2020 Election

As we have drawn closer to the January 6th Joint Session of Congress, conservative sites and news sources have had no short supply of opinions and methods that could be used to secure a Trump victory. We at Ignite Liberty have chosen to remain mostly silent on the issue. It’s not because we don’t have an opinion, but the last thing we felt was needed was yet another conservative voice adding their legal opinion to an already confusing situation.

The truth is that nobody knows exactly how this election is going to play out because there is very little precedent to look to for guidance. So rather than engage in endless speculation, we chose to wait until closer to January 6th to see which paths begin to emerge as likely routes to a Trump victory. Over the last 24-48 hours, two such paths have come into focus. We will discuss those below.

Before we do that, there was an important event that took place over the weekend which gives us more context as to the overall landscape of Trump’s strategy. The Washington Times released a transcript of a call between Trump and Georgia Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger. Initially, they just released a redacted portion which painted the President in a bad light. After pressure from the President’s team and others, they released the entire transcript.

We won’t go into the details of the entire call here. If you want to read it for yourself, you can do so here. The overall call could be summarized as Trump playing “bad cop/good cop” all by himself. Trump essentially let Raffensperger know that they had much more evidence than he was aware of, evidence that looked “very bad” for the Georgia Secretary of State, potentially even criminal. Trump, then, gave him the opportunity to come clean, admit to voter fraud that would be sufficient to give Trump the victory in Georgia (which he won by over 400K votes), and be spared criminal prosecution.

Instead, Raffensperger refused and chose to leak a partial recording of the call to the Washington Times. As we’ve learned from the Impeachment hoax, President Trump has the National Intelligence Agency record all of his phone calls. So Raffensperger’s attempt to frame the President fell woefully short. Then this morning the White House announced that the Secret Service would be opening and investigation into Raffensperger according to the Espionage Act (likely due to his known connections with the CCP).

What this represented was a brilliant piece of strategy by the President that give us a clue into his overall approach. Great chess players, like Trump, know that you don’t put your opponent in check until checkmate is certain. Putting your opponent in check serves as a warning to him that defeat is imminent. Great chess players only do that when their opponent’s only way out of check is to walk directly into a checkmate trap.

That seems to be exactly what is happening here. As Trump told Raffensperger, he has evidence of widespread fraud that nobody has ever seen. The President is literally holding all of the cards, and only a select few people know to full breadth of evidence that he has. As we move forward, he will likely give the Left the opportunity to come clean and concede (some sources are saying that Biden is even preparing to capitulate), as he did with Raffensperger. If they do not, as they likely won’t, they will meet the same end of criminal prosecution to the fullest extent of the law. Regardless of whether they concede or not, it still ends with Trump being sworn in on January 20th.

One thing we know for sure, based on the President’s and VP’s own statements, is that Trump is going to use these next two weeks to fully state his case before the world and expose the full length and breadth of the evil that he has been fighting against. In order for that evil to be defeated, it had to be this way…it always had to be this way.

The Cruz Committee

The first of two likely routes to a Trump victory was proposed by Texas Senator Ted Cruz. In keeping with the solution to the contested election of 1877, Sen Cruz has proposed creating an Emergency Election Fraud Committee to hold 10 days of hearings where the President’s team could submit their evidence of voter fraud in each of the 6 swing states.

In 1877, Congress created a 15-person committee with 5 Senators, 5 Congressmen, and 5 Supreme Court Justices. After 2 weeks of deliberation, the committee voted 8-7 along straight party-lines to hand the election to the Republican candidate Rutherford B. Hayes. The concession that was used to get Congress to abide by the decision of the committee was to completely remove federal troops from the South, where many had still remained some 12 years after the Civil War.

It is unclear at this point exactly how Sen Cruz’s proposal would work. In 1877, Congress agreed to be bound by the decision of the committee. Whether this Congress would agree to be bound by such terms, or to simply take the committee’s findings under advisement, is yet to be seen. Such an agreement would be in keeping with precedent, which is why this proposal is good one.

However, in 1877, the Chinese Communist Party didn’t have large portions of Congress under their direct influence, which would raise serious concerns of criminal prosecution for those compromised Congressmen and Senators should Trump prove victorious. In no uncertain terms, they are literally fighting for their lives and freedom over ours, which would make any assumption that they would do whatever it took to ensure a fair and honest election a spurious one at best…regardless of the cost to the Republic.

The Pence Plan

The second path, and perhaps cleanest, was proposed today by Jenna Ellis, lead Counsel for the Trump Campaign. She stated in an appearance on Just The News network’s The Water Cooler with David Brody, that the Vice President would have the ability to send the dueling slates of electors back to the states in question prior to opening the slates of electors during the Joint Session on the 6th:

“What Mike Pence could do, and what he should do, in fact, is to direct a question back to the state legislatures when there are two competing slates of delegates from these six states, he can ask that question to the states and say, ‘well, state legislators, you know, I have an oath to the Constitution to uphold the Constitution as written in Article II Section 1.2 which says the state legislatures direct the manner in which electoral delegates are selected. So you tell me which of these two slates was selected in the manner that your state general assembly has designated.

And that’s a fair question. That’s not exercising discretion. That’s not setting up any sort of bad precedent. That’s actually returning the authority to the constitutionally vested entity and just simply directing that question I think would then require a response from these very timid, to put it lightly, state legislators that haven’t been willing to act, and it would in fact then give a very clean outcome to this election,”

The genius part of this strategy is that the Democrats would be powerless to stop it. Pence would be fully authorized to use his plenary power to force the State legislatures to do their job. Important to note is that legislators from Pennsylvania, Georgia, and Arizona have already made it known that they wish to decertify the Democrat electors. Indeed, some of them may do that before the 6th. So Pence kicking the issue back to the States would allow those legislatures to use their plenary power to officially correct their slate of electors.

This strategy would solve the main problem of securing President Trump’s re-election, and leave the criminal prosecution fallout for after the inauguration.

The Role of the Georgia Runoff

Should the Democrat’s win the Georgia Senate runoff elections on the 5th, it is unclear whether the new Senators would be seated in time for the Joint Session on the 6th. Of course the Democrat’s would do everything possible to ensure their participation, assuming there was a clear winner on the 5th, which is  unlikely due to the absolute refusal of Raffensperger to address the voter fraud issues stemming from the November 3rd election. It will likely take weeks to determine the real winners of the runoffs.

It is quite possible that Pence’s decision on whether to kick the dueling slates of electors back tot he States would hinge entirely on the Georgia runoff. Should it not go in favor of the GOP, he would be more inclined to act. If Perdue and Loeffler do win their runoffs, he might be more inclined to allow the Cruz plan to come to a vote. If that vote fails, or appears to fail, he could then send the electoral slates back to the States.

The Role of the 12th Amendment

Should the Pence plan be enacted, it will likely come with a deadline 2-3 days before inauguration. Should the States fail to meet that deadline, their electors would not be counted. That leaves one of 2 possibilities: 1) the winner is determined by whoever has a majority of the available electors from all the states that verified their slates, or 2) the winner is determined by a contingent vote in Congress, as per the 12th Amendment.

Which of these possibilities would be used would hinge on defining what the Constitution meant by requiring the winner to have a majority of the “available electors.” Does it mean all available electors, regardless of whether the States certify the correct slate or not? If so, then failure of the States to meet Pence’s deadline would mean it would be impossible for either candidate to reach the 270 votes needed to secure the Presidency. That would then trigger the State contingent votes in Congress under the 12th Amendment, where the House of Representatives would vote by State for the President and the Senate would vote for the Vice President. In that case, Trump would secure the Presidency and Pence would presumably secure the Vice Presidency.

If, however, it is determined that the Constitution requires a majority of the legally allowable electors, then Trump/Pence would would easily win.

The Odds

Given everything above, the likelihood of President Trump securing another 4 years is quite high. It seems like the path that makes the most sense is the Pence plan. It allows for the least amount of Democrat interference while insulating both the President and Vice President from claims that they violated the will of the people and “stole” the election from Biden. Of course, the Democrats will still claim that regardless of what happens, but at least the truth would be on the side of the President.

Most importantly, it emphasizes the Rule of Law. Trump has stated repeatedly throughout his presidency that he believes in letting the States decide as many issues as possible. Given that the Constitution vests the sole power for choosing electors in the States, this would be the most constitutionally consistent method of solving this crisis.

UPDATE:

During the writing of this article, the Epoch Times released an article stating that 12 Georgia State Senators are sending a letter to VP Pence tomorrow asking him to delay the counting of electoral votes for “10-12 days.” This would be in keeping with the “Pence Plan” as mention above.

COPYRIGHT © 2021 · IGNITE LIBERTY

Smartmatic has been at the center of the Election crisis ever since it was discovered that their ImageCast software that is imbedded in the Dominion voting machines, which was created by the Hugo Chavez regime to ensure that he never lost an election, was discovered to have been used by Democrats to flip the elections in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia, Arizona, Nevada, and likely a host of other states. In all of these states, the voting machines in questions were Dominion Voting System’s Democracy Suite.

While Dominion has been rightly demonized in this Election, they are likely not the only problematic company related to this election. The Epoch Times reported in a November 23rd article that the capital investment group (H.I.G. Capital) that owns both Dominion and Hart Intercivic had been investigated in 2019 by a bipartisan group of lawmakers comprising of Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), and Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) because of concerns regard the safety of their voting systems.

