within any age demographic even consider accepting a vaccine with such a relatively high mortality and permanent disability rate? Is it ok to discuss the over one million reported adverse effects for the Covid-19 vaccine in the US and the millions more worldwide with an understanding of how underreported these systems are? This is why one should never assume that our government agencies will keep us “safe” or that they will openly discuss issues that could result in negative publicity for leadership. Why are our elected officials not proclaiming from the capitol building to stop these vaccines? We realize that Brandolini’s law is in effect as we battle major media companies and multi-billion dollar advertising campaigns. Yes, these entities have the upper hand, but can you not sense the evil that resonates in our society? This is why individuals must share information and speak honestly and truthfully with friends, family, work colleagues, and community members. It is also why the voices of those doctors and those who have self-reported to an adverse event reporting system need to be heard. We also need to remember to show empathy to those who have lost loved ones due to contracting the virus as these individuals are sick and suffering and their lived experiences are valid.
Adverse Events and Reporting Systems
What if we told you that prior to the vaccination roll out, the vaccine manufacturers and the agencies that the American public were supposed to trust to keep us safe KNEW about the side-effects of the vaccinations from their clinical trial data (this information wasn’t leaked until November 2021)?
Steve Anderson, PhD, MPP Director, Office of Biostatistics & Epidemiology, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) gave a presentation (see slide 16 in Figure 2 ) at the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) in October of 2020 and detailed the adverse events that were surfacing prior to the rollout of the vaccines.
The list of adverse events in Figure 2 are significant and their implications on an individual’s health is consequential. How could our scientists and leaders know this and approve the vaccine? Why weren’t any of these potential side effects listed on the vaccine fact sheets or discussed with people receiving the vaccination (See Figure 3 for side effect list provided to Oklahomans in March 2020 who received Pfizer-BioNtech Covid-19 Vaccines). There is no “death” or “convulsions/seizures” listed as a side effect. In addition, there was a 30% excess mortality found in the vaccination arm of the Pfizer clinical trial. Surely this couldn’t have been disclosed to our federal agencies, otherwise the vaccine wouldn’t have never been rolled out, right? The listing of death, stroke, myocarditis/pericarditis, Kawasaki disease, pregnancy outcomes, etc. certainly changes the risk equation.
But instead, Pfizer informed individuals that they may have joint pain, fever, headache, tiredness or feeling unwell post vaccination (12 side effects were listed from December of 2020). These are vastly different side effects from the updated January 3rd, 2022 fact sheet which now lists 21 side effects including myocarditis and pericarditis. We find it peculiar that the January 3rd, 2022 fact sheet update of side effects looks much more similar to slide 16 from October 22, 2020. Why not disclose these risks initially?
Are pharmaceutical companies being forced to update the Fact Sheet now because of all the reports individuals have submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reports (VAERS) system? For those who want to research adverse event data more, there are multiple options for reporting that are predicated on the nation you live in and the available reporting system that was created. In the United States, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reports (VAERS) system is most commonly used and information on how to report was made available upon inoculation. In Europe, Eudravigilance, Yellowcard (UK), Adverse (Swiss), and others are available. For the rest of the world, VigiaAccess is an option as the database is affiliated with the World Health Organization. Otherwise, entities like Center for Medicare Services (CMS), our military, and the vaccine manufacturers would keep track of individuals who report adverse events. Below is information about each of these systems and their most current reports.
Vaccine Adverse Event Reports (VAERS)
The Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) has been utilized to report adverse events since 1990. OpenVAERS is an offshoot of the VAERS database as they directly download the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) files associated with Covid-19 vaccines weekly and help provide accurate numbers to the public. Could the red-box summaries (Figure 4) provide a rationale as to why strokes and heart disease in healthy young people were recently added to the Fact Sheets of manufacturers of the vaccines? It was certainly not the fraudulent Pfizer trials that surfaced those concerns. Individuals have suffered miscarriages, anaphylaxis, bell’s palsy, shingles, heart disease, organ failure and neurological conditions with more deaths after the Covid-19 vaccine rollout than from all other vaccines since the inception of VAERS in 1990 (See Figure 5). As of January 21, 2022, we have over 1 million reports of adverse reactions to the Covid-19 vaccines.