Ignite Liberty discovered an EVEREST Study (Evaluation and Validation of Election Related Equipment, Standards and Testing) commissioned by the State of Ohio in 2007 that revealed massive security flaws in the EVS (electronic voting systems) by both Hart Intercivic and Premier (which later was sold to Dominion in 2010). You can read that article here. Additionally, we discovered a January 16, 2011 article in The Oklahoman that highlighted the purchase of Hart Intercivic voting machines for use statewide in Oklahoma elections. It has been used here ever since.

After revealing this information, Ryan Hill, a local citizen-journalist and friend of Ignite Liberty, notified us over the weekend that our social media posts regarding Hart Intercivic’s role in Oklahoma elections motivated him to examine voting patterns in the major counties in our state. That examination revealed certain troubling patterns in the absentee voting patterns in Oklahoma, Cleveland, Payne, and Tulsa counties. Mr. Hill stated the reason he looked at just the absentee votes was because of the security of Oklahoma’s voting laws would have made cheating in early voting or election day voting nearly impossible. If there was voter fraud it would have to be in the absentee votes since those are not counted at the precinct level.

We have since analyzed the same voting patterns and compared them with historical averages over the last 5 election cycles (going back to the 2012 general election). We compared the voting turnout for the main Republican and Democrat candidates for Presidential, Senatorial, Congressional, County Clerk, County Court Clerk, and Sheriff races in Oklahoma County. We then used the change in the number of registered voters as a control group to determine if the trends we were seeing could be answered by a sudden shift in Republican and/or Democrat registered voters. All of the data we used has been pulled from the Oklahoma County Election Board’s website. Our findings are published below.

Before we begin, we must stress that we are NOT accusing any of the members or employees of The Oklahoma County Election Board of fraud. However, we know that it is possible for these voting machines to be accessed by outside malevolent actors intent on depriving Oklahomans of a fair and honest election. It is our hope through this report to state our case for a hand recount of all absentee votes in the counties in question, especially in light of upcoming City Council races. If even one vote was flipped it represents a criminal infringement on our most sacred of rights.

Presidential

We begin our analysis with the last three presidential votes. In 2012, then-Senator Romney beat out President Obama in absentee votes by nearly a 2-1 margin:

Presidential	Absentee Mail	Early Voting	Election Day	Total Votes	Percentage
Obama	5,297	9,711	91,974	106,982	41.67%
Romney	10,930	4,153	134,645	149,728	58.33%
Total	16,227	13,864	226,619	256,710

A similar pattern emerged in 2016, with President Trump beating Hillary Clinton by almost 2,000 absentee votes:

Presidential	Absentee Mail	Early Voting	Election Day	Total Votes	Percentage
Trump/Pence	6,790	7,530	48,218	62,538	57.14%
Johnson/Weld	709	715	6,659	8,083	7.39%
Clinton/Kaine	4,645	5,501	28,683	38,829	35.48%
Total	12,144	13,746	83,560	109,450

Yet in 2020, the trends completely change, with Biden outpacing Hillary and Obama by almost 50K votes, despite never setting foot in the state:

Presidential	Absentee Mail	Early Voting	Election Day	Total Votes	Percentage
Trump/Pence	29,408	6,024	109,618	145,050	49.21%
Jorgensen/Cohen	1,400	158	3,714	5,272	1.79%
Biden/Harris	55,118	9,860	76,746	141,724	48.08%
Simmons/Roze	256	20	576	852	0.29%
West/Tidball	257	30	1,039	1,326	0.45%
Pierce/Ballard	162	7	347	516	0.18%
Total	86,601	16,099	192,040	294,740

By comparison, in 2016 Trump outpaced Hillary by nearly 20% of the absentee vote:

Percentage	Absentee	Early Voting	Election Day	Total
Trump/Pence	55.43%	42.76%	51.97%	51.68%
Clinton/Kaine	38.19%	52.92%	40.52%	41.18%

Yet in 2020, Trump trailed Biden by almost 30%:

Percentage	Absentee	Early Voting	Election Day
Trump/Pence	33.96%	37.42%	57.08%
Jorgensen/Cohen	1.62%	0.98%	1.93%
Biden/Harris	63.65%	61.25%	39.96%
Simmons/Roze	0.30%	0.12%	0.30%
West/Tidball	0.30%	0.19%	0.54%
Pierce/Ballard	0.19%	0.04%	0.18%

In order to determine the full possible impact, we compared the vote totals that Trump and Biden reportedly received with the totals they would have received (at a minimum) if they received the same percentage of votes as the main candidates got in 2016:

Party	Actual	Proposed*	Difference	% Change
Trump/Pence	29,408	46,855	17,447	24.42%
Biden/Harris	55,118	32,279	22,839	-24.42%
Total	84,526	79,134	40,285

As you can see, there was a minimum +40,000 vote flip from historical norms for a candidate who never campaigned once in the Sooner State over a President who made his first campaign stop after the COVID stoppage here in Oklahoma, and enjoys huge popularity among Oklahomans. As a result of this flip, President Trump won Oklahoma County by less than 4,000 votes.

U.S. Senate Race

The trends continue in the race for U.S. Senate. In 2016, Senator Lankford easily outpaced his Democrat challenger by more than a 2-1 margin in absentee votes:

Candidate	Absentee	Early Voting	Election Day	TOTAL
James Lankford (Rep)	20,469	9,955	130,067	160,491
Mike Workman (Dem)	9,163	9,110	70,949	89,222
Total	29,632	19,065	201,016	249,713

However, this year first-time political challenger Abby Broyles nearly reversed that ratio on long-time Senate stalwart Jim Inhofe:

That represents a nearly complete flip of percentages in absentee voting:

2016:

Percentage	Absentee	Early Voting	Election Day	TOTAL
Lankford	69.08%	52.22%	64.70%	64.27%
Workman	30.92%	47.78%	35.30%	35.73%

2020:

Percentage	Absentee	Early Voting	Election Day	TOTAL
Inhofe	34.86%	37.36%	55.28%	48.29%
Broyles	62.28%	60.25%	39.63%	47.43%

Following the same methodology as the presidential analysis, this represents a swap of greater than 55,000 votes over historical trends:

Proposed 2020 Vote Totals based on Historical Norms – US Senate (Absentee)
Party	Actual	Proposed*	Difference	% Change
Inhofe	30,207	58,148	27,941	33.19%
Broyles	53,971	26,030	27,941	-33.19%
Total	84,178	84,178	55,882

U.S. House (CD5)

Similar trends are found in the hotly-contested House District 5 race between Stephanie Bice and Kendra Horn. While Horn outperformed Steve Russell in absentee in her 2018 victory by about 2,000 votes, her lead soared to nearly 22,000 votes over Stephanie Bice in 2020 despite a strong, concerted effort to oust her by the OKGOP:

2018:

Candidate	Absentee	Early Voting	Election Day	TOTAL	Percentage
Steve Russell (Rep_)	9,772	5,994	85,059	100,825	47.66%
Kendra Horn (Dem)	11,326	9,053	90,348	110,727	52.34%
Total	21,098	15,047	175,407	211,552

2020:

Candidate	Absentee	Early Voting	Election Day	TOTAL
Stephanie Bice (Rep)	28,374	5,807	98,436	132,617
Kendra Horn (Dem)	52,279	9,233	73,466	134,978
Total	80,653	15,040	171,902	267,595

While holding to historical averages would have still had Horn winning the absentee vote, it is not nearly as much as what was reported:

Party	Actual	Proposed*	Difference	% Change
Bice	28,374	37,356	8,982	11.14%
Horn	52,279	43,297	8,982	-11.14%
Total	80,653	80,653	17,964

Oklahoma County Clerk

The anomalies even continued to down-ballot local races. In 2016, David Hooten easily beat Chris Powell in absentee votes by a margin similar to James Lankford’s win over Mike Workman:

In 2020, the margins completely flip:

This represents a flip of over 52,000 votes from the historical norm:

Party	Actual	Proposed*	Difference	% Change
Hooten	35,696	61,857	26,161	30.87%
Chicoraske	49,062	22,901	26,161	-30.87%
Total	84,758	84,758	52,322

Oklahoma County Court Clerk

Even the Oklahoma County Court Clerk’s race saw irregularities. in 2016 Rick Warren easily defeated Anastasia Pittman in absentee votes by a comfortable margin:

Candidate	Absentee	Early Voting	Election Day	TOTAL
Rick Warren (Rep)	19,286	9,368	123,725	152,379
Anastasia Pittman (Dem)	11,596	10,795	94,290	116,681
Total	30,882	20,163	218,015	269,060

In 2020, the reversal trend continued:

Candidate	Absentee	Early Voting	Election Day	TOTAL
Rick Warren (Rep)	37,540	6,768	119,978	164,286
Charles De Coune (Dem)	47,334	9,138	68,737	125,209
Total	84,874	15,906	188,715	289,495

This represents a +30,000 vote flip:

Party	Actual	Proposed*	Difference	% Change
Warren	37,540	53,004	15,464	18.22%
De Coune	47,334	31,870	15,464	-18.22%
Total	84,874	84,874	30,929

Oklahoma County Sheriff

Lastly, the trend even continues down to the County Sheriff races. In 2016, The Oklahoma County Sheriff’s race was nearly a dead-heat in absentee voting:

Candidate	Absentee	Early Voting	Election Day	TOTAL
Mike Christian (Rep)	15,338	8,301	106,559	130,198
John Whetsel (Dem)	15,653	11,832	112,687	140,172
Total	30,991	20,133	219,246	270,370

This year the absentee vote was not even remotely close, with Democrat Wayland Cubit winning by nearly 16,000 votes:

Candidate	Absentee	Early Voting	Election Day	TOTAL
Tommie Johnson III (Rep)	34,971	6,374	112,277	153,622
Wayland Cubit (Dem)	50,468	9,587	77,216	137,271
Total	85,439	15,961	189,493	290,893

Because of the closeness of the 2016 race, the vote flip from historical norms is smaller, but still significant:

Party	Actual	Proposed*	Difference	% Change
Tommie Johnson III.	34,971	42,285	7,314	8.56%
Wayland Cubit	50,468	43,154	7,314	-8.56%
Total	85,439	85,439	14,629

Voter Registration Changes

While one could understand a targeted flip of presidential votes, and even senatorial or congressional votes, the potential flipping of down-ballot local races either represents systemic, egregious fraud; a massive swing of independent voters toward the Democrat party; or a massive surge of staunchly Democrat voters in a county that has been solidly Republican for years. To determine the likelihood of the latter two scenarios, we compared the change in registered voters from 2016-2020, and 2019-2020. If these numbers are legitimate, and there really was a surge of Democrat votes, it would be highly likely to see a surge in registered Democrat voters (considering most Independents would likely be split evenly). The numbers, however, don’t show that.

From 2016-2020, the number show a small, yet proportional change in voter registration:

Oklahoma County Voter Registration 2016-2020
Party	1-Nov-16	1-Nov-20	Difference
Republican	184,264	189,991	5,727
Democrat	161,257	164,628	3,371
Libertarian	901	3,385	2,484
Independent	70,029	83,799	13,770
TOTAL	416,451	441,803	25,352

From 2016 to 2019, there seems to have been a drop in overall registered voters, likely due to death, relocation, or graduation of college students. So the 2019-2020 change in registered voters, while larger than from 2016-2020, does show an overall increase of registered Democrat voters over Republican voters, but not by much:

Oklahoma County Voter Registration 2019-2020
Party	15-Jan-20	1-Nov-20	Difference
Republican	178,023	189,991	11,968
Democrat	151,337	164,628	13,291
Libertarian	2,650	3,385	735
Independent	75,037	83,799	8,762
TOTAL	407,047	441,803	34,756

Now compare those numbers with the difference in voter turnouts from 2016-2020, and you’ll notice a HEAVY swing towards Democrat votes in absentee voting:

Oklahoma County Presidential Voter Turnout Difference: 2016 v 2020
Party	Absentee	Early Voting	Election Day	Total Votes
Republican	12,020	-2,728	-5,811	3,481
Democrat	43,139	-973	-13,255	28,911
TOTAL	55,159	-3,701	-19,066	32,392

While some of the surge of Democrat absentee voting could be explained by the drop in Election Day voting due to COVID-19 concerns, that only accounts for 30% of the total increase in absentee Democrat voters.

When comparing the voting registrations to the overall voting trends, it gets even more alarming. While the Republicans added 11,968 new registered voters from 2019-2020, they only acquired 3,481 more votes than 2016; a 8,487 vote gap. Considering the overall enthusiasm for President Trump among Republicans, with some reports even showing a staggering 96% voting rate for the President among his own party, it is highly unlikely that he would lose 70% of the new registered Republicans votes.

Meanwhile, the Democrats only added 13,291 new voters, but added 28,911 new votes; a 15,620 vote gain, a 207% increase. Combine the lost Republican votes and the gain Democrat votes, and that represents a shift of 24,107 votes.

Even if you compare the 2016-2020 change in voter registrations to 2016-2020 voter turnout, the numbers look even more suspicious. The Republicans gained 5,727 voters, yet only picked up 3,481 new votes, a 60% conversion rate for a President that converted 96% Republican votes throughout the country. The Democrats, however, picked up only 3,371 new voters, but gained 28,911 new votes, an 857% increase…in the middle of a state that awarded all 77 counties to President Trump in 2016.

Conclusion

As we said above, we are NOT alleging fraud by the Oklahoma County Election Board. If at any time the counting machines were connected to the internet, even if it was just to upload the results to the server, it would have given outside hackers enough time to change the votes at the point of transfer, which is exactly what happened in the 6 states whose elections are in question. If even one vote was switched, it’s one vote too many.

The only way of ensuring our elections are secure is for our elected officials to demand a hand recount of all absentee ballots in Oklahoma County. If the numbers turn out to be the same as reported on election night, then we know our elections are secure (and that Republicans have a LOT of work to do before 2022). However, if we find that votes were indeed switched, even if it doesn’t change the results, then we must demand that ALL voting machines in the State of Oklahoma be immediately decommissioned and the Governor, legislature, and Oklahoma City Council take the steps necessary to protect our elections moving forward…starting with the City Council elections.

(Consequently, this represents a golden opportunity for enterprising patriots to create secure, American-made, American-owned voting machines.)

Oklahomans built this land with blood, sweat, and tears. We would be more than happy to help secure our liberty by volunteering to hand-count ballots in the meantime. The safety and security of our great state, and our Republic, demand nothing less.

COPYRIGHT © 2020 · IGNITE LIBERTY

 

As mentioned in our previous email, Ignite Liberty is proud to announce that Cody Brewer, OU Law – ’18 (MLS), has joined our staff as a legal analyst. We have asked him to provide his constitutional expertise to analyzing the Kraken cases filed in GA and MI this week. Below is his analysis of the Georgia case:

On November 25, 2020, Attorney Sidney Powell (Powell) filed a lawsuit on behalf of several Republican Electors as Plaintiffs (P) from the State of Georgia and is before in the Northern District Of Georgia, Atlanta Division, against Brian Kemp, in his official capacity as Governor of Georgia, Brad Raffensperger, in his official capacity as Secretary of State and Chair of the Georgia State Election Board, David J. Worley, in his official capacity as a member of the Georgia State Election Board, Rebecca N. Sullivan, in her official capacity as a member of the Georgia State Election Board, Matthew Mashburn, in his official capacity as a member of the Georgia State Election Board, and Anh Le, in her official capacity as a member of the Georgia State Election Board as Defendants (D).

According to the Complaint, Powell states, “This civil action brings to light a massive election fraud, multiple violations of Georgia laws and multiple Constitutional violations, as shown by fact witnesses to specific incidents, multiple expert witnesses and the sheer mathematical impossibilities found in the Georgia 2020 General Election.”

Before we get into the heart of the complaint, it’s important to note that civil cases are different than criminal cases in what it takes to win. As Ms. Powell points out in her brief,“As a civil action, the plaintiff’s burden of proof is a “preponderance of the evidence” (more than a 50% probability of being true) to show, as the Georgia Supreme Court has made clear that, “[i] was not incumbent upon [Plaintiff] to show how the voters would have voted if their [absentee] ballots had been regular. [Plaintiff] only had to show that there were enough irregular ballots to place in doubt the result.”

Background

Due to the SARS-COV-2 virus and disease known as COVID, the Democrat Party and Main Stream Media outlets across the country, especially in Democrat strongholds like Detroit, Atlanta, Philadelphia, Pittsburg and Milwaukee, used COVID and “social distancing” as an excuse and turned a blind eye to the procedures, laws, and statutes that exist to safeguard the Presidential election. Unlike the Absentee ballot which most were familiar with up until 2020, the Mail-in ballot did not require the same strict procedures.

This opened the door to massive fraud across the country, including ballot harvesting, stolen ballots from mailboxes, voters selling their ballots for money, etc. In Pennsylvania alone, there is proof that the State mailed out 1.5 million ballots and received close to 2.3 million ballots! This net gain of nearly 800k ballots, regardless of who the ballots were for, casts doubt on the entire election. So much doubt that it will be nearly impossible to certify ANY state, yet the State of Pennsylvania did just that. However, we fully expect that to end up in the Pennsylvania Supreme Court as well.

Leading up to the Presidential Election on November 3, 2020 there was a strong dissent growing amongst voters in multiple states along with leadership in the Republican Party over the legality and Constitutionality of Mail-in ballots.Media outlets around the country were putting out false claims that the Mail-in ballot and the Absentee ballot were the same thing and encouraged millions to fill out their application for the Mail-in ballots. However, this could not be further from the truth.

Traditionally, the Absentee ballots are utilized by members of the military serving overseas, Physically Incapacitated, or a person who may have two homes in different states, and living outside the state in which they are registered to vote. In this case, one would have to fill out the application, show their ID, as proof they are who they say they are, and sign an affidavit to validate their identity under penalty of perjury. In Oklahoma, Title 26 of the Oklahoma Statutes provides that any person who knowingly executes a false application for an absentee ballot shall be deemed guilty of a felony. https://www.ok.gov/elections/Voter_Info/Absentee_Voting/.

Oklahoma voting law allows anyone to request an Absentee ballot, but according to the laws on the books, a “reason” must be listed for Absentee ballots, while Georgia law authorizes “any eligible voter to cast his or her absentee ballot by mail without providing a reason. O.C.G.A. § 21-2-380(b).