These reported adverse effects from vaccination continue to rise on VAERS with datasets available for download here. In conversations with those who deny the harm caused by the vaccines, a common argument is that the data does not support causal inference. But an article in Science, Public Health Policy and the Law by Dr. Lyons-Weiler does an excellent job refuting the causal argument as without it pharmacovigilance does not exist. Perhaps the public scrutiny we hear from the FDA, doctors who encourage the vaccines, and pharmaceutical companies are a result of individuals protecting their own interests? If a pharmaceutical trial that lasts 108 days prior to releasing an unsafe vaccination is classified as adequate science, then we would argue that doctors reporting to VAERS that an individual died from a vaccine should be sufficient, right? How about this scientific inference using basic logic and reasoning?
The fraudulent clinical trials and subsequent emergency use authorization of the vaccines by governments worldwide have caused death and incredible suffering (SEE VAERS, Eudravigilance, Yellowcard, Swissmedic, and Vigia Access databases).
We realize that VAERS is a self-reporting and doctor-reporting website (estimates are that 86% of VAERS reports are done by doctors and 14% completed by patients) with flaws and cases where age, health status or injury, not the vaccine, could have been the cause of death. But the sheer reported numbers are mind-boggling for Covid-19 vaccinations. If we were to compare VAERS to other databases around the world, correlations to acute and sub-acute adverse effects exist showing consistency in reported side effects. The VAERS data shows (See Figure 5) that roughly 80% of the adverse events deaths from Covid-19 vaccines occur within 14 days of inoculation. We also know that the CDC does not consider an individual fully vaccinated until 14 days after the 2nd dose, or single dose of Johnson and Johnson. Below is a hypothetical situation.
- Individual receives vaccination.
- Individual has adverse reaction and is taken to hospital before 14 days
- Upon entering the hospital an individual is immediately given a PCR test.
- PCR test is spun at 37 cycle thresholds and pops a positive (read chapter 4 and this article about a recent FBI raid because of fraud in the testing)
- Hospital immediately enters positive Covid-19 Protocols
- Individual passes (death) due to vaccine complications but with a positive Covid-19 test.
The way our current system is set-up, legally the physician on record can list Covid-19 as the cause of death in an “unvaccinated” individual. Plus, there is an incentive to do this as it would result in extra funding to the hospital and the families who are burying their loved one. But how many doctors have ordered autopsies to attempt to discover the true cause of death? We know from Chapter 7 Part 1 that lipid nanoparticles (LNP’s) alone can cause cytokine storms in organs when injected. We also know that the spike proteins can cause inflammation. Figure 6 shows the impact of LNP’s in mice. Do you see how an autopsy might prove to be beneficial in obtaining answers? Those massive inflammatory reactions occur as quickly as 9 hrs. and 24 hrs. and given that we know that most deaths occur in the 24-48 hr. window the question becomes; Is it a coincidence?
If individuals want to learn more about the specific vaccine they were given, they can actually look up this information by manufacturer or lot number. Dr. Craig Paardekooper at Kingston University London created a system where an individual can enter in a batch number of a Pfizer, J&J or Moderna vaccine and determine how many adverse events have been reported according to each batch. The website, How Bad is my Batch is so popular that it recently created a backup website due to high traffic volume. A video describing the site is located here and an article to read is here. Dr. Mike Yeadon (former Pfizer scientist) talks about toxic batches here. If a family member can locate a batch number, and see similar reactions among other individuals that received that batch number, would the naysayers agree that causality thresholds have been met when submitting to VAERS?
In exploring the “How Bad is My Batch” website we were even more alarmed by the non-random patterns within the vaccine products. Especially because we know the importance of quality control when manufacturing a product for human consumption. With thousands of batches (millions of shots), one would expect a random percentage of errors, but instead there seems to exist two types of batches; those that are very dangerous and those that are far less dangerous. In a nutshell, about 10-20% of the lots produce 80-90% of the adverse reactions. It is as if individuals are playing a game of vaccine roulette with a system that may result in validating Perato’s principle. Please share this website with employers, colleagues, or family members that continue to pressure individuals into making illogical health decisions. Encourage individuals to check their batch number on this website if they want to know more about their specific product as the system includes batches that have been sent all over the world. If your batch number is not associated with major adverse events, consider yourself lucky. For those that were less fortunate, our hearts hurt and we will continue to shed light on the truth as your death will not occur in vain.
EudraVigilance System
Europe’s database of suspected adverse drug reaction reports, EudraVigilance is another source for adverse event data. Note that this link takes you to a search for “suspected adverse drug reaction reports for Products.” You can click on the letter of the product you are interested in and a list will populate. This page does NOT come up in an internet search if you simply search for COVID-19 Eudravigilance – you need a direct link. To save you time, we are providing you direct access to the specific vaccines within the Eudravigilance system by using the links below:
COVID-19 MRNA Vaccine Moderna (CX-024414)
COVID-19 MRNA Vaccine Pfizer-Biontech (Tozinameran or Brand Name:
COVID-19 Vaccine Astrazeneca (CHADOX1 NCOV-19)
COVID-19 Vaccine Janssen (AD26.COV2.S)
Please note that nowhere on the EudraVigilance system is a summary of all the adverse drug reaction reports. Because of this we looked to others to concisely summarize this data for faster consumption. As of December 18, 2021, the Eudravigilance system reported 34,337 deaths from the Covid-19 vaccines.
Yellow Card System – UK
Bless the British and their easy-to-use websites and transparent data reporting. The UK’s Yellow Card System allows physicians and individuals to report adverse events in a central database. The COVID-19 adverse events have been summarized in weekly reports and published here.
Swissmedic – Adverse Vaccination Reactions (AVRs)
Switzerland and Liechtenstein have their own reporting system. The rate of reported adverse events compared to the vaccines administered is relatively high (1,970/1,000,000) for small countries with a combined population of 5.8 million. It is clear that young healthy individuals show a large negative risk-benefit in accepting the vaccination in these nations. We know that the risk of Guillain Barre Syndrome after the flu shot is 1-2 per million so the resulting 730/per million serious side effects in this report is gargantuan. As an example:
- For a young, healthy person, the risk of catching and being admitted to hospital with COVID-19 is 1 in 2,532 (This # is overstated because they haven’t delineated between primary and incidental hospitalizations. Now that they are recording that data, it is around 50-50, so a better estimate is 1 in 5,000 chance of hospitalization),
- The risk of the same young healthy person dying from COVID-19 is 1 in 200,000
- The risk of a serious adverse reaction from the vaccine is 1 in 1,370.
What would you do or encourage your loved one to do? Why hasn’t information like this been presented to the public?
Vigi-Access
Have you seen the World Health Organization’s (WHO) VigiAccess site? If you would like to peruse their site, please accept the terms of the search at the bottom of the first page and type these exact words in with this exact capitalization (inside the quotes), “Covid-19 vaccine”. As of January 23, 2022, there were over THREE MILLION reported adverse reactions (3,060,465). Have we provided enough information yet? Do not worry, there is much much more to come.
When do adverse events occur?
Dr. Vladimir Zelenko, a pioneer for early treatment of Covid-19, played a critical role in identifying three windows of time where certain adverse events from the vaccination occur. Dr. Zelenko presented these concerns to the Rabbinical Court (consisting of Israeli politicians and the Health Ministry) in August of 2021. The acute, subacute, and long term timeframes have been found to result in various side effects which range from blood clots, inflammation of the heart and miscarriages, pathologically disastrous immune reactions and infertility (damage to ovarian function and reducing sperm count). We will detail the main side effects in the next chapter and provide up to date research on the topic.
Dr. Zelenko accurately pointed out that “Israel is the biggest study in the world” for how these vaccines react in a human population as the country is now offering their 4th shots/booster to the population. Why did Israeli leadership enter into an agreement with Pfizer to mass vaccinate and provide public health data in exchange for vaccine supply? Why is there a pattern that shows after vaccination a spike in cases follows? Hasn’t Pfizer been able to “evaluate whether herd immunity protection is observed during the vaccination program rollout?” Yes, Pfizer has, and if they were paying attention to what really matters, they would recognize the vaccination adverse events and subsequent health issues that have surfaced. But the result of doing so would require the vaccines to be stopped. Israel’s case rate in the last month is higher than ever as they approved their fourth booster! Below are timeframes that warrant your consideration as you learn more about side effects and adverse events.