Now that you have a little background on general application of law pertaining to most states like Oklahoma, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, these actions taken by many Democrat-majority jurisdictions regarding mail-in ballots vs the absentee ballots, border on Treason and Sedition as outlined in 18 US Code Chapter 115. If you wish to look these up individually you can find them here: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/part-I/chapter-115. In this report, although Powell listed at least five counts in her complaint, we will give a generalized summary to these counts listed in the complaint which cover Illegal Procedures, Insecure Voting Machines, Illegal ballots, and 14^th Amendment Due process violations.

Illegal Procedures

Allegations of fraud in this complaint point out irregularities in chain of custody and full accountability of ballots, baffling vote counting pauses throughout the night of the election, and Poll watchers being threatened and removed by Democrat controlled polling stations as seen on many videos posted on Youtube when Democrats were cheering each time a Republican Poll watcher was removed.

One source who worked at a polling station claims that “in a normal election process they receive the voting machines, and the ballot counting devices the Friday before the election, and a Chain of Custody letter to be signed by Sunday confirming the voting machine count and that the machines have been sealed. This time, however,, in the Milton Precinct, the machines did not show up until 2am on the day of the election and yet the polling station was asked to sign the Chain of Custody letter Sunday.” The polling official went on to say, “this is unacceptable and voting machines should not be out of custody prior to election day.”

In other Democrat-majority counties Republican Poll watchers were illegally prevented from watching vote counting. The Democrat led polling stations provided political parties and candidates, including Trump campaign officials “no meaningful access or actual opportunity to review and assess the validity of the mail in ballots.” While in the audit or recount witnesses claim they saw “Trump ballots being put into Biden piles” and go on to claim that there was no way to tell it the activity was proper or if the count was accurate.”

Additionally, a large number of ballots were identical and likely fraudulent. According to one of the affidavits:

“she observed a batch of utterly pristine ballots:  most of the ballots had already been handled; they had been written on by people, and the edges were worn. They showed obvious use. However, one batch stood out. It was pristine. There was a difference in the texture of the paper – it was if they were intended for absentee use but had not been used for that purposes. There was a difference in the feel. These different ballots included a slight depressed pre-fold so they could be easily folded and unfolded for use in the scanning machines.

There were no markings on the ballots to show where they had come from, or where they had been processed. These stood out. In my 20 years of experience of handling ballots, I observed that the markings for the candidates on these ballots were unusually uniform, perhaps even with a ballot-marking device. By my estimate in observing these ballots, approximately 98% constituted votes for Joe Biden. I only observed two of these ballots as votes for President Donald J. Trump.”

Insecure Voting Machines and Dominion Software

What is Dominion? How are Georgia voting machines not secure? When one decides to go down this rabbit hole, you find yourself scratching your head as to HOW this could happen in the United States. This only happens in communist countries like Venezuela. Let’s get back to that in a moment, but remember Venezuela.

Dominion is a Canadian owned company whose owners and affiliates read like a veritable Who’s Who of DC Swamp Creatures. Dominion was acquired on July 16, 2008 by its management team and Staple Street Capital. According to Gnews.org, Staple Street Capital is a private equity firm founded in 2009 based in New York. The co-founders Stephen D. Owens and Hootan Yaghoobzadeh, both are veterans of The Carlyle Group and Cerberus Capital Management,are also the Board members of Dominion Voting. Stephen D. Owens was a managing director of the Carlyle Group (1998 – 2009), when Hootan Yaghoobzadeh worked for the Carlyle Group (2002 – 2003) and Cerberus Capital Management (2003 – 2009).

William E. Kennard is also an Executive Board Member of Staple Street Capital, also worked for The Carlyle Group. Gnews.org claims that “Kennard was nominated as ambassador to the EU by Barack Obama in August 2009 and is a member of Secretary of State John Kerry’s Foreign Affairs Policy Board. He was a key force behind Obama’s decision in February 2013 to launch negotiations on the ambitious Transatlantic Trade. He was also chairman of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission after being appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1997. Before nominated as ambassador to the EU by Barack Obama in 2009, Kennard was managing director of the Carlyle Group (2001-2009) where he led investments in the telecommunications and media sectors.”

The Carlyle Group isn’t much better, with known connections to Barack Obama, James Baker, Bush family, John Kerry, former UK Prime Minister; Fidel Ramos, former Philippines President; Park Tae Joon, former South Korean Prime Minister; Saudi Prince Al-Walid; Colin Powell, former Secretary of State; James Baker III, former Secretary of State; Caspar Weinberger, former Defense Secretary; Richard Darman, former White House Budget Director; the billionaire George Soros, and members of the Bin Laden family. You can add Alice Albright, daughter of Madeleine Albright, former Secretary of State; Arthur Lewitt, former SEC head; William Kennard, former head of the FCC, to this list as well.

It just so happens some of these names are the same names that keep popping up in the fraudulent Russian Collusion hoax investigation that Robert Mueller spent nearly $40 million on investigating President Trump and found nothing, the fake impeachment of President Trump, and the Ukrainian phone call they used to go after the President, all of which Trump was found not guilty. Moreover, many of these people are tied to numerous government agencies, Corporations, and private firms that President Trump has been fighting since he won election in 2016.

Now, back to Dominion Software, the Canadian owned company. In the United States, there are over 28 states that use this software. However, it doesn’t stop there. In the complaint, Powell states that:

“the massive fraud begins with the election software and hardware from Dominion Voting Systems Corporation (“Dominion”) only recently purchased and rushed into use by Defendants Governor Brian Kemp, Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, and the Georgia Board of Elections. Sequoia voting machines were used in 16 states and the District of Colombia in 2006. Smartmatic, which has revenue of about $100 million, focuses on Venezuela and other markets outside the U.S.

After selling Sequoia, Smartmatic’s chief executive, Anthony Mugica. Mr. Mugica said, he hoped Smartmatic would work with Sequoia on projects in the U.S., though Smartmatic wouldn’t take an equity stake.” Smartmatic and Dominion were founded by foreign oligarchs and dictators to ensure computerized ballot-stuffing and vote manipulation to whatever level was needed to make certain Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez never lost another election. (See Redacted whistleblower affiant, attached as Exh. 2) Notably, Chavez “won” every election thereafter.”

There is mounting evidence that points to Dominion and Smartmatic algorithms being used to manipulate voting machine results without anyone being able to audit or trace the results. As one affiant explains:

“Chavez was most insistent that Smartmatic design the system in away that the system could change the vote of each voter without being detected. He wanted the software itself to function in such a manner that if the voter were to place their thumb print or fingerprint on a scanner, then the thumbprint would be tied to a record of the voter’s name and identity as having voted, but that voter would not be tracked to the changed vote.

He made it clear that the system would have to be setup to not leave any evidence of the changed vote for a specific voter and that there would be no evidence to show and nothing to contradict that the name or the fingerprint or thumb print was going with a changed vote. Smartmatic agreed to create such a system and produced the software and hardware that accomplished that result for President Chavez.”

Reading this complaint, one of the most shocking statements made is that Defendants Governor Kemp and Secretary of State Raffensperger “disregarded all the concerns that caused Dominion software to be rejected by the Texas Board of Elections in 2018, namely that it was vulnerable to undetected and non-auditable manipulation.” This is extremely important because in my opinion it goes to intent. Why would you allow a software that is vulnerable and open to outside manipulation into your state? Why did EVERY battleground state for that matter, allow this software when these problems were already known?

An industry expert, Dr. Andrew Appel, Princeton Professor of Computer Science and Election Security Expert has recently observed, with reference to Dominion Voting machines: “I figured out how to make a slightly different computer program that just before the polls were closed, it switches some votes around from one candidate to another. I wrote that computer program into a memory chip and now to hack a voting machine you just need 7 minutes alone with it and a screwdriver.” The fact that the Defendants knew in advance that other states like Texas refused to award Dominion with a contract due to the overwhelming evidence of fraud and manipulation is direct proof that their intent for this election was less than honorable intentions.

Illegal Ballots

“On March 6, 2020, the DPG, DSCC, DCCC, SOS Raffensperger, and the Members of the Georgia State Election Board executed—and filed on the public docket—a “Compromise Settlement Agreement and Release” (Settlement Agreement). As part of the Settlement Agreement, Raffensperger agreed to issue an Official Election Bulletin containing certain procedures for the review of signatures on absentee ballot envelopes by county election officials for the March 24, 2020 Presidential Primary Election and subsequent General Election. In relevant part, the procedures stated:

When reviewing an elector’s signature on the mail-in absentee ballot envelope, the registrar or clerk must compare the signature on the mail-in absentee ballot envelope to each signature contained in such elector’s voter registration record in eNet and the elector’s signature on the application for the mail-in absentee ballot. If the registrar or absentee ballot clerk determines that the voter’s signature on the mail-in absentee ballot envelope does not match any of the voter’s signatures on file in eNet or on the absentee ballot application, the registrar or absentee ballot clerk must seek review from two other registrars, deputy registrars, or absentee ballot clerks.

A mail in absentee ballot shall not be rejected unless a majority of the registrars, deputy registrars, or absentee ballot clerks reviewing the signature agree that the signature does not match any of the voter’s signatures on file in eNet or on the absentee ballot application. If a determination is made that the elector’s signature on the mail-in absentee ballot envelope does not match any of the voter’s signatures on file in eNet or on the absentee ballot application, the registrar or absentee ballot clerk shall write the names of the three elections officials who conducted the signature review across the face of the absentee ballot envelope, which shall be in addition to writing “Rejected” and the reason for the rejection as required under OCGA 21-2-386(a)(1)(C).

Practices that promote the casting of illegal or unreliable ballots or fail to contain basic minimum guarantees against such conduct, can violate the Fourteenth Amendment by leading to the dilution of validly cast ballots. Under Georgia state law, Legislature instructed the county registrars and clerks to handle the absentee ballots as directed therein. The Georgia Legislature set forth the procedures to be used by each municipality for appointing the absentee ballot clerks to ensure that such clerks would “perform the duties set forth in this Article.”

The Georgia Election Code instructs those who handle absentee ballots to follow a clear procedure:

“Upon receipt of each [absentee] ballot, a registrar or clerk shall write the day and hour of the receipt of the ballot on its envelope. The registrar or clerk shall then compare the identifying information on the oath with the information on file in his or her office, shall compare the signature or make on the oath with the signature or mark on the absentee elector’s voter card or the most recent update to such absentee elector’s voter registration card and application for absentee ballot or a facsimile of said signature or maker taken from said card or application, and shall, if the information and signature appear to be valid and other identifying information appears to be correct, so certify by signing or initialing his or her name below the  voter’s oath. Each elector’s name so certified shall be listed by the registrar or clerk on the numbered list of absentee voters prepared for his or her precinct.”

The Election Code goes on to state, If the elector has failed to sign the oath, or if the signature does not appear to be valid, or if the elector has failed to furnish required information or information so furnished does not conform with that on file in the registrar’s or clerk’s office, or if the elector is otherwise found disqualified to vote, the registrar or clerk shall write across the face of the envelope “Rejected,” giving the reason therefor. The board of registrars or absentee ballot clerk shall promptly notify the elector of such rejection, a copy of which notification shall be retained in the files of the board of registrars or absentee ballot clerk for at least one year. It is clear that the Democrat-majority counties performed no signature verification, paving the way for massive voter fraud and illegal vote dumps for Biden.

According to the complaint, on March 6, 2020, the Secretary of State of the State of Georgia, Secretary Raffensperger, and the State Election Board, who administer the state elections entered into a “Compromise and Settlement Agreement and Release” (the “Litigation Settlement”) with the Democratic Party of Georgia, Inc., the Democrat Senatorial Campaign Committee, and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (collectively, the “Democrat Party Agencies”), setting forth different standards to be followed by the clerks and registrars in processing absentee ballots in the State of Georgia.

Under the Settlement, however, the Administrators agreed to change the statutorily prescribed manner of handling absentee ballots in a manner that is not consistent with the laws promulgated by the Georgia Legislature for elections in this state. The Settlement also changed the signature requirement reducing it to a broad process with discretion, rather than enforcement of the signature requirement as statutorily required under O.C.G.A. 21-2-386(a)(l). Thus,paving the way for massive voter fraud since these mail-in ballots did not have to match signatures to the envelopes received.

This Settlement agreement violates both the Electors Clause and Elections Clause in Article II of the U.S. Constitution, as the parties involved in this agreement did not have the Constitutional authority to override the State legislature’s authority to set the “times, manners, and places for the choosing of electors.” This aspect of Ms. Powell’s complaint is similar in argument to the Trump Campaign’s suit in Pennsylvania.

The Smartest Man in the Room

In the recent hours following Powell’s complaint filing, it has been reported that Navid Keshavarz-Nia, an expert witness who stated under oath that there was massive computer fraud in the 2020 election, has joined Powell and submitted a declaration to the complaint. As you will see, his declarations prove what Ignite Liberty reported shortly after the election regarding the nature of the attempted steal.

Mr. Keshavarz-Nia’s qualifications are remarkably extensive. According to his declaration, they took seven pages to list. Among those qualifications listed are the following: “a B.A., M.A., and Ph.D. in various areas of electrical and computer engineering.  In addition, “I have advanced trained from the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), National Security Agency (NSA), DHS office of Intelligence & Analysis (I&A) and Massachusetts Institution of Technology (MIT).”

Dr. Kershavarz-Nia has spent his career as a cyber-security engineer.  “My experience,” he attests,” spans 35 years performing technical assessment, mathematical modeling, cyber-attack pattern analysis, and security intelligence[.]” In other words, he may be one of, if not the most qualified cyber-security experts in the country. In his declaration, Dr. Kershavarz-Nia stated the following:

1. Hammer and Scorecard is real, not a hoax (as Democrats allege), and both are used to manipulate election outcomes.
2. Dominion, ES&S, Scytl, and Smartmatic are all vulnerable to fraud and vote manipulation — and the mainstream media reported on these vulnerabilities in the past.
3. Dominion has been used in other countries to “forge election results.”
4. Dominion’s corporate structure is deliberately confusing to hide relationships with Venezuela, China, and Cuba.
5. Dominion machines are easily hackable.
6. Dominion memory cards with cryptographic key access to the systems were stolen in 2019.

His declaration can be found here: https://www.scribd.com/document/486105599/Affidavit-of-Dr-Navid-Keshavarz-Nia-Phd#fullscreen&from_embed

In summary

There are massive allegations listed in Powell’s complaint and if proven we are not only looking at Constitutional violations, and ballot fraud, we are looking at Treason and Sedition against the United States, and even a Coup against a sitting President. It is clear that the Plaintiffs in the aforementioned complaint have no adequate remedy at law and will suffer serious and irreparable harm unless the injunctive relief requested herein is granted.

Powell’s complaint calls for the following relief:

1. An order directing Governor Kemp, Secretary Raffensperger and the Georgia State Board of Elections to de-certify the election results;
2. An order enjoining Governor Kemp from transmitting the currently certified election results to the Electoral College;
3. An order requiring Governor Kemp to transmit certified election results that state that President Donald Trump is the winner of the election;
4. An immediate order to impound all the voting machines and software in Georgia for expert inspection by the Plaintiffs.
5. An order that no votes received or tabulated by machines that were not certified as required by federal and state law be counted.
6. A declaratory judgment declaring that Georgia Secretary of State Rule 183-1-14-0.9-.15 violates the Electors and Elections Clause, U.S. CONST. art. I, § 4;
7. A declaratory judgment declaring that Georgia’s failed system of signature verification violates the Electors and Elections Clause by working a de facto abolition of the signature       verification requirement;
8. A declaratory judgment declaring that current certified election results violates the Due Process Clause, U.S. CONST. Amend. XIV;
9. A declaratory judgment declaring that mail-in and absentee ballot fraud must be remedied with a Full Manual Recount or statistically valid sampling that properly verifies the signatures on            absentee ballot envelopes and that invalidates the certified results if the recount or sampling             analysis shows a sufficient number of ineligible absentee ballots were counted;
10. An emergency declaratory judgment that voting machines be Seized and Impounded immediately for a forensic audit—by plaintiffs’ expects;
11. A declaratory judgment declaring absentee ballot fraud occurred in violation of Constitutional rights, Election laws and under state law;
12. A permanent injunction prohibiting the Governor and Secretary of State from transmitting the currently certified results to the Electoral College based on the overwhelming evidence of election tampering;
13. Immediate production of 36 hours of security camera recording of all rooms used in the voting process at State Farm Arena in Fulton County, GA from 12:00 AM to 3:00 AM until 6:00            PM on November 3.
14. Plaintiffs further request the Court grant such other relief as is just and proper, including but not limited to, the costs of this action and their reasonable attorney fees and expenses pursuant to 42U.S.C. 1988.

The results of the election are riddled with Constitutional violations both State and Federal. It is also clear that there is no clear remedy at the State level and the results from each State that used Dominion software which as of now is more than 28, should be set aside.

Furthermore, how as American citizens can we accept ANY result from a National election when Canada, Venezuela,and China, all had their hands on the 2020 Presidential election in some way, including the ballot results being sent to foreign servers in Germany and Spain. As of now, there is no action by the Supreme Court to set aside the 50 state election results. However, the more individual states uncover fraud and violations of state election laws, we can definitely see things trending in that direction.

I truly believe the only remedy that exists is for the Supreme Court to set aside all 50 State elections and per the United States Constitution Article 2 Section 1 of the Twelfth Amendment where the House of Representatives shall choose the President and each State’s delegation getting one vote, and the Senate choosing the Vice-President. As of today, there are 31 Republican states and 19 Democrat states which will favor Trump to win the 2020 Presidential election. We all are waiting to see what becomes of this Complaint and to see if those responsible for this massive fraud will be brought to justice.

(**Note-As this article is being written a major win for the GOP was announced in Pennsylvania. PA State Judge upholds halt to Certification, and finds likelihood Mail-in balloting procedures violate the PA Constitution. Link here: https://legalinsurrection.com/2020/11/pennsylvania-state-judge-halts-certification-finds-likelihood-mail-in-balloting-procedures-violate-pa-constitution/)

“Equity will not suffer a wrong to be without a remedy.”

Cody A Brewer, MLS

Contributor, Legal Analyst

COPYRIGHT © 2020 · IGNITE LIBERTY

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sidney Powell has exposed that, in 2015, a CIA whistleblower by the name of Dennis Montgomery came forward and revealed that a top-secret SIGINT (Signal Intelligence) program known as THE HAMMER had be stolen by then-CIA chief John Brennan and moved to a CIA black site at Ft. Washington, MD for the purpose of turning it on the American people. Brennan also put a secure VPN in the Obama Whitehouse that would allow the Obama Administration to spy on their “enemies” with impunity. Mr. Montgomery knew this because he was the DOD Civil Service employee who created the program in 2003 to help provide protection for our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.  