- Acute: This type of event occurs from the moment of injection to about three months post-injection. The number one “serious” acute risk of the shot seems to be blood clots that occur within the first 24-48 hrs. Others include fever, rashes, and negative neurological responses. According to the Salk Institute, a person who receives the vaccine produces spike proteins which migrate to the endothelium (the inside of your blood vessels) and form little spikes (think thorns) on the inside of your vasculature (see the autopsy section in Part 3 of this chapter and, for example, minute 21:30 in this symposium video, and the effects of lipid nanoparticles image in Figure 6 within this chapter). As your blood cells circulate they are damaged by the spikes and clotting can occur. If it happens in the heart, it’s a heart attack; if it happens in the brain, it is a stroke. Given that we know the spike protein and the lipid nanoparticles that carry the spike proteins are both known to cause inflammatory responses and potential to clot, it is no wonder that there has been a substantial increase in myocarditis in children and young adults. This makes logical sense because the inflammatory responses of the vaccines happen so quickly. This expands the heart muscle to a point where recession impacts its ability to flow adequately (see Figure 8 regarding increase in myocarditis cases).
Figure 8: Comparison of Cardiac Events from 2019 to 2021 as a function of age (as of October 2021) after Rose and McCullough 2021. - Subacute: Animal studies that analyzed the vaccines do show that the animals responded well in generating antibodies. Generating antibodies is different from generating antibodies that support your immunological response. While factually accurate from a scientific standpoint, individuals really need to ask the following question: How did the animals respond when they were infected by the virus they were immunized against? The results are not promising as a large percentage of the animals died (video discussing these animal studies). When researchers investigated why the animals passed, they discovered that their own immune system killed them. The medical term for this phenomenon is Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE) or Pathogenic Priming, or Paradoxical Immune Enhancement and we will detail its existence in Chapter 8. We concede that individuals could make the argument that human beings are different from animals. The truth is, we are now the experiment as researchers skipped additional animal research and started injecting individuals with the mRNA gene therapies. A subacute reaction could result from an individual being vaccinated and then exposed to the virus months later. Other subacute reactions include autoimmune disorders, heart attacks, strokes, pericarditis, etc. (this list is not exhaustive)
- Longterm: There is evidence that the full-length spike affects fertility in terms of damaged ovarian function and reduced sperm counts. The full-length spike also increases autoimmune diseases. Evidence also indicates that those with blood cancer might not have an appropriate immune response. These effects may take years to realize as the body continues to function with the mRNA gene therapy.
While the data regarding the acute, subacute, and long-term effects continues to be analyzed, many doctors have started to speak up. Dr. McCollough has courageously spoken all over the country about the adverse events and the safety of the vaccination program:
These safety events are way out of line. This vaccine is nowhere close to being safe. Americans are going to bear the brunt of what invariably is going to be a failed mass vaccination program that will go down as one of the most deadly, one of the most injurious and costly in human history.”
We use the word courageously because after speaking out against the narrative, Dr. McCollough was publicly vilified to the point that Baylor University – Baylor, Scott and White Medical Center filed a motion for a restraining order to clarify that Dr. McCollough did not represent the views of the medical center. As the narrative continues to crumble though, Baylor Scott and White may turn out to regret this decision as Dr. McCollough deserves incredible accolades for his commitment to science, treating patients, and a love for humanity.
In June, an additional doctor, Dr. Malone tweeted the following:
Turns out Dr. Malone was right about ivermectin as we now have 76 peer reviewed studies that show its clinical efficacy. He is also correct about the safety issues of the vaccines. Perhaps most importantly, Dr. Malone’s recent speech on January 23, 2022 at the Defeat the Mandates Rally in Washington, DC issued a grave warning to parents. Did anyone see this event broadcasted live on mainstream television? What about the Canadian trucker convoy that is protesting against vaccine mandates this week in Canada? How about the protests that occur every weekend in Sweden, Germany, France, the UK, Australia, and other nations that have garnered the attention of the entire world, except the 6 major media corporations that control our news? Wake up America! Dr. Malone’s quote from his speech is below:
As a parent, those that are parents or going to be parents, it is ultimately your responsibility to protect your children. The vaccines do not protect our children from becoming infected with Omicron. They do not prevent infected children from infecting others. In contrast, the pharmaceutical companies and the government are almost fully protected from any damages these products might cause them. If they’re harmed by these genetic vaccines, you are the one who will have to take care of them. And you will carry the burden for the rest of your life and theirs. On average, between 1-in-2000 and 1-in-3000 children that receive these vaccines will be hospitalized in the short-term with vaccine-caused damage. They may damage their brains, their heart, their immune system, and their ability to have children in the future. Many of these damages cannot be repaired. Only with the passage of time will we know what long-term damage may occur to these children. So I beg you, please get informed about the possible risks. Your children may be damaged by these experimental products.”
There have been countless other heroic individuals that continue to emphasize the negative acute, subacute, and long-term consequences of these vaccines. These individuals have nothing to gain in fighting the narrative, in fact, most have everything to lose. When an individual is willing to lose everything to inform the public of a serious situation, they at a minimum deserve to be heard, especially in the face of continued censorship and authoritarianism by the powers that be.
Factor Calculations
Most doctors and healthcare administrators will agree that there is significant underreporting of adverse side effects to the VAERS system. This hot button issue remains timely and knowing the underreporting factor remains fundamental in our scientific efforts to obtain accurate data. The much cited Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Inc. Health and Human Services (HHS) funded study (Grant ID: R18 HS 017045) from 2007-2010 aimed to improve the safety of the national vaccination program by analyzing reports submitted to the VAERS system. In their final report they noted the following:
Adverse events from drugs and vaccines are common but underreported. Although 25% of ambulatory patients experience an adverse drug event, less than 0.3% of all adverse drug events and 1-13% of serious events are reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported. Low reporting rates preclude or slow the identification of “problem” drugs and vaccines that endanger public health. New surveillance methods for drug and vaccine adverse effects are needed. Barriers to reporting include a lack of clinician awareness, uncertainty about when and what to report, as well as the burdens of reporting: reporting is not part of clinicians’ usual workflow, takes time, and is duplicative. Proactive, spontaneous, automated adverse event reporting embedded within EHRs and other information systems has the potential to speed the identification of problems with new drugs and more careful quantification of the risks of older drugs.
Unfortunately, there was never an opportunity to perform system performance assessments because the necessary CDC contacts were no longer available and the CDC consultants responsible for receiving data were no longer responsive to our multiple requests to proceed with testing and evaluation.” (From Page 6 in Results section)
These researchers were awarded $999,995 to do this study. Why would the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) award almost 1 million dollars in grant money for a study and then simply be non-responsive or “no longer available?” Is it possible that someone (e.g., CDC, HHS, etc.) decided they didn’t like the outcome of the study and instructed the right people to simply stop communicating with the researchers?
The Harvard-Pilgrim Health Care, Inc. Study showed that fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events were reported over a 30-day period for the length of their 3 year project. They determined this by identifying every patient receiving a vaccine and following their health care diagnostic codes, laboratory tests and medication prescriptions for thirty days to determine if they were suggestive of an adverse vaccine event. When a possible adverse event was detected, it was recorded, and the appropriate clinician was notified electronically and provided with a preview of a pre-populated report that they could choose to send to VAERS if they wished. Even with this user-friendly interface, with all the patient data from the medical charts already pre-populated, only 1% of the clinicians chose to submit the adverse events to VAERS. This is perturbing because if only 1% of adverse events are reported when the clinician only has to hit the “SEND” button on a report; what is the likelihood a clinician will actually sit down with the VAERS database and manually enter data in all mandatory fields?
While the Harvard-Pilgrim study investigated the underreporting trends for all vaccines, it is important to calculate the under-reporting for COVID-19 vaccines specifically. This number is significant, especially as individuals determine accurate risk-benefit ratios across age groups prior to conferring true informed consent. Is it possible to calculate an accurate risk-benefit if the CDC is intentionally hiding safety signals and we are under-reporting adverse effects that should be used to understand the safety of a vaccine?
The safety signal analysis employed by the CDC, Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and associated regulatory agencies uses methods that are not simply ill-suited to the task, but mask substantial indications that large numbers of people are being injured, often seriously, or even killed by the COVID-19 vaccines currently in use. The inequivalent definitions used in mortality calculations results in inexcusably rigged risk-benefit analyses, and the lack of investigation into causes of mortality (both for the COVID-19 disease and also for the COVID-19 vaccines) stands out as historically monumental malpractice and dereliction of duty. The mass vaccination program should be halted while true risk-benefits of the vaccines are assessed, and regulatory agencies fully investigated for conflicts of interest and intention to defraud the public of its opportunity for informed consent.”