Side note: this author benefitted greatly from THE HAMMER during his deployment to Iraq from 2007-2009. THE HAMMER was used to guide patrols to safe routes within the cities of Iraq by using the intelligence gathered to determine which routes had been compromised with IEDs or EFPs (Explosively Formed Penetrators – an especially deadly type of IED imported into Iraq from Iran).  

When Mr. Montgomery came forward, he turned over 47 hard drives of information to the FBI, which included the evidence of all of this, plus over 10,000 pages of Hunter Biden’s mis–dealings in China and Ukraine. Unfortunately, upon Montgomery’s revelation the Director of National Intelligence John Negroponte chose to cover up the scandal by invoking States Secrets Privilege and Governor Protective Order.  

However, Carlotta Wells with DOJ informed Montgomery that both States Secrets and Governor Protective Orders, “cannot be invoked by government officials for the purpose of covering up government malfeasance.”1 Under those conditions, any such orders would be null and void. At that point, Montgomery chose to break the story to investigative journalist Mary Fanning.  

What he revealed was that the Obama Administration had used THE HAMMER to spy on, among other, 140+ Article III Judges, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Robert, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, members of Christian churches and Jewish synagogues, and Donald Trump (beginning in 2010).  

Mr. Montgomery also revealed that THE HAMMER had on it an application known as SCORECARD. SCORECARD was an algorithm that allowed for a user to switch up to 3% of the votes in an election to favor the candidate that they wanted to win. LTG McInerney revealed that SCORECARD had been used in both the 2012 Presidential Election to flip the State of Florida to Obama. It had also been used nationally in the 2016 to attempt to secure the election for Hillary Clinton, however according to LTG McInerney’s interview with Steve Bannon “something happened and it didn’t work. I can’t say anything more about that.”  

On November 1st, Mary Fanning notified Sidney Powell and LTG McInerney that SCORECARD was going to be used by the Democrats in this election to secure a Biden victory, though the Trump administration likely already knew that well in advance. 

At the same time this was being revealed nationwide, Dr. Steve Pieczenik, a former Assistant Secretary of State to Presidents Nixon, Ford, and Carter, and a senior policy advisor to President Reagan, revealed to Infowars Owen Shroyer that the election had not been “stolen” but rather this was the culmination of a years-long sting operation put in place by President Trump to end the Democrat Voter Fraud Machine once and for all. He also revealed that President Trump had the official paper ballots watermarked with invisible ink and traceable serial numbers using the same technology that the Quantum Financial System (QFS) was based off of.  

When Ignite Liberty investigated these claims, we found that in 2018 President Trump had indeed declared elections a national security issue, and created a new Federal law enforcement agency within the Department of Homeland Security called the Counterintelligence and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) whose primary responsibility would be ensuring the integrity of our elections. Among the measures CISA initiated to accomplish their mission was the use of invisible watermarks on the official paper used in ballots across the country. The document below was found on the official CISA government website. Notice the last line:   

Also of note is that in 2018 President Trump had created the White House National Quantum Coordination Office in order to harness the incredible power of quantum information science in order to unleash its “incredible potential for U.S. economic growth, technological advancement, and national security.”2  Additionally, there are multiple reports that the QFS has already been activated via 56 satellites that were launched and defended by the new U.S. Space Force (which sheds light on President Trump’s motives for creating the new Armed Forces branch).  

 

Since publishing  this information in our last newsletter as a “theory”, multiple deeply-connected official sources have confirmed to Ignite Liberty the authenticity of our reports. This election has not been stolen. It is indeed the culmination of a multi-year sting operation that President Trump put in place not just to end the Democrat voter fraud machine, but also help reset the world’s currency from a fiat-based currency to one based off of gold and silver – something Trump insiders know he hinted at before he was even elected – by creating the Quantum Financial System. Ignite Liberty will address the QFS, its benefits, and what the transition will look like in a separate newsletter, but if you want a brief primer, click here: 

https://dinartimes.com/a-new-financial-system-aka-the-quantum-financial-system-qfs/ 

What Has Happened Since

As mentioned above, huge developments have taken place since the last newsletter that has both confirmed our theory and deepened our understanding of exactly what happened. We won’t go over EVERYTHING that has happened. In particular, we’re not going to outline the numerous lawsuits here primarily because almost all of these lawsuits have not been filed by the Trump Campaign. They’ve been filed by individual citizens un Equal Protection laws.  

The first Trump Campaign lawsuit was just filed yesterday in Georgia by attorney L. Lin Wood to prevent the certification of the Georgia vote. Until we see how the main lawsuits are going to play out, and have a chance to review the filings, we will not comment on those.  

That being said, we will highlight two critical developments over the last 10 days that we feel will make a huge impact in the eventual outcome of the Presidential election.  

The Kraken 

Most of you are probably aware by now of Sidney Powell’s statement on Lou Dobbs program on Fox Business Network Sunday night that she was “going to release the Kraken!” The mythical monstrous sea-creature in this case turned out to be a whistleblower with deep inside knowledge of Smartmatic coming forward with detailed information on exactly how the Democrat Party attempted to steal the election. Since then she has released excerpts of the affidavit.  

According to Ms. Powell, Smartmatic, “was created to produce altered voting results in Venezuela for Hugo Chavez and then shipped internationally to manipulate votes for purchase in other countries – including [America}. It was funded by money from Venezuela and Cuba, and China has a role in it also.” Smartmatic has as i’s core the SCORECARD algorithm which allows it to switch votes…but it turned out to be MUCH more than that. Below are screenshots from the affidavit Ms. Powell released. While all of this is shocking to the conscience of any fair-minded patriot, particular attention should be given to paragraphs 17-19:  

Ok, now pick your jaw up off the floor. Does the Nicolas Maduro election of 2013 as laid out in paragraphs 17-19 sound familiar? Maduro’s opponent was way ahead, the voting was “stopped”, then when it was resumed all of a sudden Maduro was back in the lead. This is exactly what happened at 2am on November 4th in WI, MI, PA, GA, AZ, and NV. The similarity is not an accident…and we all know it.  

The staggering thing about this is that Smartmatic’s software is not just used in Dominion’s voting systems…they are used in EVERY voting system (paragraph 21)! Which would include the ones used here in Oklahoma!!! Makes you wonder if Kendra Horn really ousted Steve Russell in 2018, doesn’t it? I’d say it deserves a SERIOUS look by our election officials.  

To clarify, we are NOT saying that our election officials knowingly purchased voting systems rife with fraudulent software. However, as Sidney Powell and the whistleblower have pointed out, the software is inherently flawed. This leaves to potential that future elections could be tampered with. We cannot afford that risk. 

In fact, evidence has come out that what really happened in 2016 was that they preprogrammed an upper limit of vote switching in the algorithm based on how many people they thought would vote. The problem was more people voted for Trump than they planned on and Trump ended up beating the algorithm. As was exposed in today’s press conference, this year they removed that upper limit, however Trump STILL beat it because of the historic turnout. That’s when that had to pull a “Venezuela”, stop the voting, bring in the fake ballots, and then restart the voting so Biden could “win.”  

The Raid 

Another huge development as reported on Friday night is that the servers that actually count the votes for U.S. elections ARE NOT LOCATED IN THE U.S.! They are maintained by a company named Sytle, whose headquarters are in Barcelona, Spain, but whose servers were recently moved to Frankfurt, Germany.  

If you follow Ignite Liberty’s social media accounts, you know we mentioned rumors on Friday of a U.S. Military raid on the Sytle servers on Friday, assisted by the FBI and DOJ. Initially we were unable to confirm these reports. However, we know believe these reports to be true. Here’s why:

First, skepticism of the raid initially was fueled by doubts that Angela Merkel would grant permission to the U.S. to perform a raid on a German company. After all, she’s no fan of Trump. As we’ve discovered, however, she may not have had a choice. 

As it turns out, on September 12, 2018 President Trump issued an Executive Order on Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election.3  The EO declared election security a national security issue and created a National Emergency which has NOT, I repeat, NOT been rescinded. This means the election we just had was conducted under a National Emergency.  

This EO gives President Trump the authority to freeze all assets of anyone or any company found to be materially interfering in a national election, and also gave him the authority to level heavy sanctions against the leading companies in each major economic sector of any country found to be aiding or assisting in any election interference.  

This would have given President Trump the leverage he needed to force the cooperation of any foreign country in allowing U.S. troops to seize any property that may have been used to interfere in the election. Once again, Trump was 10 steps ahead of EVERYONE!  

Second, both Saturday and Monday, Texas Representative Louis Gohmert (R), who sits on the House Judiciary Committee, and is the Vice-Chair of the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security and Investigations, confirmed that the U.S. Armed Forces did indeed conduct a raid on the Sytle servers in Frankfurt, Germany. Given his position, it is highly unlikely that he would say such a thing once, let alone twice, if it hadn’t actually happened.  

Third, the Gateway Pundit, quoting a highly reliable source, confirmed that: 

 “The US government, once they determined that this Dominion server was involved in switching votes, then the intelligence community began a search for the server and discovered that the server was in Germany. In order to get access to that server and have it available for use in a legal manner they had to have the State Department work in tandem with the Department of Justice. They had to request that the government of Germany cooperate in allowing this seizure of this server. 

The appropriate documents required to affect that kind of seizure were put in place, signed off on, and it appears there was also a US military support in this operation. The USA military was not in the lead. But this helps explains why Esper was fired and Millers and Kash Patel were put in place – so that the military would not interfere with the operation in any way.   

By getting ahold of the server they now are going to have the direct evidence of when they were instructed to stop counting. They will also discover who gave the direction to stop counting and who initiated the algorithm that started switching votes. The CIA was completely excluded from this operation.”4 

This, included with the Smartmatic whistleblower, is literally Game, Set, Match! The Trump team will literally have ALL of the evidence necessary to not just prove the vote switching took place, but prove who did it. Regardless of what happens with the recount lawsuits, this would be more than enough evidence to overturn the election results and make official what we already know…that President Trump won re-election. 

She may not be singing, but the Fat Lady is most certainly warming up her vocal cords.  

What Happens Next 

Without question, this is a constitutional crisis unlike anything our Republic has faced. It is difficult to know or predict exactly what is going to happen next simply because there’s no precedent for a situation like this. Sure, we’ve had contested elections before in 1876, 1888, 1960, and 2000, but nothing where the fraud was this elaborate, extensive, and involved so many people and countries. So rather than speculate on exactly how things are going to happen, let’s focus on what we’re confident will happen. 

First, and most important, we stand firm in our belief that President Trump will be reinaugurated on January 20, 2021 for a second term. He won in an unprecedented landslide. L. Lin Wood, attorney for Team Trump, has stated on the Mark Levin Show that President Trump likely won more than 70% of the popular vote, and likely had over 400 electoral votes…a Reagan-style landslide. The rock-solid evidence of fraud is so overwhelming that no court of law in any free country would uphold a Biden Presidency…especially not SCOTUS with 5 conservative justices.  

Second, there will be MASSIVE arrests and prosecution…and the names that get arrested are going to shock the world. Maybe not shock Conservatives…but shock the world. Sidney Powell has even stated that evidence is coming out that several state Governors are guilty of a, “Hunter Biden-type graft to line their own pockets by getting voting machines in that would either make sure their election was successful or they got money for their family from it.”5 

Third, even if the states in question try and certify fraudulent votes, it won’t matter. Ms. Powell was clear on this as well, saying, “I think even if the states are stupid enough to go ahead and certify the votes where we know the machines were operating and producing altered election results — if they’re stupid enough to do that — then they will be set aside by the fraud also.”6 

Do we know how exactly all of this is going to happen? Not a chance. This is perhaps closely likened to being on an amazing roller coaster. You have no idea which way things are going to turn, but you do know it’s going to be one HECK of a ride that you’ll tell your kids and grandkids about for the rest of your life. 

 

1. https://www.worldviewweekend.com/news/article/biden-using-scorecard-and-hammer-steal-another-us-presidential-election-just-obama-and
2. A Strategic Vision for America’s Quantum Networks, The White House National Quantum Coordinating Office. Feb, 2020.
3. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-imposing-certain-sanctions-event-foreign-interference-united-states-election/
4. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/us-raid-software-company-scytl-seize-servers-germany-intel-source-says-yes-happened/
5. https://noqreport.com/2020/11/15/sidney-powell-staggering-evidence-of-vote-fraud-dominion-machines-engineered-by-china-venezuela-cuba/
   
6. Ibid.COPYRIGHT © 2020 · IGNITE LIBERTY

Friends and Fellow Patriots,

In light of the Fake News Media’s calling of the election today for Joe Biden, we felt it prudent to set the record straight, and state the current facts of the situation as it exists today. There have been significant developments, many of which I’m sure you’re aware of, that the MSM is completely ignoring – no surprise there.

Some of this will not be a surprise to many of you, however we haven’t seen anyone in the real media put the pieces of the puzzle together yet. So, allow us to try and piece together the full picture for you in a way that makes sense. We hope this provides you some clarity, peace of mind, and some talking points to use with your neighbors, family, and friends.

Who Really Decides Elections?

First off, let’s have a little civics review on how Presidential Elections are actually decided. After the legally cast votes that are cast either on election day, during the early voting period, or by absentee ballots (which still much be RECEIVED by the election authorities BY Election Day), are counted, the Secretary of State of each individual state will certify the votes in their states as being valid. (NOTE: this CANNOT be done if there are legal challenges to the validity of the vote).

After that, the legislatures of each state select the Electors from that state to go to the Electoral College on December 18th in Washington DC (though many simply cast their votes via phone) and cast the votes for President according to the direction of the State Legislatures, which historically has fallen in-line with the popular vote in their state.

If there are still legal challenges to the validity of the vote at that time, it is incumbent upon those Legislatures to protect that vote by any means possible, even if it meant refusing to send their electors to cast their vote. This is one of the safeguards built into the Electoral College system.

Such a situation, then, would prevent either candidate from achieving the necessary Electoral College votes to secure the Presidency. At that point, The U.S. Senate would choose the Vice President, and the House of Representatives would choose the President. However, in both houses each State’s delegation would only get one vote.

If this particular scenario plays out here, President Trump would be reelected by the House and Vice President Pence would be chosen by the Senate because there are far more Republican delegations in both houses than Democrats. That being said, we do not believe it will get this far.

Trump Saw ALL of This Coming…

President Trump, long before he even chose to run, decried the fraudulent manner in which Democrats win elections. In 2012, he tweeted out this:

Once he was President (more on how that happened later) he had the opportunity to actually do something about the voter fraud. In 2018 he declared election security a National Security issue and created a new Federal law enforcement agency to help ensure the integrity of our elections. That agency is called the Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency, or CISA (www.cisa.gov).

According to their website, they are the “lead federal agency responsible for securing the Nation’s election infrastructure.”[1] They are under the Department of Homeland Security. The CISA then launched, and President Trump’s direction, the #Protect2020 Strategic Plan.

As part of this plan, they initiated the Elections Infrastructure Information Sharing and Analysis Center (EI-ISAC) which, “facilitates the sharing of cyber and critical election infrastructure data among members and others as appropriate, in order to promote communication regarding election- related disinformation and cyber and election infrastructure readiness and response efforts.”[2]

Part of this process was coordinating with the NGOs who provide valuable services to the election process, such as voting machines, vote tabulation software, paper ballot creation, etc. For instance, there are only three different companies in the U.S. who manufacture election tabulation software; Election Systems and Software out of Omaha, NE; Dominion Voting Systems out of Denver, CO; and Hart InterCivic out of Austin, TX.

Despite the creation of the CISA, because they are private companies all three of these firms are notoriously lapse in their cybersecurity, and, “face no significant federal oversight and operate under a shroud of financial and operational secrecy despite their pivotal role underpinning American democracy.”[3]

We’ve seen proof of that this week with the “glitch” reported in Dominion Voting Systems used in 53 of 87 counties in Michigan which flipped 6,000 votes from President Trump to Biden.[4] Interestingly enough, in 2019 the AP reported that the voting systems used in several different states were nearing end-of-life for their operating systems which make them more vulnerable to compromise[5]. The states mentioned in this report are Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Florida, Iowa, Indiana, Arizona, North Carolina, and Michigan.

In this election, Dominion Voting Systems, which only took votes from President Trump (and not the other way around),  was used in 30 states including ALL of the battleground states. The Gateway Pundit has a great article about it that can be found here:

Trump Attorney: Manual Recounts May Be Necessary in 30 States After Software “Glitch” Is Caught Erasing 6,000 Votes for Donald Trump in Just One County

Was it a “Glitch”?

Lt. Gen. McInerney, a highly decorated retired U.S. Air Force officer, along with Sydney Powell, the attorney for Gen. Michael Flynn, broke huge news this week on multiple news outlets of the presence of The Hammer and Scorecard. Instead of trying to explain these, I’ll just let them speak for themselves:

Democracy at Stake: @SidneyPowell1 @TomFitton discuss the potential for nationwide voter irregularities & whether state legislatures and courts will uphold the rule of law. #MAGA #AmericaFirst #Dobbs pic.twitter.com/srJFNAaVA7

— Lou Dobbs (@LouDobbs) November 6, 2020

Lt. Gen. McInerney also described the programs as follows:

“The General described “Hammer” and “Scorecard,” a pair of programs initially designed for the CIA before being privatized by Deep State players from the Obama administration. We explained how they work in an article last week, but the gist is this: “Hammer” or “THE HAMMER” is a counter-intelligence surveillance program used to spy on activities on protected networks (like voting machines) without detection while “Scorecard” is a vote-manipulation application that changes votes during transfer. It’s the least detectable form of election manipulation because it works during data transfer between voting stations and data storage hubs. Unless both sides are looking for irregularities, it’s impossible to catch. If nefarious forces had people on one side or the other (or both) during data transfer, it cannot be exposed.”[6]

The General explained on Steve Bannon’s Real America’s Voice (link here) that the Scorecard program was used by Obama in the 2012 election to secure the State of Florida, and also was used during the 2020 Democratic Primaries by Joe Biden to defeat Bernie Sanders. He also states in no uncertain terms that this was the so-called “glitch” that the GOP found in Michigan. In other words, it wasn’t a glitch…it was deliberate switching of votes by the Democrat Party.

What about the “Watermark”?