We agree, and we now know that mortality calculations by the CDC are faulty, and the lack of investigations into Covid-19 vaccine injuries by the CDC are monumental. But what about underreporting of Covid-19 vaccine injuries? In July of 2021, a Whistleblower from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) utilized the Medicare and Medicaid database maintained by CMS to show an underreporting factor of about 4-5. The Medicare and Medicaid data revealed the real number of deaths due to the COVID-19 vaccines to be about 45,000 at the time, which was roughly 5 times what was shown on the VAERS database.
Another researcher conducting an analysis of the VAERS database in August of 2021, estimated an underreporting factor of 30. A white paper by Kirsh, Rose and Crawford details the methodology used to determine an under-reporting factor of 41 based on a ratio between the CDC and VAERS reported rate of anaphylaxis and observed anaphylaxis in a COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial setting.
This short video steps through a procedure of calculating the potential under-reporting factor using the Pfizer Phase III clinical trial serious adverse event occurrence in the vaccine arm and comparing it to the VAERS reported serious adverse events; the URF for serious adverse events was calculated at 31. In October 2021, researchers compared vaccine-induced fatality rate (VFR) estimates with the CDC-reported VFR (0.002%) and found that the VAERS deaths may be underreported by a factor of 20. They compared their age-stratified VFRs with published age-stratified coronavirus infection fatality rates (IFR) and found that the risks of COVID vaccines and boosters outweigh the benefits in children, young adults, and older adults with low occupational risk or previous coronavirus exposure. Table 2 below provides links to the studies and their under-reporting factor estimates. The science within these publications is strong.
Given these under-reporting factors, and utilizing the VAERS database, we can then calculate an estimate of how many Americans have died from the Covid-19 vaccines. As of January 14th, 2022 there were 10,162 deaths attributed to the US and US Territories reported to the VAERS database and 251 million people in America that have received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine (40.5 deaths/ 1 million vaccinations). For the sake of calculating American deaths, we will use the 251 million number. There exists variance in the underreporting factors above, and for accuracy purposes, we will provide low and high bounds for the number of excess deaths caused by the vaccine: One way is to use 86% based on the analysis in the Mclachlan study, and another is to use 60% based on the estimate determined from autopsies Dr. Peter Schirmacher performed (use Google Chrome and Google Translate to read the page). The deaths estimated using these underreporting factors and likelihood that the vaccine caused every reported death on VAERS puts the death toll between 24,400 – 865,000. That is a rate of 97 to 3,450 deaths per million from the vaccine in the United States alone.
For those that may feel that the VAERS database has limitations, what about using the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) to calculate some under-reporting factors? This database is the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch’s (AFHSB) “web-based tool to remotely query de-identified active component personnel and medical event data contained within the Defense Medical Surveillance System (DMSS).” The database contains every International Classification of Diseases (ICD) medical billing code for all medical diagnoses submitted by the military for medical insurance billing. It is highly controlled and closed, meaning that only the Department of Defense (DoD) personnel are in this system and only medical providers can input data into this system.
To provide of glimpse of the serious advent event reporting (SAE) to the DMED, we will analyze spontaneous abortion (miscarriage) reports. According to the data reported, the number of spontaneous abortions for the past 5 years (2016-2020) was 1,499. That’s about 300 spontaneous abortions per year for the past 5 years. The total number of women enlisted and on active duty in the U.S. military in 2020 was 226,417, therefore the background rate based on DMED data is 132 spontaneous abortions per 100,000 women. The DMED data set is not set up for interpretation even if you think that VAERS is. The military medical personnel are the only people allowed to input medical information and the coding system. Now, let’s look at the same serious adverse event, spontaneous abortion, in VAERS to determine the URF for this specific SAE.
According to VAERS data, in 2021 the number of reports of spontaneous abortions was 3,527. The number of females injected in the U.S. with at least one dose of COVID-19 product is 128,964,332 according to the CDC. Therefore, the rate of reporting of spontaneous abortions in VAERS is 2.7/100,000 women. If the background rate of spontaneous abortions using the DMED data is 132 spontaneous abortions per 100,000 women, then the underreporting factor (URF) is 49 (132/2.7 = 49). When we apply this URF we get 172,823 spontaneous abortions.
While those numbers are nauseating, even the raw reported number of 40.5 deaths/million vaccinations shows an intolerable level of malevolence that exists in this world. What is wrong with our leadership! We could cut that number in HALF and the resulting 20 deaths/ 1 million still placed Covid-19 vaccines as #1 in adverse deaths. Any product that is TWENTY TIMES more deadly than the smallpox vaccine should unequivocally be deemed an unacceptable number for today’s standards. This safety profile is repulsive and what makes it even worse is that Pfizer provided the data that showed a negative all-cause mortality in their 6-month evaluation report on the mismanaged trials. Pfizer published this information along with all of the data in supplement tables and not one major media outlet covered the story?
What regulatory agency spoke out? There were 20 deaths in the vaccinated and 14 deaths in the placebo arm after unblinding (Supplemental Documentation) the clinical trials. The evaluation of the Pfizer vaccine showed an increase in mortality (30%) after taking the vaccine. Does it not make you sick that for the past two years all the commercials and government propaganda has been focused on the relative risk reduction of the vaccines against infection, hospitalization, or death from COVID because it sounds good – vaccine efficacy of “90%” or “75%, ” but what these same entities fail to discuss is what the absolute risk reduction of accepting a vaccine would be (more on this in the next chapter).
In fact, an absolute risk reduction factor is what the FDA recommends and the American public should demand it along with the absolute all-cause mortality benefit of any vaccine. These data points should be required to be told to participants prior to inoculation because all-cause mortality is key. If there is no improvement in all-cause mortality, the vaccine shouldn’t even be considered.
Overall Excess Mortality
Is it really a surprise that recent articles have been published showing that there is a nationwide surge in mortality rates across most age groups? Deaths among individuals ages 18-64 are elevated 65% in the United States. Given the outcome of the Pfizer trial (30% increase in all-cause mortality) and the massive deaths caused by the Covid-19 vaccines (estimates of 24,400 to 865,000), the 65% increase in all-cause mortality should not be a shock. If a person was injected by the vaccine the odds of death are undoubtedly higher. The younger the individual, the greater the disparity.
In Indiana, an insurance company recently reported that the death rate was up 40% over pre-pandemic levels among working age people ages 18-64. OneAmerica CEO Scott Anderson disclosed that the insurance company is seeing the highest death rates they have seen in the history of the insurance business – worse than a one-in-200-year catastrophe. They are also seeing an uptick in both short- and long-term disability claims.
To provide perspective regarding the 1 in 200 year catastrophe. When actuaries calculate policy premiums, they tier the probability of an event occurring. A 10% increase in death rates during a given year is equivalent to a 1-200 year event. A 40% increase is probably not even calculated because it is unfathomable. Do you think your life insurance premium will rise next year? How will Americans pay for the increase in short and long-term disability claims? Who should be held accountable? Will bankruptcy courts be packed?
Across the entire United States, from October of 2020 to October of 2021 deaths across most age groups were well above the same period in 2018-2019 according to the CDC death certificate database. Excess deaths were highest in the five states below:
- Nevada (up 65%, of which only 36% were labeled as Covid)
- Texas (up 61%, 58% of them labeled Covid)
- Arizona (up 57%, 37% labeled Covid)
- Tennessee (up 57%, 37% labeled Covid)
- California (up 55%, 42% labeled Covid)
That’s way too many dead Americans!
The three lowest states were:
- New Hampshire — no increase
- Massachusetts increased 13% (24% of that labeled Covid)
- New York was up 29% (30% labeled Covid)
The uneven distribution of unexpected excess deaths is highly suggestive of a non-natural cause. Overall, a part of the surge could be likely blamed on drug overdoses, which increased to more than 101,000 in the 12 months ending June 2021 from about 72,000 in 2019, the CDC estimated. About two-thirds of those deaths involved synthetic opioids including fentanyl that are often smuggled to the United States from China through Mexico.
For those ages 50 to 84, mortality increased more than 27 percent, representing more than 470,000 excess deaths. Almost four out of five of the deaths had COVID-19 marked on the death certificate as the cause or a contributing factor.
The all-cause excess mortality of the entire United States is shown in Figure 11 from the beginning of 2020 through present and compared with that of Oklahoma over the same timeframe. The United States is currently hovering at 14% excess all-cause mortality, while Oklahoma weighs in at 39%.