As if vote switching wasn’t enough, two former intelligence officers have come out in the last several days stating that the official paper that the states used to print the ballots (likely through the same contractor) contained an invisible watermark using special ink that could be tracked using blockchain technology.

One such person was Dr. Steve Pieczinik, a highly respected retired intelligence agent who served as a Deputy Secretary of State under President’s Nixon, Ford, Carter, and Bush 41, and was a senior policy advisor under Reagan. You can read more about him here. He stated in no uncertain terms that what is happening is not a stealing of the election. It is a carefully crafted sting operation designed to take down the Democrat Voter Fraud Machine once and for all. You can listen to him here:

https://www.brighteon.com/0fda65dc-cdd0-4a22-94c6-8cd95885f7ed

This has also been posited by Tony Shaffer, a retired intelligence officer and current President of the London Center for Policy Research and a member of Trump’s 2020 Advisory Board. You can see his tweets below:

This makes even more sense in light of President Trump’s warning during his election night speech that the Democrats would manufacture “10’s of millions of fake ballots” in order to overcome any legitimate Trump lead. Considering the creation of CISA to guarantee election security, it is reasonable to assume that they would take such measures to ensure that only legitimate ballots received by Election Day are counted.

Given that such measures would likely be considered top secret, it is also reasonable to assume that only those with a TS-SAR (Top Secret – Special Access Required) would know about such security measures, thus keeping the Democrat party in the dark. Dr. Pieczinik confirmed as much when he stated that he was only given clearance to reveal the use of the watermarks after the election.

Can we prove that watermarks were used? Are they microdots? Time will tell. If it is true it will likely come out in the legal battle that begin Monday, according to President Trump’s press release today. There are videos circulating on social media of people holding up legitimate absentee ballots to infrared light revealing previously invisible numbers on the paper, as well as people detecting microdots using a gemscope. One such video is below. You be the judge:

So What Does All of This Mean?

What all of this amounts to, as Dr. Pieczenik pointed out, is an elaborate sting operation to catch the Democrat Voter Fraud Machine committing criminal acts. It’s not enough to know that the Democrats were going to use Scorecard and fake ballots, you have to actually catch them in the act in order to convict them of a crime and rid our Republic of these traitors once and for all.

While the full details will be known in the coming weeks and months, we believe the sting worked something like this:

At some point prior to the 2016 election, President Trump was informed of the presence of The Hammer, and how it along with Scorecard was used against him during his 2016 campaign. That’s when he started claiming that he was spied upon by the Obama administration (using The Hammer).

He also knew that they would continue to use it against him during his presidency, which is why he instructed the DNI to record all phone calls he made (remember the call to the Ukrainian president?) in order to cover himself from any accusation of wrongdoing.

President Trump was also notified of the existence and use of Scorecard by the Democrat Party against him in 2016. Fortunately, according to Lt. Gen. McInerny, “something happened and it didn’t work. I can’t say any more than that.” As such, he knew that they would try to use it against him in 2020 if their attempts to impeach him were unsuccessful.

As a countermove, he established CISA in order to begin to put the pieces in place for a massive sting operation. (you have to wonder why no other president thought to put such measures in to protect our elections)

Those pieces include monitoring Scorecard for usage on Election Night (which is critical because otherwise it’s undetectable), as well as working with the NGOs responsible for printing paper ballots to mark the paper used with invisible ink that would also be traceable using blockchain technology, as Dr. Pieczinik pointed out.

Then, after the election, once they found out where Scorecard was used they could alert the local Republican Party officials of the use of Scorecard (a.k.a. the “glitch”) and ask them to hand-recount the ballots. This is what happened in Michigan, showing the 6,000 vote swing.

Speaking of Scorecard, Newt Gingrich has commented how 6 states that Trump was leading all of a sudden stopped counting at 2am. This is because the Democrats had already activated Scorecard, and it wasn’t working. See, Scorecard is only designed to flip anywhere from 3-5% of the vote, otherwise the fraud would be too obvious. That’s why they only use it in “swing states” that could go either way.

The problem on Tuesday night is that Trump was winning outside that 3-5% margin, rendering Scorecard useless. The result? The Dems ordered their operative to stop counting to give them time to bring in plan B: the fake ballots. In some cases they had to ship them in, like in Detroit. In others they had to set up a ballot stuffing operation, like we’ve seen on the live feeds in Philadelphia circulating throughout social media. This move proves to be the Dems fatal flaw.

Once the use of Scorecard was made public, the Trump Campaign would have the legal justification to demand hand re-counts in every state that used the software programs that Scorecard compromised, in this case Dominion Voting Systems. Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch pointed out on Friday that Jay Sekulow, the president’s attorney, stated that manual recounts may be required in every state that used Dominion software:

This is where the watermark comes into play.

During the hand recounts, they will use the technology needed to identify official ballots that have the watermark from fake ballots that don’t. That’s when the sting is complete and they are able to prove that all of the “mail-in” ballots (NOT absentee ballots) are fraudulent. Those ballots will then be disallowed.

President Trump will then be declared the winner in a Reagan-esque Electoral College landslide, and the Democrats complicit in this attempted coup will be arrested and charged with election fraud, treason, and who know’s what else. President Trump will have dismantled the Democrat Party Fraud Machine once and for all, and our republic will have been saved.

Granted, this is just a theory, but it’s one that makes a ton of sense. Of course there’s also a TON of evidence of voter fraud that I haven’t covered here…not to mention the solid legal challenges that will almost certainly break the President’s way.

Could the Dems be THAT Stupid?

First off, it’s not an issue of stupidity. Because President Trump declared our elections a national security issue they were simply legally kept in the dark since they had no “need to know.” Now that the use of watermarks has been leaked, they know the “fix is in.” They know they’re hosed. That’s where the media comes in.

If you remember in 2000, after they withdrew the Florida projection the media refused to call the election for either Bush or Gore until the legal battles were through. This time, however, they have broadly and boldly declared that Biden has won the Presidency.

Why would they do this if they know the Democrats have been caught, and that it’s only a matter of time before the truth is known and President Trump is declared the victor? The answer is simple, and gives a glimpse of their grand scheme: to cast a pall of illegitimacy upon a President Trump victory.

By declaring a Biden victory, the media is conditioning at least half of the country to the notion of a legitimate Biden presidency. That way when Trump is declared victor, they will be able to state that Trump has “stolen the presidency” and that our constitutional system has been compromised beyond repair.

That will then justify violence in the streets and the demand to do away with the constitution and replace it with a “fair and just system” = Communism. Make no mistake friends, THIS IS THEIR END GOAL.

This is how Communist revolutions work. Cast doubt over a legitimate election, in order to stir the people up into revolting and overthrowing the “illegitimate” government and replacing it with a “legitimate” one that is chosen “by the people.” Every wonder why Communist countries use the terms “People’s Republic of…”? This is why, and THIS is their end-goal for America.

So What Do We Do?

Make no mistake, friends, this is not a situation where we can sit idly by and just watch everything play out. We MUST do our part by sharing the truth with our family and friends. We MUST warn them of what’s REALLY going on WHETHER THEY CHOOSE TO BELIEVE US OR NOT.

That way when the truth DOES come out they won’t fall for the lie that Trump’s election is illegitimate. EVEN IF THEY MOCK YOU AND CALL YOU CRAZY you MUST share this truth with them. Let them think you’re crazy…when the truth comes out, they will realize you’re not and will thank you for telling them the truth.

Do NOT let the media go unchallenged, ESPECIALLY YOUR LOCAL MEDIA! Challenge them at EVERY turn. Challenge them by reminding them that they should act as they did in 2000 and refuse to call the election until all legal challenges have been ruled upon by the Supreme Court.

Until it’s publicly announced by Trump’s legal defense team, I would refrain from getting too much into the watermark debate. Hit them on the use of Scorecard and the Hammer and DEMAND that they refuse to unduly influence the American public until the full truth is known.

Most importantly, my friends, REFUSE to be discouraged! REFUSE to give in and believe the lies! If we falter and lose faith, then our friends and family will lose faith and we will ALL fall victim to the Democrat’s ultimate goal. Now, more than ever it is CRITICALLY important to stay engaged. If you’re not following us on social media, please do.

We are also on MeWe and Parler. Simply look for Ignite Liberty OKC. Additionally, we are working on starting a podcast. We are committed to keeping you up-to-date on the latest breaking news in this fight for our country’s freedom. If you appreciate the work of independent journalism, please consider joining those who are supporting us on a monthly basis by donating to our efforts.

Above all, my friends…

Keep the Fight, Keep the Faith!!!

Bryan Armstrong, JM, MBA
SGT, USA (Ret)
OIF 07-09
President
Ignite Liberty, LLC
Ignite Liberty OKC

[1] #Protect2020 Strategic Plan, www.cisa.gov
[2] Ibid.
[3] “US election integrity depends on security-challenged firms.” AP, October 29, 2018.
[4] “BREAKING: Michigan Legislature to Convene Joint Oversight Hearing Saturday After ‘Glitches’ Give 6,000 Trump Votes to Biden.” Pjmedia.com
[5] “AP Exclusive: New election systems use vulnerable software.” AP, July 13, 2019.
[6] “‘Hammer’ and ‘Scorecard’: Lt. Gen. McInerney explains the election hack by Democrats.” November 4, 2020. Noqreport.com

COPYRIGHT © 2020 · IGNITE LIBERTY