But does the excess death rate also exist for our children? Figure 12 is the most recent CDC wonder data available. The increase in deaths from alcohol/drug use among our teenagers doubled during the first year of Covid-19 as our public policies kept many of our children at home in isolation. We know that isolation is not healthy for humans as we are social beings. Clinically there exists a linear progression from stress, to anxiety, to depression to isolation, with a subsequent final outcome of suicide. We know that isolating our children has added to the excess mortality, as the number of kids in a USCF Benioff Children’s hospital in California doubled from 2019 to 2020. An additional hospital in Indianapolis, Riley Hospital for Children reported an increase in teen hospitalization after attempts to commit suicide from 67 in 2019 to 108 in 2020. Facts like these calls to question the decisions of our leaders since the inception of this event. They also require our leadership to provide answers to the public about their decisions as suicide rates among teens has also doubled.
Summary
Given the information provided, a letter of cease and desist, along with a notice of liability should be sent to all individuals who continue to perpetuate the “safe” and “effective” vaccine narrative. In this chapter we have provided conclusive evidence that the Covid-19 mRNA gene therapies/shots are the most dangerous “vaccines” ever distributed in human history. We have also provided conclusive evidence that “informed consent” was obtained using inadequate and fraudulent information. Perhaps more troubling is the fact that in October of 2020, individuals knew the adverse side effects that could result from these shots and this information was kept from the American public and the world.
Furthermore, individuals who were not provided accurate information to conduct a legitimate risk-reward analysis prior to accepting the vaccine should be provided some form of legal recourse. The legality associated with Emergency Use Authorization has been compromised and whitewashed. A review of published risk/benefit ratios using various databases show devastating outcomes ranging from 2:3, meaning that for every three lives saved, two would die from inoculation to 117:1 in children, meaning that for every 1 child saved, 117 children would die. Couple these factors with available therapeutic options, the ability to correlate vaccine batches to adverse events, inaccurate data, faulty tests, and fraudulent “causes” of death on death certificates and it is clear the “experimental” vaccine and its roll out has violated almost all of the basic tenets of research and human rights.
Under Article 32 of the 1949 Geneva Convention, “mutilation and medical or scientific experiments not required for the medical treatment of a protected person” are prohibited. Both the Nuremberg Code and federal regulations provide that no one can force a human being to participate in this experiment. Under 21 U.S. Code Sec.360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III), “authorization for medical products for use in emergencies,” it is unlawful to deny someone a job or an education because they refuse to be an experimental subject. Instead, potential recipients have an absolute right to refuse EUA vaccines.
These unprecedented mandated experimental vaccination programs also violate the 1947 Nuremberg code – that states in article 1 that:
The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.”
Article 6 states that:
The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment,” and article 10 states that “During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.”
How many deaths or adverse events does it take for citizens or those in our governments to step in and stop an experimental program? Certainly tens of thousands less than what has been reported in VAERS, Eudra Vigilance, Yellowcard, Swissmedic, or Vigia Access – especially for an illness that has a greater than 99.7% survivability rate, without early treatment, across all demographics. The “vaccines” should be stopped immediately and investigations, like those launched on January 28th, 2022 in the UK should commence immediately in Oklahoma and the United States. There have been far too many individuals injured, far too many families broken, and children hurt, and the management of this event has been disastrous at best. What are you doing about it?
Questions to Consider
- Why are the large number of adverse events reported to the pharmacovigilance systems worldwide being ignored?
- Where are the original data on the vaccine trials and why haven’t they undergone independent reviews to check safety and efficacy claims?
- If the vaccines are safe and effective, then why do the manufacturers need liability protection?
- If the vaccines are safe, why aren’t any of the organizations that mandate vaccines accepting liability?
- If the vaccine company is notified of an individual who suffered from an adverse event, are they required by law to then report to the VAERS system?
- Given the animal research on lipid nanoparticles, why would we approve this product for human injection?
“The Nazi medical experiments are an example of this sadism, for in the use of concentration camp inmates and prisoners of war as human gunea pigs, very little, if any, benefit to science was achieved. It is a tale of horrors of which the German medical profession cannot be proud. Although the ‘experiments’ were conducted by a fewer than two hundred murderous quacks – albeit some of them held eminent posts in the medical world – their criminal work was known to thousands of leading physicians of the Reich, not a single one of whom, so far as the record shows, ever uttered the slightest public protest” – William L. Shirer, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich
Chapter 12: Undue Risk, Specific Adverse Events, and Autopsy’s after Covid-19 Inoculations
